|
反垄断法安全港规则的适用范围研究
|
Abstract:
反垄断法修改后,在纵向垄断协议中规定了安全港规则,完善了纵向垄断协议的分析框架,丰富了经营者抗辩路径,然而将适用范围限缩为纵向垄断协议与既往规定相异,具体适用于哪一类型的纵向垄断协议也存在模糊之处。安全港规则在我国实践中已积累了多年经验,厘清安全港规则的适用范围应从梳理立法实践入手,剖析法律条文本身,结合垄断协议的竞争效果进行分析,将安全港规则的适用范围明确为除核心限制以外的其他横向或者纵向垄断协议,同时应及时修改下位法的相关内容,以维护我国反垄断法律体系的统一性。
After the amendment of the anti-monopoly Law, the safe harbor rule is stipulated in the vertical monopoly agreement, the analysis framework of the vertical monopoly agreement is improved, and the defense path of operators is enriched. However, limiting the scope of application to vertical monopoly agreement is different from the previous provisions, and there are some ambiguations about which type of vertical monopoly agreement is applicable. The safe harbor rule has accumulated many years of experience in China’s practice. Clarifying the scope of application of the safe harbor rule should start from combing legislative practice, analyzing the legal provisions themselves, and analyzing the competition effect of monopoly agreements. The scope of application of the safe harbor rule should be defined as other horizontal or vertical monopoly agreements except the core restrictions to maintain the unity of our country’s anti-monopoly legal system.
[1] | 李国海, 王伊宁. 我国反垄断法安全港规则的构建[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 43(2): 60-71. |
[2] | 赫伯特?霍温坎普. 联邦反托拉斯政策: 竞争法律及其实践[M]. 第3版. 许光耀, 江山, 王晨, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009: 86-87. |
[3] | 万江. 中国反垄断法: 理论、实践与比较[M]. 第3版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 80. |
[4] | 时建中, 郝俊淇. 原则性禁止转售价格维持的立法正确性及其实施改进[J]. 政治与律, 2017(11): 20-33. |
[5] | 焦海涛. 纵向非价格垄断协议的反垄断法规制: 困境与出路[J]. 现代法学, 2019, 41(4): 123-139. |
[6] | 徐则林. 垄断协议安全港规则的中国应用: 从立法到实施[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 76(3): 174-184. |
[7] | 王慧群. 中国垄断协议安全港规则的立法逻辑: 信息成本的视角[J]. 法学家, 2023(1): 57-73+193. |
[8] | 刘继峰. 我国反垄断法纵向垄断协议安全港制度的完善[J]. 中州学刊, 2023(2): 64-72. |
[9] | 时建中. 新《反垄断法》的现实意义与内容解读[J]. 中国法律评论, 2022(4): 182-194. |