|
蒲松龄的科考“正途”与《聊斋》的“异型”书写
|
Abstract:
科考及创作是贯穿蒲松龄一生的两件大事。坚持科考“正途”体现了蒲松龄作为封建社会知识分子执著的人生态度及生命坚守。他有“高开低走”的科举经历,与同声相契的志士们相互唱和砥砺,书写了大量的同病相怜哀穷悼屈之作。另一方面,坚持创作“异路”则是作家在历经踬踣之后的生命“反转”。通过《聊斋》的“异型”书写,蒲松龄实现了精神的“突围”。作家为世人构筑异梦异境、异域异景,营造了温馨的精神家园与美好的生命愿景;描摹异人异事、异言异行,表达了深沉的文化情怀与进步的思想观念;书写异思异见、异理异韵,寄托了独特的审美理想与执着的价值追求;演绎异情异志、异彩异趣,体现了强烈的批判意识与顽强的反抗精神。《聊斋》创作奠定了蒲松龄在文学史的崇高地位,作家灵魂世界的涤荡升华与现实世界的守望相依“奇正相参”,二者浑然构成曲折而璀璨、复杂而纯净的生命历程。
The imperial examination and creation were two major events that ran through Pu Songling’s life. Adhering to the “normal path” of the imperial examination reflects Pu Songling’s persistent attitude towards life and perseverance as an intellectual in feudal society. He had the experience of “opening high and leaving low” in the imperial examination, and he sang and honed with fel-low patriots, wrote a large number of works that sympathize with the same illness, mourn for the poor, and mourn for the wrongs. On the other hand, insisting on creating a “different path” is the author’s life “reversal” after experiencing setbacks. Through the “heterotypic” writing of Liaozhai, Pu Songling achieved a spiritual “breakthrough”. The author has constructed exotic dreams and landscapes for the world, creating a warm spiritual home and a beautiful life vision; Describing different people and events, words and actions, expressing profound cultural senti-ments and progressive ideas; Writing different thoughts, opinions, and rhymes embodies unique aesthetic ideals and persistent value pursuits; Interpreting exotic emotions, aspirations, and colorful interests reflects a strong sense of criticism and a tenacious spirit of resistance. The creation of Liaozhai established Pu Songling’s lofty position in literary history, the purification and sublimation of the writer’s soul world and the watchfulness of the real world are interde-pendent and “strangely and positively intertwined”, the two constitute a tortuous and brilliant, complex and pure life process.
[1] | 鲁迅. 中国小说史略[M]. 苏州: 古吴轩出版社, 2017: 141. |
[2] | 刘富伟. 痴迷与困惑——蒲松龄科举心态解读[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2000(1): 77. |
[3] | 王福臣. 痴狂与反叛的两极人生——浅析蒲松龄科举心态变迁[J]. 蒲松龄研究, 2010(4): 5. |
[4] | 张志中, 李障天. 《郢中诗社》人物考[J]. 蒲松龄研究, 1992(3): 19-21. |
[5] | 王忠培. 清代乡试资格考试及其录取人数研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015: 2. |
[6] | 盛伟. 蒲松龄年谱(续) [J]. 蒲松龄研究, 1996(2): 4. |
[7] | 赵秒秒. 《聊斋志异》异境叙事研究[J]. 蒲松龄研究, 2022(2): 31-44. |
[8] | 李彦东. 论《聊斋志异》中的“异境” [J]. 《聊斋志异》研究, 2020(1): 13-21. |
[9] | 詹丹. 《聊斋志异》高珩序发微[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 47(4): 98-104. |
[10] | 中华书局编辑部. 谈狐说鬼第一书——《聊斋志异》[M]//聊斋志异. 北京: 中华书局, 2013: 前言. |
[11] | 申朝晖. 《聊斋志异》叙述思想研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2005: 74. |
[12] | 蒲松龄. 聊斋志异[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2013: 23-24. |
[13] | 马瑞芳. 蒲松龄和顾青霞[J]. 蒲松龄研究, 2015(2): 6. |
[14] | 张宇声. “蒲学”献疑: 张笃庆规劝过蒲松龄吗? [J]. 山东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(5): 81-86. |
[15] | 黄洽. 《聊斋志异》与宗教文化[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2005. |
[16] | 宋石青. 蒲松龄《促织》取材于明人小说[J]. 山西大学学报(哲社版), 1996(3): 49-51. |
[17] | 李桂奎. 论《聊斋志异》的灯前月下时空[J]. 蒲松龄研究, 1998(3): 55-65. |
[18] | 涂普生. 千年东坡今犹在——苏东坡在黄州的故事[N]. 眉山日报, 2022-07-01(007). |
[19] | 周先慎. 《聊斋志异》: 继承与总结[J]. 文史知识, 1995(7): 14-20. |
[20] | 郭预衡. 《中国古代文学史》(四) [M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1998: 333. |
[21] | 袁行霈. 《中国文学史》(第四卷) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999: 312. |
[22] | 吴承学. 古代兵法与文学批评[J]. 文学遗产, 1998(6): 2-12. |