|
论违法所得没收程序中债权人的权利保障
|
Abstract:
在刑民交叉案件中,倡导“先刑后民”原则,对于民事权利的保护并不十分重视,尤其是利害关系人的财产权。涉案财产处置制度之一的违法所得没收程序,虽是保障受害人和国家利益的主要措施之一,但对与涉案财产有关的利害关系人权利的保障却尚付阙如。可作为利害关系人之一的债权人在违法所得没收程序的权利保障亦存在完善的空间,其权益也应得到切实保障。通过有关背景介绍、现存问题进行分析,进一步完善债权人在违法所得没收程序中的权益保障,补苴罅漏,切实保障债权人的合法权益。
In criminal civil cross disciplinary cases, the principle of “punishment before the people” is advocated, but the protection of civil rights is not highly valued, especially the property rights of stakeholders. The confiscation procedure of illegal gains, one of the property disposal systems involved in the case, is one of the main measures to protect the interests of victims and the country, but there is still a lack of protection for the rights of stakeholders related to the property involved. There is also room for improvement in the protection of the rights of creditors who can be one of the stakeholders in the process of confiscation of illegal gains, and their rights and interests are effectively protected. Through the introduction of relevant background and analysis of existing problems, we will further improve the protection of creditors’ rights and interests in the procedure of confiscation of illegal income, fill in the gaps and effectively protect creditors’ legitimate rights and interests.
[1] | 陈纯柱, 樊锐. “先民后刑”模式的正当性与量刑研究[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2012, 28(2): 59-67+160. |
[2] | 纪格非. 刑事涉案财物处置程序中的案外人权利保护[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(8): 1-11. |
[3] | 孙明泽, 郭小芳. 论违法所得没收程序中利害关系人的权利保障[J]. 福建警察学院学报, 2022, 36(5): 91-100. |
[4] | 应秀良. 论我国赃物善意取得的法律适用——兼论物权法第一百零六条、第一百零七条的理解[J]. 人民司法, 2008(15): 18-22. |
[5] | 王约然. 民刑交叉视域下涉案财物处置程序研究——以被害人及利害关系人的财产保障为中心[J]. 甘肃政法大学学报, 2022(5): 16-27. |
[6] | 蒋晓亮. 论我国刑事涉案财物执行中的案外人救济[J]. 法律适用, 2016(8): 82-87. |
[7] | 广东省东莞市第一人民法院课题组. 赃款赃物处理的法律实务问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2010(5): 67-72. |
[8] | 陈卫东, 李响. 论违法所得没收特别程序中的利害关系人[J]. 政法论坛, 2015, 33(1): 73-82. |
[9] | 徐鹏鹏. 论“刑民交叉”案件中债权人的权益保障[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2020: 10-37. |
[10] | 涉及经济犯罪的民事案件疑难法律问题研究[J]. 人民司法, 2005(5): 39-43. |