全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

全球数据跨境流动治理研究综述
A Review of Research on the Governance of Global Cross-Border Data Flows

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116807, PP. 5657-5665

Keywords: 数据跨境流动,全球治理体系,数据治理
Cross-Border Flow of Data
, Global Governance System, Data Governance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着信息技术的发展,数据作为一种新型生产要素,已经成为国家最重要的战略资源和核心竞争力的关键要素。近年来,数字经济迅猛发展,数据的跨境流动规模呈现指数型增长,对全球经济的贡献引人瞩目,数据跨境流动治理成为关系各国政治、经济、社会的重要议题。本文运用系统性文献综述的方法,从全球数据跨境流动主要治理模式、主要国家/地区的治理模式、主要贸易协定中相关规定以及我国治理现状等方面阐述全球数据跨境流动治理现状。通过分析发现,现全球主要研究重心在美国及欧盟,多数国家以美国模式或欧盟模式为参照,对我国申请加入的贸易协定研究也较少,且我国规制方式也存在一定缺点。未来研究中应从多个国家的治理模式入手,并针对性地研究我国申请加入的贸易协定,为我国数据跨境流动治理提出有效的建议。
With the development of information technology, data, as a new type of production factor, has become the country’s most important strategic resources and key elements of core competitiveness. In recent years, with the rapid development of the digital economy, the scale of cross-border data flow has shown exponential growth, and its contribution to the global economy has attracted attention, and the governance of cross-border data flow has become an important issue related to the politics, economy and society of various countries. This paper uses the method of systematic literature review to explain the governance status of global cross-border data flow from the aspects of the main governance models of global cross-border data flow, the governance models of major countries/regions, the relevant provisions in major trade agreements, and the current governance status of China. Through analysis, it is found that the main research focus of the world is the United States and the European Union, and most countries use the US model or the EU model as a reference, and there is less research on the trade agreements that China has applied to join, and there are also certain shortcomings in China’s regulatory methods. In future research, we should start from the governance models of many countries, and study the trade agreements that China has applied to join, so as to put forward effective suggestions for the governance of cross-border data flow in China.

