|
19世纪英国的社会保障与工人运动
|
Abstract:
19世纪早期,英国实行的新济贫法作为一种最低限度的社会保障,饱受争议,引起工人强烈不满与反对,但其作为最后一道防线,在避免英国工人激进主义运动走向暴力革命方面发挥了重要作用;19世纪中期的经济繁荣缓解了劳资矛盾,工会世界诞生了以维持工会会员最低生活水平为原则的“新精神”,这一“新精神”推崇与资本家谈判、调解、仲裁、公断等和平方式,进一步推动了工人阶级改良主义的发展;19世纪后期,特别是1973年的经济大萧条使许多工人失业,陷入贫困,生活水平严重下滑,新济贫法的兜底作用失去效用,工人罢工运动此起彼伏,推动英国现代社会保障制度逐步建立。
In the early 19th century, the new poor Law, as a minimum social security, was highly controver-sial and caused strong dissatisfaction and opposition among workers. However, as the last line of defense, it played an important role in preventing the radical movement of British workers from becoming violent revolution. In the middle of the 19th century, the economic prosperity eased the labor-capital conflict, and the “new spirit” was born in the trade union world based on the principle of maintaining the minimum living standard of trade union members. This “new spirit” advocated peaceful means such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration and arbitration judgment with capitalists, which further promoted the development of the working class. In the late 19th century, especially the Great economic depression in 1973, many workers lost their jobs and fell into poverty, and their living standards fell seriously. The backstop effect of the new poor Law lost its effect, and workers' strike movements emerged one after another, which gradually promoted the establishment of modern social security system in Britain.
[1] | 王雪. 19世纪英国工人运动改良主义倾向的再认识[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科版), 2003, 33(2): 79-83. |
[2] | 孟艳. 19世纪英国工人运动改良主义成因分析[J]. 科学社会主义, 2011(3): 140-142. |
[3] | 王可园, 郝宇青. 政治权利与阶级意识——19世纪英国议会改革对工人运动改良主义的影响[J]. 当代世界与社会主义, 2016(6): 155-161. |
[4] | 马克思恩格斯文集: 第3卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 601. |
[5] | 马克思恩格斯文集: 第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 531. |
[6] | Englander, D. (1998) Poverty and Poor Law Reform in Britain, 1834-1914. Longman, London. |
[7] | Blang, M. (1963) The Myth of the Old Poor Law and the Making of the New. Journal of Economic History, 2, 151-184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700103808 |
[8] | [英]甘米奇, R.G. 宪章运动史[M]. 苏公隽, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1979: 60. |
[9] | [英]韦伯夫妇. 英国工会运动史[M]. 陈建民, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1959: 127. |
[10] | Hill, C.P. (1985) British Economic and Social History, 1700-1982. Arnold, Dunmore. |
[11] | 钱乘旦, 许洁明. 英国通史[M]. 第2版. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 2007: 255. |
[12] | [英]西蒙?沙玛. 英国史(III) [M]. 刘巍, 翁家若, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2018: 175. |
[13] | McKay, S. and Rowlingson, K. (1999) Social Security in Britain. Macmillan Press Ltd, London.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27562-5 |
[14] | [英]汤普森, E.P. 英国工人积极的形成(上) [M]. 钱乘旦, 等, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2013: 269. |
[15] | Harley, J. (2015) Material Lives of the Poor and Their Strategic Use of the Workhouse during the Final Decades of the English Old Poor Law. Continuity and Change, 30, 71-103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416015000090 |
[16] | 李述森, 关娜. 暴力革命还是和平革命?——关于马恩无产阶级解放道路理论的历史考察[J]. 东岳论丛, 2020, 41(8): 150-158. |
[17] | [英]克拉潘. 现代英国经济史: 中卷[M]. 姚曾, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1975: 572. |
[18] | [英]西蒙?沙玛. 英国史(II) [M]. 彭灵, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2018: 178. |
[19] | [英]莫尔顿, 台德. 英国工人运动史1770-1920 [M]. 叶周, 何新, 等, 译. 北京: 生活?读书?新知三联书店, 1962: 111. |
[20] | 丁建定, 谢天. 论19世纪中后期英国的区别救济[J]. 社会保障评论, 2020, 4(4): 90-102. |
[21] | [英]玛格丽特?柯尔. 费边社史[M]. 杜安夏, 杜小敬, 等, 译. 何宗礼, 校. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1984: 17. |
[22] | 丁建定. 英国济贫法制度史[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2014: 251. |
[23] | 丁建定. 工人阶级与英国现代社会保障制度的建立[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2001, 41(6): 70-74. |
[24] | 丁建定. 英国现代社会保障制度的建立(1870-1914) [J]. 史学月刊, 2002(3): 81-90. |
[25] | 刘颖. 论20世纪初英国现代社会保障制度的初步确立[J]. 安徽史学, 2005(1): 12-16. |
[26] | 顾复. 试析十九世纪中叶至一战前夕英国工人状况的变化[J]. 苏州大学学报, 1996(3): 104-109. |
[27] | 吴铁稳, 张亚东. 19世纪中叶至一战前夕伦敦工人的住房状况[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 10(3): 92-96. |
[28] | Thane, P. (1984) The Working Class and State ‘Welfare’ in Britain, 1880-1914. The Historical Journal, 27, 877-900.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00018148 |
[29] | Clarkson, L.A. (1990) British Trade Union and Labour History: A Compendium. Macmillan Press Ltd., London.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10939-5 |