全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Predisposed Agency: A New Term for Free Will Because Our Will Isn’t So Free

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2023.134040, PP. 621-645

Keywords: Predisposed Agency, Agency, Free Will, Libertarian Free Will, Partial Free Will, Limited Free Will, Compatibilism, Classical Compatibilism, Determinism, Determinists, Moral Luck, Responsibility, Blame, Praise, Stanford Prison Experiment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper proposes that we rename free will, also called libertarian free will, to the more accurate characterization of “predisposed agency.” This is needed for two reasons: First, classical compatibilists have redefined free will to mean something quite different than and in fact contrary to libertarian free will, and thus have introduced needless confusion into the concept. More importantly, even those who believe in libertarian free will recognize that our will is not so free in that we are predisposed toward the decisions we make and the actions we take due to our genetics and our environment, which include our temperament, our character, our past experiences, our past decisions, our habits, the people we have been with, and the situations we find ourselves in, among other things. But the term “free will” totally ignores the fact that we are predisposed toward certain actions. The danger in this is that if we use the lexicon of free will, and believe in free will, then we are apt to judge others harshly for their actions since if they have free will then it would seem they bear both full responsibility and blame for their actions. But this seems unfair since each of us is predisposed to think, decide, and act as we do. The author proposes a distinction between having responsibility and deserving blame and praise. Specifically, it is argued that if we do have agency (or libertarian free will) then we are fully responsible for what we do, but due to our predispositions, which we necessarily and unavoidably have and are often largely out of our control, we frequently do not deserve full blame or praise.

References

[1]  AddictionHelp (2023). Addiction Recovery Statistics.
https://www.addictionhelp.com/recovery/statistics/
[2]  American Addiction Centers (2023). Genetics vs Heredity: What’s the Difference. Environmental and Other Contributing Factors.
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/addiction-genetics
[3]  Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions (Revised and Expanded ed.). Harper Perennial.
[4]  Baker, L., Tuvblad, C., & Raine, A. (2010). Genetics and Crime. In E. McLaughlin, & T. Newburn (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Criminology Theory (pp. 21-39). Sage Publications.
[5]  Balaguer, M. (2004). A Coherent, Naturalistic, and Plausible Formulation of Libertarian Free Will. Noûs, 38, 379-406.
[6]  Balaguer, M. (2009). Why There Are No Good Arguments for Any Interesting Version of Determinism. Synthese, 168, 1-21.
[7]  Balaguer, M. (2014). Free Will. The MIT Press.
[8]  Balaguer, M. (2019). Free Will, Determinism, and Epiphenomenalism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2623.
[9]  Chang, R. (2012). Are Hard Choices Cases of Incomparability? Philosophical Issues, 22, 106-126.
[10]  Dickerson, K. (2014). Is There a Happiness Gene? Live Science.
https://www.livescience.com/46877-denmark-happiness-genetics.html
[11]  Firestone, R. (2017). An Argument for Libertarian Free Will: Hard Choices Based on either Incomparable or Equally Persuasive Reasons. Open Journal of Philosophy, 7, 64-93.
[12]  Frankel, M. (2021). Is Quantum Theory Really as Random as It Seems? New Scientist.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2288232-is-quantum-theory-really-as-random-as-it-seems/
[13]  Fried, I., Mukamel, R., & Kreiman, G. (2011). Internally Generated Preactivation of Single Neurons in Human Medial Frontal Cortex Predicts Volition. Neuron, 69, 548-562.
[14]  Haynes, J. D. (2011). Decoding and Predicting Intentions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224, 9-21.
[15]  Haynes, J. D. (2016). The Brain-Computer Duel: Do We Have Free Will? EurekAlert.
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/899306
[16]  Hibbing, J., Smith, K., & Alford, J. (2014). Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[17]  Jones, C., Noonan, R., & Compton, W. (2020). Prevalence and Correlates of Ever Having a Substance Use Problem and Substance Use Recovery Status among Adults in the United States, 2018. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 214, Article 108169.
[18]  Lavazza, A. (2016). Free Will and Neuroscience: From Explaining Freedom Away to New Ways of Operationalizing and Measuring It. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 262.
[19]  Libet, B. (1983). Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Cerebral Potential. Brain, 106, 623-642.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623
[20]  Live Science Staff (2022). Personality Set for Life by 1st Grade, Study Suggests.
https://www.livescience.com/8432-personality-set-life-1st-grade-study-suggests.html
[21]  Nagel, T. (1976). Moral Luck. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. In L. Pojman (Ed.), Classics of Philosophy: The Twentieth Century (Vol. III, pp. 367-374). Oxford University Press.
[22]  Nahmias, E. (2015). Why We Have Free Will. Scientific American, 312, 77-79.
[23]  Nahmias, E. (2018). Your Brain as the Source of Free Will Wanting: Understanding Free Will in the Age of Neuroscience. In G. Caruso, & O. Flanagan (Eds.), Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience (pp. 251-268). Oxford University Press.
https://philarchive.org/rec/NAHYBA
[24]  Nietzsche, F. (1887). On The Genealogy of Morals. In Basic Writings of Nietzsche (Kaufman, W. Trans.). The Modern Library/Random House.
[25]  Resurgence Behavioral Health (2023).
https://resurgencebehavioralhealth.com/blog/what-percentage-of-addicts-get-better/
[26]  Sartre, J. P. (1943). Being and Nothingness (Barnes, H. Trans.). Washington Square Press.
[27]  Sartre, J. P. (1946). The Humanism of Existentialism. From Existentialism and Human Emotion. In C. Guignon, & D. Pereboom (Eds.), Existentialism Basic Writings (2nd ed., pp. 290-308, Frechtman, B. Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
[28]  Schultze-Kraft, M. (2015). The Point of No Return in Vetoing Self-Initiated Movements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 1080-1085.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513569112
[29]  Schurger, A., Pengbo, H., Pak, J., & Roskies, A. (2021). What Is the Readiness Potential? Trends in Cognitive Science, 25, 558-570.
[30]  Shapiro, D. (1998). Addiction and Drug Policy. In J. White (Ed.), Contemporary Moral Problems (9th ed., pp. 298-304). Thomson Wadsworth.
[31]  Shermer, M. (2006). The Political Brain. Scientific American, July Issue.
[32]  Soon, C., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., & Haynes, J. D. (2008). Unconscious Determinants of Free Decisions in the Human Brain. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 543-545.
[33]  Stanford Prison Experiment (2023).
https://www.prisonexp.org/
[34]  Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (2023).
https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/priv/pep12-recdef.pdf
[35]  Trevena, J., & Miller, J. (2010). Brain Preparation before a Voluntary Action: Evidence against Unconscious Movement Initiation. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 447-456.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.006
[36]  Wikipedia (2023a). Mutation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation
[37]  Wikipedia (2023b). Quantum Mechanics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
[38]  Wikipedia (2023c). Stanford Prison Experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133