|
审前社会服务令制度研究
|
Abstract:
随着刑事犯罪结构发生重大变化、法律的进步和法治观念的普及,惩罚性司法转向恢复性司法,犯罪人应承担起修复受损的社会关系的责任。审前社会服务令,可在审查起诉环节将部分轻罪案件分流,优化司法资源配置,缓解“案多人少”的矛盾。现实中存在检察机关的不起诉裁量权未充分行使导致不起诉适用率低、检察机关缺乏监督、传统司法观念影响等问题。应通过明确社会服务令的适用条件、健全不起诉案件适用社会服务令的监督机制、检察机关转变司法观念等路径加以完善。
With significant changes in the structure of criminal offenses, progress in the law, and the popularization of the concept of the rule of law, punitive justice has shifted towards restorative justice. Criminals should bear the responsibility of repairing damaged social relationships. The pre-trial social service order can divert some minor crime cases during the review and prosecution process, optimize the allocation of judicial resources, and alleviate the contradiction of “more cases and fewer people”. In reality, there are problems such as insufficient exercise of the discretion of the procuratorial organs to not prosecute, low application rate of not prosecuting, lack of supervision by the procuratorial organs, and the influence of traditional judicial concepts. We should improve it by clarifying the conditions for the application of social service orders, improving the supervision mechanism for the application of social service orders in non prosecution cases, and transforming the judicial concept of procuratorial organs.
[1] | 何荣功. 我国轻罪立法的体系思考[J]. 中外法学, 2018, 30(5): 1202-1221. |
[2] | 庄永廉, 孙长永, 苗生明, 彭胜坤, 常锋. 少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的内涵功能及其落实[J]. 人民检察, 2021(15): 37-44. |
[3] | 闫召华. 检察主导: 认罪认罚从宽程序模式的构建[J]. 现代法学, 2020, 42(4): 37-51. |
[4] | 孙远. 起诉裁量权的概念、范围与程序空间[J]. 求是学刊, 2022, 49(1): 94-103. |
[5] | 顾永忠. 附条件不起诉制度的必要性与正当性刍议[J]. 人民检察, 2008(9): 25-28. |
[6] | 吴秋元. 日本起诉犹豫制度及对我国的借鉴意义[J]. 聊城大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(4): 75-80. |
[7] | 冀洋. 我国轻罪化社会治理模式的立法反思与批评[J]. 东方法学, 2021(3): 124-139. |
[8] | 李勇. 适用非刑罚处罚措施, 做好不起诉后半篇文章[N]. 检察日报, 2022-09-19(003). |
[9] | 卢建平. 刑事政策视野中的认罪认罚从宽[J]. 中外法学, 2017, 29(4): 1000-1023. |
[10] | 陈卫东. 认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J]. 中国法学, 2016(2): 48-64. |