全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

自然腔道取直肠癌标本的进展研究
Progressive Study on Obtaining Rectal Cancer Specimens through Natural Orifices

DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13102324, PP. 16602-16607

Keywords: 结直肠癌,腹腔镜,经自然腔道取标本,加速康复外科
Colorectal Carcinoma
, Laparoscopy, Natural Orifice Specimen Extractions (NOSES), Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在过去的30年里,结直肠手术已经发展到包括微创手术技术。微创手术与减少术后疼痛、减少伤口并发症、更早恢复肠道功能以及可能缩短住院时间有关。与开放手术相比,这些好处归因于手术创伤的减少。通过“微型剖腹手术”在结直肠手术中提取标本的需要会抵消微创手术的许多优势。自然孔道标本提取则体现了巨大的优势,例如阴道或远端胃肠道,以取出标本。该技术的前提是减少移除标本所需的创伤,并期望这可以改善结果。与传统标本提取相比,在使用NOSE的结直肠手术中观察到术后镇痛药使用减少、肠功能恢复更快和住院时间更短。
In the past 30 years, colorectal surgery has evolved to include minimally invasive surgical tech-niques. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with reducing postoperative pain, reducing wound complications, restoring intestinal function earlier, and possibly shortening hospital stay. Compared to open surgery, these benefits are attributed to a reduction in surgical trauma. The need to extract specimens during colorectal surgery through “mini laparotomy” will offset many of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The extraction of natural pore specimens demonstrates significant advantages, such as the vagina or distal gastrointestinal tract, in order to extract specimens. The premise of this technology is to reduce the trauma required to remove specimens, and it is expected that this can improve the results. Compared to traditional specimen extraction, reduced postopera-tive analgesic use, faster intestinal function recovery, and shorter hospital stay were observed in colorectal surgery using NOSE.

