全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

共情对攻击行为的影响
The Effects of Empathy on Aggressive Behavior

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.139483, PP. 3856-3861

Keywords: 共情,攻击行为,愤怒,共情失调,人际相似性
Empathy
, Aggressive Behavior, Rage, Empathy Disorder, Interpersonal Similarity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

共情是一种与个体情绪、人际交往行为有着密切联系的因素。本研究以网络社交情境为背景,探讨了共情与攻击行为、愤怒情绪间的关系,以及人际相似性在其中起到重要调节作用。总结发现,一般情况下,共情能力缺乏的个体由于共情失调,有着更高的攻击性;但对于共情能力正常的群体而言,当处在缺乏情境线索的情境中时,人际相似性越高,情感共情能力更高的个体反而易做出攻击行为。未来研究可以针对共情能力健全的个体,用实证研究方法考察社交网络中的欺凌现象与共情、愤怒情绪的关系,并进一步探究其中的作用机制,这对于深入了解共情结构与反应以及促进人际交往和社会和谐有着重要意义。
Empathy is a factor that is closely linked to individual emotions and interpersonal behaviors. In this study, the relationship between empathy and aggressive behavior and angry emotions, and the important moderating role of interpersonal similarity in them, were explored in the context of online social situations. In conclusion, it was found that in general, individuals with a lack of empa-thy have higher aggression due to empathic dysregulation; however, for a group with normal em-pathy, when in a situation lacking situational cues, the higher the interpersonal similarity, the higher the emotional empathy, the more prone to aggression individuals are instead. Future studies can examine the relationship between bullying in social networks and empathy and anger emotions with empirical research methods for individuals with sound empathic ability, and further explore the mechanisms involved, which is of great significance for a deeper understanding of empathic structure and response as well as for the promotion of interpersonal communication and social harmony.

References

[1]  曹思琪, 刘勋, 伍海燕(2021). 共情可控?以自上而下视角考察共情的可调节性. 心理科学进展, 29(8), 1420-1429.
[2]  陈慧, 何婷, 唐远琼, 唐怡欣, 陆风勇, 蔺秀云(2021). 共情与青少年内外化问题的关系及影响机制. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 439-446.
[3]  陈武英, 刘连启(2016). 情境对共情的影响. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 91-100.
[4]  邓琳, 罗品超, 王俊芳, 方俊聪, 郑晓纯, 李悦, 郑希付(2014). 不对称情绪分享过程中情绪反应自我指向增强效应的初探. 心理学报, 46(8), 1103-1111.
[5]  丁凤琴, 陆朝晖(2016). 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1159-1174.
[6]  侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃(2017). 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角. 心理学报, (12), 1548-1558.
[7]  竭婧, 庄梦迪, 罗品超, 郑希付(2017). 神经科学视角下的共情研究热点. 心理科学进展, 25(11), 1922-1931.
[8]  敬娇娇, 高闯, 胡安凯, 耿秋月(2017). 共情对不同网络欺负角色行为的影响. 应用心理学, 23(3), 267-277.
[9]  敬娇娇, 高闯, 牛更枫(2017). 互联网使用对共情的影响. 心理科学进展, 25(4), 652-661.
[10]  赖丽足, 任志洪, 颜懿菲, 牛更枫, 赵春晓, 罗梅, 张琳(2021). 共情的双刃剑效应: COVID-19心理热线咨询师的继发性创伤应激和替代性创伤后成长. 心理学报, 53(9), 992-1002.
[11]  刘聪慧, 王永梅, 俞国良, 王拥军(2009). 共情的相关理论评述及动态模型探新. 心理科学进展, (5), 964-972.
[12]  刘富丽, 苏彦捷(2017). 暴力媒体使用与儿童青少年共情关系的元分析. 心理技术与应用, 5(10), 586-595.
[13]  潘彦谷, 刘衍玲, 冉光明, 雷浩, 马建苓, 滕召军(2013). 动物和人类的利他本性: 共情的进化. 心理科学进展, (7), 1229-1238.
[14]  邱方晖, 罗跃嘉, 贾世伟(2016). 个体攻击性对愤怒表情类别知觉的影响. 心理学报, 48(8), 946-956.
[15]  苏金龙, 苏彦捷(2017). 演化视角下的人类愤怒:愤怒标定理论. 心理技术与应用, 5(10), 596-604.
[16]  孙炳海, 楼宝娜, 李伟健, 刘宣文, 方侠辉(2011). 关注助人者的心理健康: 共情疲劳的涵义、结构及其发生机制. 心理科学进展, (10), 1518-1526.
[17]  王璐, 宋娟, 魏艳秋, 解鸿宇, 彭瑶, 张静达(2019). 初中生家庭环境与攻击性的关系: 共情的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 17(2), 216-222.
[18]  肖玉琴, 张卓, 宋平, 杨波(2014). 冷酷无情特质: 一种易于暴力犯罪的人格倾向. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1456-1466.
[19]  杨晓莉, 邹妍(2020). 我们真的能感同身受吗?——替代性排斥对个体的影响及理论解释. 心理科学进展, 28(9), 1575-1585.
[20]  张万里, 贾世伟, 陈光辉, 张文新(2014). 反应性-主动性攻击问卷在大学生中的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(2), 260-263.
[21]  周炎根, 刘贤敏, 赵李华, 张岩(2020). 大学生自尊和宽恕的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学探新, 40(2), 188-192.
[22]  左世江, 王芳, 石霞飞, 张啸(2014). 简单情绪感染及其研究困境. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 791-801.
[23]  Behm, D. G., & Carter, T. B. (2021). Empathetic Factors and Influences on Physical Performance: A Topical Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 686262.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686262
[24]  Cameron, C. D., Hutcherson, C. A., Ferguson, A. M., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Empathy Is Hard Work: People Choose to Avoid Empathy Because of Its Cognitive Costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 962-976.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000595
[25]  Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The Development of a Measure of Pro-social Behaviors for Late Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
[26]  Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger Is an Ap-proach-Related Affect: Evidence and Implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183-204.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965
[27]  Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2009). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (New York, N.Y.), 15, 593-600.
https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2008.0495
[28]  de Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evo-lution of Empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279-300.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625
[29]  Engert, V., Plessow, F., Miller, R., Kirschbaum, C., & Singer, T. (2014). Cortisol Increase in Empathic Stress Is Modulated by Emotional Closeness and Observation Modality. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 45, 192-201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.04.005
[30]  Fowler, Z., Law, K. F., & Gaesser, B. (2021). Against Empathy Bias: The Moral Value of Equitable Empathy. Psychological Science, 32, 766-779.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620979965
[31]  Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010). Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members' Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping. Neuron, 68, 149-160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003
[32]  Knight, L. K., Stoica, T., Fogleman, N. D., & Depue, B. E. (2019). Convergent Neural Correlates of Empathy and Anxiety during Socioemotional Processing. Frontiers in Human Neurosci-ence, 13, Article No. 94.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00094
[33]  Reimert, I., Bolhuis, J. E., Kemp, B., & Rodenburg, T. B. (2013). In-dicators of Positive and Negative Emotions and Emotional Contagion in Pigs. Physiology & Behavior, 109, 42-50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.002
[34]  Vachon, D. D., Lynam, D. R., & Johnson, J. A. (2014). The (Non)relation between Empathy and Aggression: Surprising Results from a Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 751-773.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035236
[35]  Wu, L., Kirmse, U., Flaisch, T., Boiandina, G., Kenter, A., & Schupp, H. T. (2017). Empathy, Pain and Attention: Cues That Predict Pain Stimulation to the Partner and the Self Capture Visual Attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article No. 465.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00465

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133