References

[1]  姚旭. 跨境数据流动治理中的韩国路径与欧盟路径[J]. 韩国研究论丛, 2017(2): 237-249.
[2]  东方. 欧盟、美国跨境数据流动法律规制比较分析及应对挑战的“中国智慧” [J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(12): 92-97, 104.
[3]  张茉楠. 数字主权背景下的全球跨境数据流动动向与对策[J]. 中国经贸导刊, 2020(18): 49-52.
[4]  相丽玲, 张佳彧. 中外跨境数据流动的法律监管制度研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(4): 74-78, 49.
[5]  冉从敬, 郭潇凡, 何梦婷. 国际跨境数据流动治理合作: 机理、困境与变革[J/OL]. 图书馆论坛, 2023: 1-9. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/detail/44.1306.G2.20230524.1047.004.html
[6]  黄道丽, 何治乐. 欧美数据跨境流动监管立法的“大数据现象”及中国策略[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(4): 47-53.
[7]  Sulivan, C. (2019) EU GDPR or APEC CBPR? A Comparative Analysis of the Approach of the EU and APEC to cross Border Data Transfers and Protection of Personal Data in the IoT Era. Computer Law & Security Review, 35, 380-397.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.004
[8]  胡炜. 跨境数据流动立法的价值取向与我国选择[J]. 社会科学, 2018(4): 95-102.
[9]  许多奇. 个人数据跨境流动规制的国际格局及中国应对[J]. 法学论坛, 2018, 33(3): 130-137.
[10]  李艳华. 全球跨境数据流动的规制路径与中国抉择[J]. 时代法学, 2019, 17(5): 106-116.
[11]  Walters, R., Trakman, L. and Zeller, B. (2019) Data Protection Law: A Comparative Analysis of Asia-Pacific and European Approaches. Springer, Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8110-2
[12]  Aaronson, S.A. and Leblond, P. (2018) Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and Its Implications for the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law, 21, 245-272.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgy019
[13]  Mantelero, A. (2021) The Future of Data Protection: Gold Standard vs. Global Standard. Computer Law& Security Review, 40, Article ID: 105500.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105500
[14]  冯洁菡, 周濛. 跨境数据流动规制: 核心议题、国际方案及中国因应[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 38(4): 88-97.
[15]  阙天舒, 王子玥. 数字经济时代的全球数据安全治理与中国策略[J]. 国际安全研究, 2022, 40(1): 130-154.
[16]  王燕. 跨境数据流动治理的国别模式及其反思[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2022, 38(1): 99-112.
[17]  Brehmer, H.J. (2018) Data Localization: The Unintended Consequences of Privacy Litigation. American University Law Review, 67, Article 6.
[18]  田晓萍. 贸易壁垒视角下的欧盟《一般数据保护条例》[J]. 政法论丛, 2019(4): 13.
[19]  黄海瑛, 何梦婷. 基于CLOUD法案的美国数据主权战略解读[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2019, 9(2): 34-45.
[20]  王金照, 李广乾, 等. 跨境数据流动: 战略与政策[M]. 北京: 中国发展出版社, 2020.
[21]  Chen, S. (2021) Research on Data Sovereignty Rules in Cross-Border Data Flow and Chinese Solution. US-China Law Review, 8, 261-273.
https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2021.06.001
[22]  洪延青. 推进“一带一路”数据跨境流动的中国方案——以美欧范式为背景的展开[J]. 中国法律评论, 2021(2): 30-42.
[23]  冉从敬, 何梦婷, 刘先瑞. 数据主权视野下我国跨境数据流动治理与对策研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2021(4): 1-14.
[24]  Chin, Y.C. and Zhao, J.W. (2022) Governing Cross-Border Data Flows: International Trade Agreements and Their Limits. Laws, 11, Article 63.
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040063
[25]  Mattoo, A. and Meltzer, J.P. (2018) International Data Flows and Privacy: The Conflict and Its Resolution. Journal of International Economic Law, 21, 769-789.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgy044
[26]  杨帆. 后“Schrems II案”时期欧盟数据跨境流动法律监管的演进及我国的因应[J]. 环球法律评论, 2022, 44(1): 15.
[27]  梅傲, 李淮俊. 论《数据出境安全评估办法》与DEPA中数据跨境流动规则的衔接[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2023, 30(2): 62-72.
[28]  金晶. 欧盟的规则, 全球的标准? 数据跨境流动监管的“逐顶竞争” [J]. 中外法学, 2023, 35(1): 46-65.
[29]  谢永江, 朱琳, 尚洁. 欧美隐私盾协议及其对我国的启示[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(6): 39-44.
[30]  曹杰, 王晶. 跨境数据流动规则分析——以欧美隐私盾协议为视角[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2017, 33(4): 107-116.
[31]  赵海乐. RCEP争端解决机制对数据跨境流动问题的适用与中国因应[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2021, 5(6): 39-55.
[32]  陈寰琦, 陆锐盈. DEPA数据安全规则解析及对中国的启示——基于CPTPP/USMCA/RCEP的对比[J]. 长安大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(2): 22-31.
[33]  王玫黎, 陈雨. 中国数据跨境流动规则与CPTPP的对接研究[J]. 国际贸易, 2022(4): 20-29.
[34]  周念利, 于美月. 中国应如何对接DEPA——基于DEPA与RCEP对比的视角[J]. 理论学刊, 2022(2): 55-64.
[35]  徐程锦. 中国跨境数据流动规制体系的CPTPP合规性研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2023, 39(2): 69-87.
[36]  Anupam, C. (2019) Data Nationalism. Emory Law, 22, 394-395.
[37]  Shekhar, R. and Choudhary, A.Y. (2022) Data Localization and Cross-Border Flow of Data: Balancing the Incongruent Dimension of Barriers, Safeguards and “Free Flow of Data”. RGNUL Financial and Mercantile Law Review (RFMLR), No. 12, 19-42.
[38]  范婴. 数据本地化的内涵分化与模式选择[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(6): 86-91, 79.
[39]  张丽, 孙菲阳. 跨境数据流动: 全球治理趋势与我国的规制策略[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2022.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133