Hydrological forecasting plays an important role in water resource
management, supporting socio-economic development and managing water-related
risks in river basins. There are many flow forecasting techniques that have
been developed several centuries ago, ranging from physical models,
physics-based models, conceptual models, and data-driven models. Recently,
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an advanced technique applied as an
effective data-driven model in hydrological forecasting. The main advantage of
these models is that they give results with compatible accuracy, and require
short computation time, thus increasing forecasting time and reducing human and
financial effort. This study evaluates the applicability of machine learning
and deep learning in Hanoi water level forecasting where it is controlled for
flood management and water supply in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Accordingly,
SANN (machine learning algorithm) and LSTM (deep learning algorithm) were
tested and compared with a Physics-Based Model (PBM) for the Red River Delta.
The results show that SANN and LSTM give high accuracy. The R-squared
coefficient is greater than 0.8, the mean squared error (MSE) is less than 20
cm, the correlation coefficient of the forecast hydrology is greater than 0.9
and the level of assurance of the forecast plan ranges from 80% to 90% in both
cases. In addition, the calculation time is much reduced compared to the
requirement of PBM, which is its limitation in hydrological forecasting for
large river basins such as the Red River in Vietnam. Therefore, SANN and LSTM
are expected to help increase lead time, thereby supporting water resource
management for sustainable development and management of water-related risks in
the Red River Delta.
References
[1]
Chen, H., Xu, C.Y. and Guo, S. (2012) Comparison and Evaluation of Multiple GCMs, Statistical Downscaling and Hydrological Models in the Study of Climate Change Impacts on Runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 434-435, 36-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.040
[2]
Chang, F.-J. and Guo, S. (2020) Advances in Hydrologic Forecasts and Water Resources Management. Water, 12, 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061819
[3]
Bidwell, V.J. and Griffiths, G.A. (1994) Adaptive Flood Forecasting: An Application to the Waimakariri River. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand), 32, 1-15.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43944722
[4]
Mai, D.T. and De Smedt, F.A. (2017) A Combined Hydrological and Hydraulic Model for Flood Prediction in Vietnam Applied to the Huong River Basin as a Test Case Study. Water, 9, 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110879
[5]
Ji, J., Choi, C., Yu, M. and Yi, J. (2012) Comparison of a Data-Driven Model and a Physical Model for Flood Forecasting. In Press, W., Ed., Flood Recovery Innovation and Response XI, 159, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.2495/FRIAR120111
[6]
Cordeiro, M., Wilson, H., Vanrobaeys, J., Pomeroy, J. and Fang, X. (2017) Simulating Cold-Region Hydrology in an Intensively Drained Agricultural Watershed in Manitoba, Canada, Using the Cold Regions Hydrological. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 3483-3506. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3483-2017
[7]
Aygün, O., Kinnard, C. and Campeau, S. (2020) Impacts of Climate Change on the Hydrology of Northern Midlatitude Cold Regions. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 2, 338-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319878123
[8]
Hu, C., Wu, Q., et al. (2018) Deep Learning with a Long Short-Term Memory Networks Approach for Rainfall-Runoff Simulation. Water, 10, 1543.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111543
[9]
Wee, W.Z. (2021) A Review of Models for Water Level Forecasting Based on Machine Learning. Earth Science Informatics, 14, 1707-1728.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00664-9
[10]
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2008) The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, Stanford, 745. https://hastie.su.domains/Papers/ESLII.pdf
[11]
Irving, K., Kuemmerlen, M., et al. (2018) A High-Resolution Streamflow and Hydrological Metrics Dataset for Ecological Modeling Using a Regression Model. Scientific Data, 5, 180224. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.224
[12]
Afan, H.A., Allawi, M.F., El-Shafie, A., et al. (2020) Input Attributes Optimization Using the Feasibility of Genetic Nature Inspired Algorithm: Application of River Flow Forecasting. Scientific Report, 10, 4684.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61355-x
[13]
Agudelo-Otálora, L.M., Moscoso-Barrera, W.D., et al. (2020) Comparison of Physical Models and Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Flood Levels. SciELO Mexico, 9, 209-236.
[14]
Devienne, S. (2006) Red River Delta: Fifty Years of Changes. Moussons, 9-10, 255-280. https://doi.org/10.4000/moussons.2042
[15]
Giuliani, M., Castelletti, A. and Pianosi, E., et al. (2016) Curses, Tradeoffs, and Scalable Management: Advancing Evolutionary Multi-Objective Direct Policy Search to Improve Water Reservoir Operations. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 142, 04105050.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000570
[16]
Soncini-Sessa, R., Weber, E. and Castelletti, A. (2007) Integrated and Participatory Water Resources Management-Theory. Elsevier Science.
https://shop.elsevier.com/books/integrated-and-participatory-water-resources- management-theory/soncini-sessa/978-0-444-53013-4
[17]
Galelli, S. and Castelletti, A. (2013) Tree-Based Iterative Input Variable Selection for Hydrological Modeling. Water Resources Research, 49, 4295-4310.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20339
[18]
Meng, C., Zhou, J., Tayyab, M., Zhu, S. and Zhang, H. (2016) Integrating Artificial Neural Networks into the VIC Model. Water, 8, 407.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w8090407