全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论产品责任中生产者、销售者责任之归责原则认定——对《民法典》第1202、1203条的阐释
On the Attribution Principle of Producer and Seller Liability in Product Liability—Interpretation of Articles 1202 and 1203 of the Civil Code

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116710, PP. 4965-4972

Keywords: 产品责任,归责原则,《民法典》,矫正正义
Product Liability
, Principle of Liability, Civil Code, Corrective Justice

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

《民法典》1202、1203条在文义上沿用《民法通则》生产者、销售者对受损者承担无过错责任的归责原则,并吸收《侵权责任法》的“产品存在缺陷”之表述、有过错的销售者应承担最终责任的归责原则特点。通过分析过错责任与无过错责任的法理基础,考虑保护消费者权益宗旨、立法目的及我国社会背景,结合《民法典》的现行调整,笔者认为产品责任中生产者、销售者责任之归责原则采用二元归责原则更为妥当,提出以立法或司法解释形式确定与完善相关缺位概念,对无过错归责原则一般情形进行细化规定,完善特别法中产品责任归责原则之立法纰漏,政府对相关配套措施支持与完善等建议。
Articles 1202 and 1203 of the Civil Code follow the principle of non-fault liability of the producer and seller to the damaged person in the General Principles of the Civil Law, and absorb the expression of “product defects” in the Tort Liability Law, and the characteristics of the principle of liability that the seller at fault should bear the ultimate responsibility. By analyzing the legal basis of fault liability and no-fault liability, considering the purpose of protecting consumers’ rights and interests, legislative purpose and social background in China, combined with the current adjustment of the Civil Code, the author believes that it is more appropriate to adopt the dualistic principle of liability for the responsibility of producers and sellers in product liability, and proposes to determine and improve the concept of related defects in the form of legislative or judicial interpretation. The gen-eral situation of no-fault imputation principle is elaborated, the legislative flaws of product liability imputation principle in special law are improved, and the government supports and improves the relevant supporting measures.

References

[1]  工卫国. 过错责任原则: 第三次勃兴[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2000: 245.
[2]  佟柔. 民法原理[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1986(6): 87.
[3]  张新宝, 任鸿雁. 我国产品责任制度: 守成与创新[J]. 北方法学, 2012(6): 10.
[4]  江平. 民法中的视为、推定与举证责任[J]. 政法论坛, 1987(4): 32.
[5]  王利明. 中华人民共和国侵权责任法释义[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2010: 212.
[6]  钱玉文. 论我国产品责任归责原则的完善——以《产品质量法》第41、42条为分析对象[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2017(2): 90.
[7]  高圣平. 产品责任中生产者和销售者之间的不真正连带责任——以《侵权责任法》第五章为分析对象[J]. 法学论坛, 2012, 27(2): 19.
[8]  杨立新. 中华人民共和国民法典释义与案例评注?侵权责任编[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2020: 196.
[9]  章正璋. 论我国现行民法上的不真正连带债务[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2011(5): 23.
[10]  杨立新. 侵权责任追偿权的“背锅”理论及法律关系展开——对《民法典》规定的侵权责任追偿权规则的整理[J]. 求是学刊, 2021, 48(1): 126-131.
[11]  杨立新. 《民法典》对侵权责任规则的修改与完善[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2020(4): 37.
[12]  王泽鉴. 民法学说与判例研究(第3册) [M]. 中国政法大学出版社, 2005: 15-203.
[13]  梁慧星. 论产品制造者、销售者的严格责任[J]. 法学研究, 1990(5): 33-65.
[14]  高完成. 自动驾驶汽车致损事故的产品责任适用困境及对策研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 41(6): 118.
[15]  王泽鉴. 商品制造人责任与消费者之保护[J]. 正中书局, 1982(2): 148-149.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133