|
|
同伴对青少年跨期决策的影响及其神经机制
|
Abstract:
跨期决策对青少年的发展具有重要意义，同伴社会背景和同伴社会信息会影响青少年的跨期决策。通过梳理同伴对青少年的跨期决策影响模式，并分析其认知神经机制，可以更好地干预负面同伴影响、发挥同伴优势。未来应进一步探究这种社会影响的本质，重视实验的生态效度，并构建更完善的神经心理机制模型。
Intertemporal choice is of great significance to the development of adolescents. Peer contexts and social information from peers can affect adolescent intertemporal decision making. By sorting out the patterns of peer influence on adolescents’ intertemporal choice and analyzing its cognitive neural mechanism, we can better intervene in negative peer influence and exert peer advantage. In the future, we should further explore the nature of this social influence, pay attention to the ecological validity of the experiment, and build a more complete neuropsychological mechanism model.
| [1] | Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013). The Teenage Brain: Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412471347 |
| [2] | Apps, M. A. J. & Ramnani, N. (2017). Contributions of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex to Social Influence in Economic Decision-Making. Cerebral Cortex, 27, 4635-4648. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx183 |
| [3] | Belletier, C., Normand, A., & Huguet, P. (2019). Social-Facilitation-and-Impairment Effects: From Motivation to Cognition and the Social Brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 260-265.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419829699 |
| [4] | Bixter, M. T., & Luhmann, C. C. (2020). Delay Discounting in Dyads and Small Groups: Group Leadership, Status Information, and Actor-Partner Interdependence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 86, Article 103902.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103902 |
| [5] | Bixter, M. T., & Rogers, W. A. (2019). Age-Related Differences in Delay Discounting: Immediate Reward, Reward Magnitude, and Social Influence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32, 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2124 |
| [6] | Bixter, M. T., Trimber, E. M., & Luhmann, C. C. (2017). Are Intertemporal Preferences Contagious? Evidence from Collaborative Decision Making. Memory and Cognition, 45, 837-851. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z |
| [7] | Breiner, K., Li, A., Cohen, A. O., Steinberg, L., Bonnie, R. J., Scott, E. S. et al. (2018). Combined Effects of Peer Presence, Social Cues, and Rewards on Cognitive Control in Adolescents. Developmental Psychobiology, 60, 292-302.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21599 |
| [8] | Calluso, C., Tosoni, A., Fortunato, G., & Committeri, G. (2017). Can You Change My Preferences? Effect of Social Influence on Intertemporal Choice Behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 330, 78-84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.001v |
| [9] | Charlton, S. R., Yi, R., Porter, C., Carter, A. E., Bickel, W., & Rachlin, H. (2013). Now for Me, Later for Us? Effects of Group Context on Temporal Discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 118-127.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.766 |
| [10] | Edgington, E. (2021). Better Together? Effects of Dyadic Collaboration on Intertemporal Preference. Master’s Thesis, James Madison University. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/masters202029/99 |
| [11] | Fields, R. D. (2015). A New Mechanism of Nervous System Plasticity: Activity-Dependent Myelination. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 756-767. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn4023 |
| [12] | Garvert, M. M., Moutoussis, M., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Behrens, T. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2015). Learning-Induced Plasticity in Medial Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Preference Malleability. Neuron, 85, 418-428.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.033 |
| [13] | Gilman, J. M., Curran, M. T., Calderon, V., Stoeckel, L. E., & Evins, A. E. (2014). Impulsive Social Influence Increases Impulsive Choices on a Temporal Discounting Task in Young Adults. PLOS ONE, 9, e101570.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101570 |
| [14] | Goh, F. W., & Stevens, J. R. (2022). Social Influences on Similarity Judgments and Intertemporal Choice. PsyArXiv.
