全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

数字空间联结对视觉空间注意的影响——基于数量还是顺序?
The Influence of Spatial-Numerical Associations to Visual-Spatial Attention—Based on Magnitude or Sequential Representation?

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.139467, PP. 3743-3749

Keywords: 数量表征,顺序表征,视觉空间注意,Attentional SNARC
Magnituderep Resentation
, Sequence Representation, Visual-Spatialattention, Attentional SNARC

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

以往研究发现对数字的知觉能够影响空间注意的定向,给被试呈现小/大数字线索会自动诱发朝向左/右侧视野的注意转移,并促进对该侧视野目标的探测反应。他将该现象命名为注意的数字空间联结反应编码效应(Attentional SNAR Effect)。但数字既存在数量表征,也存在顺序表征,数字空间联结对空间注意的影响是基于数字的数量表征还是顺序表征目前还存在争议。本文系统梳理了三个方面的实证研究及相关的理论解释,即支持数字的数量表征影响空间注意、支持数字的顺序表征影响空间注意以及支持两种共同影响空间注意,并对未来研究提出展望。
Previous researches found that the perception of numbers can influence the orientation of spatial attention. Presenting participants with small/large number cues automatically induces attentional shifts toward the left/right visual field and facilitates detection responses towards targets in that visual field. This phenomenon is named the Attentional Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes Effect (Attentional SNARC Effect). However, there is currently a debate regarding whether the influence of numbers on spatial attention is due to magnitude representation or sequential repre-sentation. This study systematically reviews three aspects of empirical research and relevant theo-retical explanations: the influence of the magnitude representation on spatial attention, the influ-ence of the sequential representation on spatial attention and influence of both on spatial attention. Finally, prospects for future research are proposed.

