|
“141”协同育人模式下学习成效的评估分析——以杭州师范大学《数学分析》SPOC混合式课程为例
|
Abstract:
目前,大学生的学习成效是国内各高校研究和实践的热点,提高课程教学效率与质量是高校必须解决的重要课题。在“三全育人”的视域下,杭州师范大学从师范特性出发,以《数学分析》课程为示范构建了以SPOC混合式课程为基础的“141”协同育人模式。本文旨在深入剖析“141”协同育人模式的驱动机制、运行机制、保障机制三个育人机制,基于案例分析与多元回归法,对杭州师范大学数学系具有代表性的年级及班级学生《数学分析》课程的学习进行成效评估,以期总结并推广课程建设经验,并进行完善与改进。
At present, the learning effectiveness of college students is a hot topic in the research and practice of domestic colleges and universities, and improving the efficiency and quality of course teaching is an important issue that colleges and universities have to solve. Under the perspective of “three-pronged education”, Hangzhou Normal University (HZNU) has constructed a “141” collaborative education model based on SPOC blended courses with the course of Mathematical Analysis as a model from the perspective of teacher training. The purpose of this study is to analyze the driving mechanism, operating mechanism and guarantee mechanism of the “141” collaborative education model, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the learning of the Mathematical Analysis course in representative grades and classes in the Mathematics Department of Hangzhou Normal University based on the case study and multiple regression method, so as to summarize and popularize the experience of the course construction, and to perfect and improve it.
[1] | 范彦彬, 钱明霞, 赵磊磊. MOOC教学视频中教师课堂教学行为分析与改进研究——基于视频分析技术[J]. 数字教育, 2022, 8(2): 69-76. |
[2] | 杨开诚, 杜立梅. 基于活动的教学设计理论中学习内容分析和活动设计方法的探究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2003(8): 22-24. |
[3] | 康叶钦. 在线教育的“后MOOC时代”——SPOC解析[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2014, 35(1): 85-93.
https://doi.org/10.14138/j.1001-4519.2014.01.001 |
[4] | 白晓晶. 远程学习材料中的活动设计[J]. 开放教育研究, 2006(4): 88-91. |
[5] | 王鸿蕴, 戴国琳, 马爽. “双一流”高校教学科研协同育人模式研究[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2023, 41(11): 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.20037/j.issn.1671-1246.2023.11.01 |
[6] | 冷昕, 孙丽. 混合式教学在产学协同育人模式中的实践研究——以安徽师范大学ACCA方向班为例[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2022(8): 116-119. |
[7] | 欧阳鑫颖. 基于现代教育技术学基础理论创新研究[J]. 智库时代, 2018(42): 102+104. |
[8] | 江美芬. 学习评估: 高校学生学习质量提升的路径选择[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2019, 37(8): 45-48. |