“狱侦耳目”伪证行为的入罪研究
A Study on the Incrimination of Perjury by “Prison Investigation Eyes and Ears”

因刑事案情侦查需要，侦查机关选用“狱侦耳目”辅助侦查。鉴于“狱侦耳目”隐蔽性等独特优势，“狱侦耳目”为侦查工作提供了及时、准确犯罪活动信息，利于损耗低、高效地完成刑事案件侦查工作。“狱侦耳目”制度无疑具有正当性、优越性。兹因关联法律规定阙如、监督制约机制缺乏、减刑待遇诱使等，“狱侦耳目”存有作伪证的现实危险性。透视“张氏叔侄案”，“狱侦耳目”袁连芳伪证行为令他人无端受诉受刑，却不为刑法处罚，甚至获得减刑待遇。有鉴于此，立足刑法实定法规定，“狱侦耳目”伪证行为宜为刑法处罚。
Because of the need of criminal investigation, investigation organs choose “prison investigation eyes and ears” to assist investigation. In view of the unique advantages of “prison investigation eyes and ears” such as concealment, “prison investigation eyes and ears” provide timely and accurate criminal activity information for investigation work, which is conducive to the completion of criminal case investigation work with low loss and high efficiency. There is no doubt that the system of “prison investigation eyes and ears” has legitimacy and superiority. Because of the absence of relevant legal provisions, the lack of supervision and restriction mechanism, and the inducement of commutation treatment, the “prison investigators and eyes” have the realistic risk of perjury. Through the “Zhang’s uncle and nephew case”, Yuan Lianfang’s perjury behavior caused others to be prosecuted and punished for no reason, but was not punished for criminal law, and even received commutation. In view of this, based on the provisions of the actual law of criminal law, the perjury behavior of “prison investigation eyes and ears” should be punished by criminal law.