References

[1]  Abrahamse, E., van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2016). How Does Working Memory Enable Number-Induced Spatial Biases? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 977.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00977
[2]  Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2007). Temporal Order Judgment Reveals How Number Magnitude Affects Visuospatial Attention. Cognition, 102, 101-117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.001
[3]  Casasanto, D., & Pitt, B. (2019). The Faulty Magnitude Detector: Why SNARC-Like Tasks Cannot Support a GeneralizedMagnitude System. Cognitive Science, 43, e12794.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12794
[4]  Cutini, S., Scarpa, F., Scatturin, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Number-Space Interactions in the Human Parietal Cortex: Enlightening the SNARC Effect with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 444-451.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs321
[5]  Dehaene, S. (2003). The Neural Basis of the Weber-Fechner Law: A Loga-rithmic Mental Number Line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00055-X
[6]  Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
[7]  Dodd, M. D., Van der Stigchel, S., Adil Leghari, M., Fung, G., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Attentional SNARC: There’s Something Special about Numbers (Let Us Count the Ways). Cognition, 108, 810-818.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.006
[8]  Eimer, M. (2000). An ERP Study of Sustained Spatial Attention to Stimulus Eccentricity. Biological Psychology, 52, 205-220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00028-4
[9]  Fias, W., & van Dijck, J.-P. (2016). The Temporary Nature of Number—Space Interactions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expéri-mentale, 70, 33-40.
https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000071
[10]  Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1461-1483.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.927515
[11]  Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving Numbers Causes Spatial Shifts of Attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555-556.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1066
[12]  Fumarola, A., Prpic, V., Da Pos, O., Murgia, M., Umiltà, C., & Agostini, T. (2014). Automatic Spatial Association for Luminance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 759-765.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0614-y
[13]  Galarraga, D. B., Pratt, J., & Cochrane, B. A. (2022). Is the Atten-tional SNARC Effect Truly Attentional? Using Temporal Order Judgements to Differentiate Attention from Response. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 808-817.
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479
[14]  Galfano, G., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Number Magnitude Orients Attention, but Not against One’s Will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 869-874.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194011
[15]  Gevers, W., Lammertyn, J., Notebaert, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006a). Automatic Response Activation of Implicit Spatial Information: Evidence from the SNARC Effect. Acta Psychologica, 122, 221-233.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.11.004
[16]  Gevers, W., Ratinckx, E., De Baene, W., & Fias, W. (2006b). Fur-ther Evidence That the SNARC Effect Is Processed along a Dual-Route Architecture. Experimental Psychology, 53, 58-68.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.58
[17]  Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interac-tions between Number and Space in Parietal Cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1684
[18]  Koch, N. N., Huber, J. F., Lohmann, J., Cipora, K., Butz, M. V., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2023). Mental Number Representations Are Spatially Mapped Both by Their Magnitudes and Ordinal Positions. Collabra: Psychology, 9, Article 67908.
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.67908
[19]  Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Pratt, J., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Short Article: Coding Strategies in Number Space: Memory Requirements Influence Spatial-Numerical Associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 515-524.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701728677
[20]  Moro, S. B., Dell’Acqua, R., & Cutini, S. (2018). The SNARC Effect Is Not a Unitary Phenomenon. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 688-695.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1408-3
[21]  Natale, E., Marzi, C. A., Girelli, M., Pavone, E. F., & Poll-mann, S. (2006). ERP and fMRI Correlates of Endogenous and Exogenous Focusing of Visual-Spatial Attention. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 2511-2521.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04756.x
[22]  Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G., & Willmes, K. (2005). The Universal SNARC Effect: The Association between Number Magnitude and Space Is Amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187-194.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.187
[23]  Piazza, M., Giacomini, E., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2003). Sin-gle-Trial Classification of Parallel Pre-Attentive and Serial Attentive Processes Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imag-ing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1237-1245.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2356
[24]  Prpic, V., Fumarola, A., De Tommaso, M., Luccio, R., Murgia, M., & Agostini, T. (2016). Separate Mechanisms for Magnitude and Order Processing in the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) Effect: The Strange Case of Musical Note Values. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1241-1251.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000217
[25]  Prpic, V., Mingolo, S., Agostini, T., & Murgia, M. (2021). Magnitude and Order Are Both Relevant in SNARC and SNARC-Like Effects: A Commentary on Casasanto and Pitt (2019). Cognitive Science, 45, e13006.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13006
[26]  Rasoulzadeh, V., Sahan, M. I., van Dijck, J.-P., Abrahamse, E., Marzecova, A., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2021). Spatial Attention in Serial Order Working Memory: An EEG Study. Cerebral Cortex, 31, 2482-2493.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa368
[27]  Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The Number Line Effect Reflects Top-Down Control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 862-868.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194010
[28]  Sahan, M. I., van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2022). Eye-Movements Reveal the Serial Position of the Attended Item in Verbal Working Memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 530-540.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02005-9
[29]  Schuller, A.-M., Hoffmann, D., Goffaux, V., & Schiltz, C. (2015). Shifts of Spatial Attention Cued by Irrelevant Numbers: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Target Discrimination Task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 442-458.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.946419
[30]  Sellaro, R., Treccani, B., Job, R. et al.(2014). Spatial Coding of Object Typical Size: Evidence for a SNARC-Like Effect. Psychological Research, 79, 950-962.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0636-7
[31]  Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed Attention and Perception of Temporal Order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539-550.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.539
[32]  van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2011). A Working Memory Account for Spatial-Numerical Associations. Cognition, 119, 114-119.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013
[33]  van Dijck, J.-P., Abrahamse, E. L., Acar, F., Ketels, B., & Fias, W. (2014). A Working Memory Account of the Interaction be-tween Numbers and Spatial Attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1500-1513.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.903984
[34]  Wijers, A. A., Lange, J. J., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1997). An ERP Study of Visual Spatial Attention and Letter Target Detection for Isoluminant and Nonisoluminant Stimuli. Psychophysiology, 34, 553-565.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb01742.x

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133