|
用能权交易市场法制检视与构建——以交易主体为向度
|
Abstract:
迄今为止,用能权交易市场仍处于试点探索时期,尽管用能权交易市场规则体系已经初步形成,试点市场取得初步成效,但在交易主体这一微观层面仍存在主体标准设置不清、范围过于狭窄、与其它制度主体交叉重叠等问题。究其本源在于作为交易核心的用能权权属不明、电子交易平台信息披露欠缺;就其完善路径而言,应在借鉴域外白色证书的基础上,完善国家立法、构建多元化交易主体、探寻环境权益之间的联合履约机制。
Up to now, the energy right trading market is still in the period of pilot exploration. Although the rules system of the energy right trading market has been initially formed and the pilot market has achieved initial results, there are still some problems at the micro level of the trading subject, such as unclear standard setting, too narrow scope and overlapping with other institutional subjects. Its origin lies in the unclear ownership of the right to use energy as the core of the transaction and the lack of information disclosure on the electronic trading platform; its perfect path should be based on drawing lessons from foreign white certificates, improving national legislation, building a diversified trading body, and exploring a joint implementation mechanism between environmental rights and interests.
[1] | 任洪涛. 民法典实施背景下碳排放权数据产权属性的法理证成及规范进路[J]. 法学杂志, 2022, 43(6): 117-130. |
[2] | 周元松. 环境风险规制新论[J]. 洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35(5): 43-47. |
[3] | 丰月, 冯铁拴. 管制、共治与组合: 环境政策工具新思考[J]. 中国石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 34(4): 50-57. |
[4] | 张宝. 规制内涵变迁与现代环境法的演进[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2020, 30(12): 155-163. |
[5] | 陈若英. 感性与理性之间的选择——评《气候变化正义》和减排规制手段[J]. 政法论坛, 2013, 31(2): 121-130. |
[6] | 莫神星. 能源法学[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2019. |
[7] | 郑鹏程, 张妍钰. “双碳”目标实现的市场化路径及其制度完善[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 36(4): 107-112. |
[8] | 张富利, 林书海. 我国碳排放权交易法律构造的疏失及完善[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(2): 24-30. |
[9] | 韩英夫, 黄锡生. 论用能权的法理属性及其立法探索[J]. 理论与改革, 2017(4): 159-169. |
[10] | 刘明明. 论构建中国用能权交易体系的制度衔接之维[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2017, 27(10): 217-224. |
[11] | 唐方方, 李金兵, 姜超, 苏良, 宗计川. 中国的节能量交易机制设计[J]. 节能与环保, 2010(12): 26-29. |
[12] | 刘海英, 王钰. 用能权与碳排放权可交易政策组合下的经济红利效应[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2019, 29(5): 1-10. |
[13] | 高红. 我国用能权与碳排放权协同协调机制研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2021. |