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xz68b |
| [15] | Hofmans, L., & van den Bos, W. (2022). Social Learning across Adolescence: A Bayesian Neurocognitive Perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 58, Article 101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101151 |
| [16] | Levorsen, M., Ito, A., Suzuki, S., & Izuma, K. (2021). Testing the Reinforcement Learning Hypothesis of Social Conformity. Human Brain Mapping, 42, 1328-1342. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25296 |
| [17] | Loya, J. M., Roth, M. R., & Yi, R. (2018). An Examination of Group Size and Valence in Delay Discounting of Shared Outcomes. Behavioural Processes, 157, 673-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.001 |
| [18] | O’Brien, L., Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Adolescents Prefer More Immediate Rewards When in the Presence of their Peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 747-753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00738.x |
| [19] | Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2011). The Neural Mechanisms of Inter-Temporal Decision-Making: Understanding Variability. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002 |
| [20] | Piva, M., Velnoskey, K., Jia, R., Nair, A., Levy, I., & Chang, S. W. (2019). The Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex Computes Task-Invariant Relative Subjective Value for Self and Other. eLife, 8, e44939. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44939.033 |
| [21] | Reiter, A. M., Moutoussis, M., Vanes, L., Kievit, R., Bullmore, E. T., Goodyer, I. M. et al. (2021). Preference Uncertainty Accounts for Developmental Effects on Susceptibility to Peer Influence in Adolescence. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 3823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23671-2 |
| [22] | Roth, M. R., Loya, J. M., & Yi, R. (2022). The Role of Social Value Orientation on Delay Discounting in a Group Context. Personality and Individual Differences, 187, Article 111401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111401 |
| [23] | Schwenke, D., Wehner, P., & Scherbaum, S. (2022). Effects of Individual and Dyadic Decision-Making and Normative Reference on Delay Discounting Decisions. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7, Article No. 71.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5 |
| [24] | Senecal, N., Wang, T., Thompson, E., & Kable, J. W. (2012). Normative Arguments from Experts and Peers Reduce Delay Discounting. Judgment & Decision Making, 7, 568-589. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006306 |
| [25] | Silva, K., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). Adolescents in Peer Groups Make More Prudent Decisions When a Slightly Older Adult Is Present. Psychological science, 27, 322-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615620379 |
| [26] | Somerville, L. H., Haddara, N., Sasse, S. F., Skwara, A. C., Moran, J. M., & Figner, B. (2019). Dissecting “Peer Presence” and “Decisions” to Deepen Understanding of Peer Influence on Adolescent Risky Choice. Child Development, 90, 2086-2103. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13081 |
| [27] | Tang, S., Guo, J., Li, B., & Song, Z. (2021). The Effect of Social Distance on Intertemporal Choice of Reward Processing: An Event-Related Potentials Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, Article 712194.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.712194 |
| [28] | Thomas, L. (2021). Knowing You, Changing Me: Individual Differences in Social Learning and Influence in Discounting Tasks. Doctorial Dissertation, University of London. https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/ws/files/43719754/2021thomasljphd |
| [29] | Tsuruta, M., & Inukai, K. (2018). How Are Individual Time Preferences Aggregated in Groups? A Laboratory Experiment on Intertemporal Group Decision-Making. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4, Article 43.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00043 |
| [30] | Tymula, A. (2019). An Experimental Study of Adolescent Behavior under Peer Observation: Adolescents Are More Impatient and Inconsistent, Not More Risk-Taking, When Observed by Peers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 166, 735-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.014 |
| [31] | van de Groep, S., Sweijen, S. W., de Water, E., & Crone, E. A. (2023). Temporal Discounting for Self and Friends in Adolescence: A fMRI Study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 60, Article 101204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101204 |
| [32] | van Hoorn, J., Fuligni, A. J., Crone, E. A., & Galvan, A. (2016). Peer Influence Effects on Risk-Taking and Prosocial Decision-Making in Adolescence: Insights from Neuroimaging Studies. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 59-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.007 |
| [33] | Weigard, A., Chein, J., Albert, D., Smith, A., & Steinberg, L. (2013). Effects of Anonymous Peer Observation on Adolescents’ Preference for Immediate Rewards. Developmental Science, 17, 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12099 |
| [34] | Yi, R., Lee, J., & Bettis, J. (2020). Asymmetry of the Group Context Effect on Delay Discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2149 |
| [35] | Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Zhu, Q., Yan, J., Zhang, T., Zhang, J. et al. (2023). The Brain Stimulation of DLPFC Regulates Choice Preference in Intertemporal Choice Self-Other Differences. Behavioural Brain Research, 440, Article 114265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114265 |
