|
电信诈骗帮助取款行为的诈骗共犯归责路径
|
Abstract:
电信网络诈骗案件中的帮助取款行为可能涉及帮信罪、掩饰隐瞒犯罪所得罪,也可能构成诈骗罪的共犯,对该种行为的刑法定性不能一概而论,应该将帮助取款行为的情况进行类型化区分,结合行为人的主客观要素综合认定。首先,应明确诈骗既遂的标准,进而判断取款人介入犯罪的时间是否符合共犯的成立条件;此外,还需根据取款人明知的内容判断其是否具有希望或放任诈骗既遂结果发生的故意。以此为基础通过片面共犯的理论引入进一步释明帮助取款行为构成诈骗共犯的归责标准。
In telecommunication network fraud cases, the behavior of helping to withdraw money may involve the crime of helping to believe, covering up and concealing the crime, or it may constitute an accomplice of fraud. The criminal law nature of this behavior cannot be generalized, so we should classify the behavior of helping to withdraw money and comprehensively identify it with the subjective and objective factors of the actor. First of all, we should make clear the standard of accomplished fraud, and then judge whether the time when the cashier intervened in the crime meets the conditions for the establishment of an accomplice; In addition, it is necessary to judge whether the drawee has hope or deliberately let the accomplished result of fraud happen according to what he knows. On this basis, through the introduction of the theory of one-sided accomplice, it is further explained that helping to withdraw money constitutes the imputation standard of fraud accomplice.
[1] | 欧阳本祺, 刘梦. 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的适用方法: 从本罪优先到共犯优先[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(1): 107-121. |
[2] | 叶良芳, 袁玉杰. 帮助取款行为的诈骗共犯归责误区及其匡正[J]. 政法学刊, 2023, 40(1): 14-25. |
[3] | 张建, 俞小海. 电信诈骗犯罪中帮助取款人的刑事责任分析[J]. 法学, 2016(6): 145-151. |
[4] | 李会彬. 电信诈骗帮助取款行为的共犯认定[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2017, 25(1): 105-113+174-175. |
[5] | 焦艳鹏, 杨红梅. 网络诈骗犯罪刑事司法样态实证研究——以389份生效刑事判决书为分析对象[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2017(4): 91-102. |
[6] | 张明楷. 犯罪故意中的“明知” [J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2023, 38(1): 38-54. |
[7] | 李强. 片面共犯肯定论的语义解释根据[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2016, 34(2): 52-58. |