Faced with the depletion of fossil energy resources and given the current context of the fight against climate change, Renewable Energies (RE) represent an increasingly growing challenge. Of all these energies, those resulting from the biomethanization of biomass now provide an opportunity in the world of farmers and breeders. The treatment of agro-pastoral residues by anaerobic digestion has been the subject of renewed interest in recent years, thanks in particular to the production of energy from biomass, not to mention the production of fertilizers from effluents. Expelled from the digesters. This method of transformation offers many environmental, socio-economic and agricultural interests. Indeed, the biogas obtained from organic matter allows, among other things, to cook, light houses, and produce electricity and heat. The objective of this study is to compare the construction techniques and costs of the biodigester models that exist in Senegal. There are many biodigesters, the choice of an installation depends on the available space and the nature of the soil. Several types of biodigester technologies are installed in Senegal. The GGC 2047 fixed dome, the RMB geomembrane and the BEG geomembrane. First we will describe the construction techniques of the modified GGC model fixed dome biodigester, then of the RMB model geomembrane and finally of the BEG model geomembrane.
References
[1]
Senegal National BIOGAS Program. https://pnb.sn/
[2]
Heeb, F. (2009) Decentralised Anaerobic Digestion of Market Waste. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 135, 91-97.
[3]
Reza, A. and Hamed, R. (2020) Techno-Economic Analysis of Electrical Energy Generation from Urban Waste in Hamadan, Iran. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 15, 337-341. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.150307
[4]
Luo, L.W. and Wang, J.W.C. (2019) Enhanced Food Waste Degradation in Integrated Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion: Effect of Leachate Recirculation Ratio. Bioresource Technology, 291, Article ID: 121813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121813
[5]
Sorensen, A., Lübeck, M., Lübeck, P.S. and Ahring, B.K. (2013) Fungal Beta-Glucosidases: A Bottleneck in Industrial Use of Lignocellulosic Materials. Biomolecules, 3, 612-631. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom3030612
[6]
Morero, B., Groppelli, E.S. and Campanella, E.A. (2017) Evaluation of Biogas Upgrading Technologies Using a Response Surface Methodology for Process Simulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 978-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.167
[7]
Clarence, T., Alexander, R.K. and Shunsuke, M. (2019) Green Bonds for the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Research Letters, 14. Article ID: 064009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1118
[8]
Pieri, C. (1989) Fertility of Savannah Lands. Review of 30 Years of Agricultural Research and Development South of the Sahara. Ministry of Cooperation and CIRAD/ IRAT Publishers, Montpellier. (in French)
[9]
Mustin, M. (1987) Compost: Management of Organic Matter. Editions Francois Dubusc, Paris. (in French)
[10]
Pichot, J.P., Sedogo, M.P., Poulain, J.F. and Arrivets, J. (1981) Evolution of the Fertility of a Tropical Ferruginous Soil under the Influence of Mineral and Organic Manures. Tropical Agronomy, 36, 122-133. (in French)
[11]
Farinet, J.L. and Sarr, P.L. (1989) Role of Composting in Maintaining the Productivity of a Millet Crop in an Arid Zone. In: Roger, B. and Hervé, S.M., eds., Agronomy and Natural Resources in Tropical Regions: Proceedings of the DRN Days, IRAT/CIRAD Publisher, Montpellier.