|
论版权不当商业维权及其司法规制策略——一个扩张解释论视角
|
Abstract:
近年来,我国出现了借保护著作权为形,实则以“虚构权利”“放水养鱼”“夸示权利”等不诚信行为谋取非法利益的不当商业维权。为了减轻其对版权流通生态的不良影响与避免大量小微经营者的经济损失。本文通过2021年“绍兴轻纺城”事件引入,采文献分析和比较法方法归纳当前该领域学理与法制应对措施的不足之处,同时围绕诚实信用原则对版权维权中的“不当因素”予以扩张解释,尝试于诉讼中构建依申请、倒查既往判例的审查程序,提议司法者可通过“自由心证”将“不当”和“批量”结合为一种整体的行为予以精准识别与动态惩戒。
In recent years, there has been a concerning trend in China characterized by the exploitation of copyright maintenance as a pretext, while clandestinely engaging in deceptive practices such as the assertion of “fictional rights”, “laissez-faire loss”, and “exaggerated entitlements” for the purpose of illicit economic gains. In order to mitigate its negative impact on the current copyright circulation ecosystem and the economic losses of a large number of small and micro-scale operators. The paper introduces the “China Textile City” incident in 2021, uses literature analysis and comparative law methods to clarify the shortcomings of current academic and legal theories in the field of copyright maintenance. At the same time, it expands and explains the “inappropriate factors” in copyright maintenance around the principle of good faith, and attempts to construct a review procedure based on application and reviewing previous precedents in litigation. Propose that law-officer can accurately identify and dynamically punish “inappropriate” combine with “batch” behaviors as a whole through “free heart syndrome”.
[1] | 范雯. 破解版权商业维权困境的路径——基于确权的视角[J]. 国际人才交流, 2021(12): 41-43. |
[2] | 安海涛, 薛潇. 知产维权诉讼走向产业化[N]. 人民法院报, 2012-08-05(003). |
[3] | 邓新建, 林劲标, 李世寅. 谨防“批量维权”成生财之道[N]. 法制日报, 2011-05-24(004). |
[4] | 汪敏, 王洪友. 权利支撑力视域下版权商业维权问题探讨[J]. 郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版), 2022, 41(4): 35-39. |
[5] | 范跃红, 胡成英. “海量维权”的背后, 是打假还是诈骗——数字赋能揭开花样图案著作权恶意维权真相[EB/OL].
http://newspaper.jcrb.com/2023/20230203/20230203_004/20230203_004_1.htm, 2023-02-03. |
[6] | 张德芬, 张炎坤. 论版权“钓鱼维权”行为的法律规制[J].广东开放大学学报,2022,31(01):37-43. |
[7] | 王晓磊. 当免费图片遭遇“钓鱼维权”[J]. 法人, 2019(5): 66-67+4. |
[8] | GDUSA. 《美国平面设计》杂志2016年图片库用户调查[EB/OL]. (GDUSA 拍照的)
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/jqsXWigDI_IYE1SvCs4sNA, 2016-11-02. |
[9] | 郭亮, 崔蕊麟. “版权蟑螂”的性质界定及著作权法规制[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2023(1): 216-232. |
[10] | 刘彤. “版权蟑螂”式维权: “视觉中国”系列网络事件反思[J]. 传媒, 2019(23): 87-89. |
[11] | Greenberg, B.A. (2015) Copyright Trolls and the Common Law. Iowa Law Review Bulletin, 100, 77-86. |
[12] | 李欣洋, 张宇庆. 版权蟑螂现象之法律规制——以法定赔偿制度为视角[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2018, 33(2): 133-141. |
[13] | 卢文道. 立法滞后与法官自由裁量权[J]. 法学, 1997(8): 36-37. |
[14] | 陈为. 音乐短片作品小权利人批量诉讼维权模式研究[J]. 人民司法, 2021(28): 43-47. |
[15] | 李铁柱. 最高法谈“黑洞”版权: 虚构版权牟利不保护[EB/OL].
https://m.huanqiu.com/article/9CaKrnKjYPP, 2019-04-23. |
[16] | 顾培东. 能动司法若干问题研究[J]. 中国法学, 2010(4): 5-26. |
[17] | 张文显, 主编. 法理学[M]. 第5版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018: 293-294. |
[18] | 法治鄞州. 联防联动, 筑起虚假诉讼的第一道屏障!律协鄞州分会助力防范虚假诉讼“五个一”工作机制[EB/OL]. (微信公众号“法治鄞州”) https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/q_lGtqYCydm3--2bQPCTIg, 2021-04-23. |
[19] | 郭吉刚. 新黄河客户端. 全景视觉再掀“批量维权”, 一天起诉10家企业, 5年打25000多起官司[EB/OL].
https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_21511931, 2023-01-11. |