目的论下《安徒生童话》两汉译本差异探析
An Investigation on the Difference between the Two Translational Versions of Andersen’s Fairy Tales Based on Skopostheory

关于《安徒生童话》的研究要么是聚焦于它对中国儿童文学的影响，要么就是研究它与安徒生本人或他本人创作的初衷，很少聚焦于不同《安徒生童话集》中译本的差异。然而，即使是《安徒生童话》中译本之间也存在着不同方面的差异。本文选取赵景深与叶君健的《安徒生童话集》中译本为例，在汉斯？弗米尔目的论的指导下，尝试分析《安徒生童话》中译本之间存在怎样差异，目的论在这两个译本的差异中又扮演了怎样的角色。研究发现，选取不同目标读者会对译者所译版本产生影响，不但如此，译者所生活的时代以及译者对源文本的理解也会对所译内容产生相同的效果。
Research on Andersen’s Fairy Tales only either focuses on its influence on Chinese children litera-ture, its relationship with Andersen himself or his original intention of creating it, seldomly con-centrating on the different Chinese translational versions. However, even the Chinese translational versions vary from one aspect to another. This paper, taking the translational version of Zhao Jingshen and Ye Junjian as examples, based on Hans Vemeer’s skopostheory, tries to analyze how the Chinese translational version of Andersen’s Fairy Tales vary from with each other, in what aspect do they vary, and how the skopostheory play the role in these two translational versions. What has been found is that not only the target reader will affect the translator’s version, but also the time translator lives in and translator’s understanding towards the source text will take the same effect.