全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

刑法中因果关系理论发展研究
Research on the Development of Causation Theory in Criminal Law

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116713, PP. 4987-4994

Keywords: 条件说,相当因果关系理论,客观归责理论,危险现实化
Condition Theory
, Considerable Causality Theory, Objective Imputation Theory, Realization of Dan-ger

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

刑法中的因果关系理论是刑法中的重要理论。作为客观构成要件的因果关系由于司法实践与学说理论的变化经历了传统的条件说、原因说、相当因果关系说到新兴的客观归责理论、危险的现实化理论。传统的条件说因为所得出的因果关系范围过于宽泛而被予以前置化,但是条件说在以往的司法实践中被予以广泛的运用。条件说之后的原因说由于对因果关系的判断标准不明确予以抛弃。相当因果关系说曾一度成为因果关系理论的通说,但随着司法实践中问题的不断增加使得相当因果关系说面临着客观归责理论与危险的现实化理论的挑战。对于刑法因果关系的理论进行梳理期望能找到符合中国司法实践需求的因果关系理论。
The theory of causation in criminal law is an important theory in criminal law. As an objective constituent element, causality has undergone traditional conditional theory, cause theory, and considerable causal relationship due to changes in judicial practice and doctrine theory, to the emerging objective attribution theory and dangerous reality theory. The traditional conditional theory has been premised because the scope of causal relationship derived is too broad, but the conditional theory has been widely used in previous judicial practice. The reason after the condition theory is that it is discarded because the criteria for judging causation are not clear. The theory of considerable causation once became the general theory of causation, but with the increasing number of problems in judicial practice, the theory of considerable causation is challenged by objective attribution theory and dangerous realistic theory. The theory of causality in criminal law is sorted out, and it is hoped that a causal theory that meets the needs of China’s judicial practice can be found.

References

[1]  荣春. 介入因素的类型及其因果论立场[J]. 政法论丛, 2022(5): 78-89.
[2]  钱叶六. 刑法因果关系理论的重要发展与立场选择[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(4): 95-111.
[3]  木村龟二. 刑法学词典[M]. 顾肖荣, 译. 上海: 上海翻译出版公司, 1991.
[4]  黎宏. 刑法因果关系论考察[J]. 清华法学, 2022, 16(3): 112-130.
[5]  李会彬. 刑法因果关系中事实判断与规范评价的区分[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(4): 107-124.
[6]  Roxin, C. (2020) Strafrecht Allge-meiner Teil, Band 1, 5. Aufl., C. H. Beck.
[7]  孙运梁. 客观归责论在我国的本土化: 立场选择与规则适用[J]. 法学, 2019(5): 183-192.
[8]  周光权. 客观归责与过失犯论[J]. 中国检察官, 2014(13): 72.
[9]  董玉庭. 从客观因果流程到刑法因果关系[J]. 中国法学, 2019(5): 249-266.
[10]  Roxin, C. (2011) Zur neueren Entwicklung der Strafrechtsdogmatik in Deutschland, GA.
[11]  邹兵建. 论相当因果关系说的三种形态[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(4): 76-96.
[12]  杨建军. 刑法因果关系的司法证明[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(6): 76-90.
[13]  张小虎. 论刑法替代因果关系的归责: 理论基奠与事实根据[J]. 政治与法律, 2019(9): 93-104.
[14]  张绍谦. 论刑法因果关系的介入和中断[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1999(5): 66-70.
[15]  陈兴良. 从归因到归责: 客观归责理论研究[J]. 法学研究, 2006(2): 70-86.
[16]  孙运梁. 以客观归责理论限定不作为犯的先行行为[J]. 中外法学, 2017, 29(5): 1351-1376.
[17]  车浩. 假定因果关系、结果避免可能性与客观归责[J]. 法学研究, 2009, 31(5): 145-163.
[18]  陈兴良. 刑法法理的三重语境[J]. 中国法律评论, 2019(3): 68-81.
[19]  田宏杰. 我国犯罪过失客观化思潮的反思[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2023(2): 54-70.
[20]  蒋太珂. 被害人特殊体质案件的结果归责: 预见可能性要件的意义及其认定规则[J]. 政治与法律, 2023(7): 94-110.
[21]  储陈城. 意外事件的阶层化判断[J]. 刑事法评论, 2017, 40(1): 479-494.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133