The southeastern region of England, characterised by its geological setting, is particularly prone to dissolution features. These natural phenomena present substantial risks to both new and existing structures, as well as to the safety of the individuals inhabiting them. The potential repercussions of these hazards vary widely, spanning from minor issues like differential settlements to the gravest concern—the formation of sinkholes, which can lead to severe property damage and pose significant threats to lives. In response to these geological challenges, various methodologies have been employed to safeguard structures and communities. One such approach involves the strategic injection of compaction grouting. This paper’s primary focus is to comprehensively analyse the effectiveness of compaction grouting in a typical scenario where new properties are constructed over karstic areas, which are known for their complex and challenging geological characteristics. The findings and observations from this study strongly suggest that compaction grouting emerges as a highly effective solution for addressing karstic areas, particularly when other conventional mitigation techniques prove impractical. The depth and spatial distribution of dissolution features in such areas often limit the applicability of alternative methods. Compaction grouting, by contrast, demonstrates its ability to provide substantial reinforcement, enhancing the structural integrity of the ground and significantly reducing the risk associated with sinkhole formation and other related hazards. As such, it stands out as a valuable tool in the arsenal of strategies employed to protect against the geological challenges prevalent in the southeastern region of England.
References
[1]
Applied Geology Limited (1993) Review of Instability Due to Natural Underground Cavities in Great Britain. Contract No. PECD 7/1/280 for the Department of Environment. Applied Geology Ltd. Leamington Spa.
[2]
Edmonds, C.N. (2018) Review of Collapse Events on Chalk since 2000 and the Opportunities for Improved Engineering Practice. Proceedings of the Chalk 2018 Conference, London, 17-18 September, 53-73.
https://doi.org/10.1680/eiccf.64072.053
[3]
Edmonds, C.N. (2001a) Predicting Natural Cavities in Chalk. In: Griffiths, J.S., Ed., Land Surface Evaluation for Engineering Practice, Geological Society, Engineering Geology Special Publications, London, 29-38.
https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.ENG.2001.018.01.05
[4]
Lord, J.A., Clayton, C.R.I. and Mortimore, R.N. (2002) Engineering in Chalk CIRIA Report C574.
[5]
Byle, M.J. (2011) Managing Risk for Grouting in Karst in Geotechnical News. Vol. 29.
[6]
British Geological Survey (BGS) (2000) Reading. England and Walers Sheet 268. Solid and Drift Geology. 1:50,000.
NERC (1978) Hydrogeological Map of the South West Chiltern and the Berkshire and Marlborough Downs. https://mapapps2.bgs.ac.uk/geoindex/home.html
[9]
Jones, D.K.C. (1981) Southeast and Southern England. University Paperback, Methuen.
[10]
Edmonds, C.N. (2001b) Subsidence Hazard in Berkshire I Areas Underlain by Chalk Karst. In: Griffiths J.S., Ed., Land Surface Evaluation for Engineering Practice, Geological Society. Engineering Geology Special Publications, London, 97-106.
https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.ENG.2001.018.01.15
[11]
Rawlings, C.G., Hellawell, E.E. and Kilkenny, W.M. (2000) Grouting for Ground Engineering, CIRIA Report C514.
[12]
British Standard 2011 - BS EN 1097-2 (2011) Test for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates.