全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

反垄断检察民事公益诉讼受案范围之确定
Determination of the Scope of Accepting Cases in Civil Public Interest Litigation of Anti-Monopoly Prosecution

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116694, PP. 4862-4869

Keywords: 反垄断,民事公益诉讼,受案范围,检察机关
Anti-Monopoly
, Civil Public Interest Litigation, Scope of Accepting Cases, Procuratorial Authority

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

修订后的《反垄断法》赋予检察机关提起民事公益诉讼的资格,而构建反垄断检察民事公益诉讼的首要任务是确定反垄断检察民事公益诉讼的受案范围。“消费者福利”与“消费者选择”相结合的启动标准兼顾了传统的价格竞争领域和以平台经济为代表的非价格竞争领域,具有相当的科学性和合理性。结合现行反垄断法规制的垄断行为,垄断协议和滥用市场支配地位行为具有可诉的情形,而经营者集中行为并不适宜提起反垄断检察民事公益诉讼。
The revised “Anti-monopoly Law” gives the procuratorial organs the qualification to initiate civil public interest litigation, which makes the anti-monopoly civil litigation take an important step. As the first step to bring anti-monopoly procuratorial civil public interest litigation, it is urgent to determine the scope of accepting cases of anti-monopoly procuratorial civil public interest litigation. The non-price competition field represented by the platform economy makes the traditional “consumer surplus” standard fail, so it is urgent to build a start-up standard combining “consumer welfare” and “consumer choice”, and consider the monopoly behavior regulated by the current anti-monopoly law, so as to determine the specific scope of cases accepted by the anti-monopoly prosecution civil public interest litigation.

References

[1]  陈锐雄. 民法总则新论[M]. 台北: 三民书局, 1982: 913.
[2]  吴惟予. 平台经济领域中的反垄断公益诉讼研究——以消费者利益与社会公共利益为分析视角[J]. 上海法学研究, 2021(2): 130-140.
[3]  焦海涛. 反垄断法上的竞争损害与消费者利益标准[J]. 南大法学, 2022(2): 1-17.
[4]  理查德·波斯纳. 反托拉斯法[M]. 孙秋宁, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2003: 25.
[5]  陈云良. 反垄断民事公益诉讼: 消费者遭受垄断损害的救济之路[J]. 现代法学, 2018(5): 130-144.
[6]  钟皓珺. 以反垄断公益诉讼推进平台经济治理[J]. 人民论坛, 2022(18): 77-79.
[7]  王妮妮. 从个体效率主义到集体消费者主义——反垄断法分析范式的重大转变[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2016(3): 108-119+132.
[8]  黎业明. 从价格到质量: 数字经济时代反垄断法中消费者福利标准内涵的演变[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(3): 79-88.
[9]  Bundeskartellamt. Facebook, Exploitative Business Terms Pursuant to Section 19(1) GWB for Inadequate Date Processing. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B6-22-16.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4
[10]  Averitt, N.W. and Lande, R.H. (1996) Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law. Antitrust LJ, 65, 713.
[11]  Averitt, N.W. and Lande, R.H. (2007) Using the Consumer Choice Approach to Antitrust Law. Antitrust LJ, 74, 175.
[12]  谭袁. 检察机关提起反垄断公益诉讼问题研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2023: 128.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133