References

[1]  Izquierdo, K.M., Unal, E. and Marks, J.H. (2018) Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction in Colorectal Surgery: Patient Se-lection and Perspectives. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 11, 265-279.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S135331
[2]  乔祥社, 张志松, 杭健, 赵宏久, 郭攀华, 卞锐, 胡光龙. 经自然腔道取标本在结直肠癌手术治疗中的临床疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国医药科学, 2020, 10(17): 53-59.
[3]  Ren, L., Zhu, D., Wei, Y., et al. (2012) Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program Attenuates Stress and Accelerates Recovery in Patients after Radical Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. World Journal of Surgery, 36, 407-414.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1348-4
[4]  Melloul, E., Hübner, M., Scott, M., et al. (2016) Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World Journal of Surgery, 40, 2425-2440.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1
[5]  Shen, M.Y. and Chen, W.T.L. (2020) Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) with Single-Stapling Anastomosis for Left Colon Cancer. Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 23, 201-203.
https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2020.23.4.201
[6]  Liu, Z., Efetov, S., Guan, X., et al. (2019) A Multicenter Study Evaluating Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Rectal Cancer. Journal of Surgical Research, 243, 236-241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.034
[7]  (2017) Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fast-ing and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Anesthesiology, 126, 376-393.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452
[8]  Kayaalp, C. and Yagci, M.A. (2015) Laparoscopic Right Colon Resection with Transvaginal Extraction: A Systematic Review of 90 Cases. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 25, 384-391.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000124
[9]  Anania, G., Arezzo, A., Davies, R.J., Marchetti, F., Zhang, S., Di Saverio, S., Cirocchi, R. and Donini, A. (2021) A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Laparoscopic vs Open Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 36, 1609-1620.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0
[10]  China NOSES Alliance, Professional Committee of Natural Ori-fice Specimen Extraction Surgery and Colorectal Cancer Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association (2019) Ex-pert Consensus of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Colorectal Neoplasm (2019). Chinese Journal of Col-orectal Disease Template, 8, 336-342.
[11]  Brincat, S.D., Lauri, J. and Cini, C. (2022) Natural Orifice versus Trans-abdominal Specimen Extraction in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis. BJS Open, 6, zrac074.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac074
[12]  Zhang, M., Liu, Z. and Wang, X. (2022) Is Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery the Future Direction of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery? Surgery Open Science, 18, 106-110.
[13]  Wang, X., Efetov, S.K., Liu, Z., Medkova, Y.S., Kitsenko, Y.E., Picciariello, A., Tulina, I.A. and Tsarkov, P.V. (2020) Transrectal Specimen Extraction after Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Extended D3 Lymph Node Dissection (Anterior Medial to Lateral Approach)—A Video Vignette. Colorectal Disease, 22, 471-472.
https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14929
[14]  Nishimura, A., Kawahara, M., Kawachi, Y., Hasegawa, J., Makino, S., Kitami, C., Nakano, T., Otani, T., Nemoto, M., Hattori, S. and Nikkuni, K. (2022) Totally Laparoscopic Resection of Right-Sided Colon Cancer Using Transvaginal Specimen Extraction with a 10-mm-Long Abdominal Incision. Tech-niques in Coloproctology, 26, 755-760.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02636-7
[15]  Wolthuis, A.M., Fieuws, S., Van Den Bosch, A., de Buck van Overstraeten, A. and D’Hoore, A. (2015) Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Colectomy with or without Natu-ral-Orifice Specimen Extraction. British Journal of Surgery, 102, 630-637.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9757
[16]  Kudsi, O.Y., Gokcal, F., Bou-Ayash, N. and Chudner, A. (2021) Robotic Sigmoidectomy for Diverticulitis—Natural Orifice Extraction with Stapleless Hand-Sewn Intracorporeal Anastomosis. Colorectal Disease, 23, 1919-1923.
https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15624
[17]  China NOSES Alliance (2017) Expert Consensus of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Colorectal Neoplasm (2017 Edition). Chinese Journal of Colorectal Disease, 6, 266-272.
[18]  Abu Gazala, M. and Wexner, S.D. (2017) Re-Appraisal and Consideration of Minimally Invasive Sur-gery in Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology Report, 5, 1-10.
[19]  Guan, X., Hu, X., Jiang, Z., et al. (2022) Short-Term and Oncological Outcomes of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) for Colorectal Cancer in China: A National Database Study of 5055 Patients. Science Bulletin, 67, 1331-1334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.05.014
[20]  Yagci, M.A., Kayaalp, C. and Novruzov, N.H. (2014) Intracorpo-real Mesenteric Division of the Colon Can Make the Specimen More Suitable for Natural Orifice Extraction. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 24, 484-486.
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0116
[21]  Nishimura, A., Kawahara, M., Honda, K., et al. (2013) Totally Laparo-scopic Anterior Resection with Transvaginal Assistance and Transvaginal Specimen Extraction: A Technique for Natural Orifice Surgery Combined with Reduced- Port Surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 27, 4734-4740.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3120-3
[22]  Zhao, Q., Wu, L., Yang, F., Han, S. and Xing, N. (2023) Appli-cation of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Urological Surgery. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 33, 231-235.
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2022.0369
[23]  China Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Alliance (2019) Consensus of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Gastric Cancer (2019). Chinese Journal of Gastrointesti-nal Surgery, 22, 711-714.
[24]  Feng, X., Morandi, A., Boehne, M., et al. (2015) 3-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Im-proves Operating Time in Small Spaces without Impact on Hemodynamics and Psychomental Stress Parameters of the Surgeon. Surgical Endoscopy, 29, 1231-1239.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4083-3
[25]  Tsarkov, P.V., Efetov, S.K., Tulina, I.A., Kitsenko, Y.E., Picciariello, A., Kim, V.D. and Solodovnikova, A.K. (2019) Robotic Trans-vaginal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Sigmoidectomy with Extended D3 Lymph Node Dissection for Cancer—A Video Vignette. Colorectal Disease, 21, 732-733.
https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14633
[26]  Guan, X., Liu, Z., Lon-go, A., et al. (2019) International Consensus on Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) for Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology Report, 7, 24-31.
https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goy055
[27]  Sparreboom, C.L., van Groningen, J.T., Lingsma, H.F., et al. (2018) Different Risk Factors for Early and Late Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in a Nationwide Audit. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 61, 1258-1266.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001202
[28]  Zhang, M., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., et al. (2022) Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Totally Laparoscopic Right Colectomy and Laparoscopic-Assisted Right Colectomy: A Retrospective Study in a Single Institution on 300 Consecutive Patients. Surgical Endoscopy, 36, 176-184.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08252-6
[29]  Zhang, M., Lu, Z., Hu, X., et al. (2022) Comparison of the Short-Term Outcomes between Intracorporeal Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Totally Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis for Right Colectomy: A Retrospective Study on 214 Consecutive Patients. Surgery Open Science, 9, 7-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.03.006
[30]  Wang, S., Tang, J., Sun, W., Yao, H.Y. and Li, Z. (2022) The Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Compared with Conventional Laparoscopy for Colorectal Cancer: A Me-ta-Analysis of Efficacy and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes. International Journal of Surgery, 97, 106196.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106196
[31]  Zhang, M., Hu, X., Guan, X., et al. (2022) Surgical Outcomes and Sexual Function after Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Surgery with Transvaginal versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study. International Journal of Surgery, 104, Article ID: 106787.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106787
[32]  Scarborough, J.E., Mantyh, C.R., Sun, Z., et al. (2015) Combined Mechanical and Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation Reduces Incisional Surgical Site Infection and Anastomotic Leak Rates after Elective Colorectal Resection: An Analysis of Colectomy—Targeted ACS NSQIP. Annals of Surgery, 262, 331-337.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001041
[33]  Taylor, J.S., Marten, C.A., Munsell, M.F., et al. (2017) The DISINFECT Initiative: Decreasing the Incidence of Surgical INFECTions in Gynecologic Oncology. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 24, 362-368.
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5517-4
[34]  Madrid, E., Urrútia, G., Roqué i Figuls, M., et al. (2016) Active Body Surface Warming Systems for Preventing Complications Caused by Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia in Adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD009016.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009016.pub2
[35]  de Leede, E.M., van Leersum, N.J., Kroon, H.M., et al. (2018) Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Chewing Gum after Abdominal Surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 105, 820-828.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10828
[36]  Fagarasanu, A., Alotaibi, G.S., Hrimiuc, R., et al. (2016) Role of Extended Thromboprophylaxis after Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Re-view and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 23, 1422- 1430.
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5127-1

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133