全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

高中生未来时间洞察力对学习投入的影响:个人成长主动性的中介作用
The Effect of High School Students’ Future Time Insight on Learning Engagement: The Mediating Role of Personal Growth Initiative

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.139460, PP. 3687-3696

Keywords: 高中生,未来时间透视,学习投入,个人成长主动性
High School Students
, Future Time Perspective, Academic Engagement, Personal Growth Initiative

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:研究高中生未来时间洞察力对其学习投入的影响,验证个人成长主动性在二者之间的中介作用。方法:通过对某一高中学校474名高中生进行问卷调查,其中使用未来时间洞察力问卷、学习投入量表和个人成长主动性量表。结果:1) 高中生未来时间洞察力得分在3.14 ± 0.24,学习投入得分在4.54 ± 0.97,个人成长主动性得分在4 ± 0.71;2) 高中生未来时间洞察力与学习投入呈显著正相关(r = 0.171, P < 0.01),未来时间洞察力与个人成长主动性呈正相关(r = 0.140, P < 0.01),个人成长主动性与学习投入显著相关(r = 0.520, P < 0.01);3) 个人成长主动性在未来时间洞察力和学习投入之间起部分中介作用,中介效应占比为41.57%。结论:高中生未来时间洞察力对学习投入可以正向预测;个人成长主动性在两者中起部分中介作用。
Purpose: To study the influence of high school students’ future time insight on their learning engagement and to verify the mediating role of personal growth initiative between the two. Methods: Through a questionnaire survey of 474 high school students in a high school, in which the Future Time Insight Questionnaire, Learning Input Scale and Personal Growth Initiative Scale were used. Results: 1) High school students’ future time insight scores were at 3.14 ± 0.24, learning engagement scores were at 4.54 ± 0.97, and personal growth initiative scores were at 4 ± 0.71; 2) High school students’ future time insight was significantly and positively correlated with learning engagement (r = 0.171, P < 0.01), and future time insight was positively correlated with personal growth initiative (r = 0.140, P < 0.01), and future time insight was positively correlated with personal growth initiative (r = 0.171, P < 0.01). 0.140, P < 0.01), personal growth initiative is significantly correlated with study input (r = 0.520, P < 0.01); 3) Personal growth initiative partially mediates the relationship between future time insight and study input, with a mediating effect of 41.57%. Conclusion: high school students’ future time insight can positively predict learning engagement; personal growth initiative plays a partial mediating role in both.

References

[1]  基金项目名称:基于云计算的中医心理健康服务网络系统的研究与实现,课题编号:GJJ2200929。
[2]  敖玲敏, 吕厚超, 黄希庭(2011). 社会情绪选择理论概述. 心理科学进展, 19(2), 217-223.
[3]  蔡林, 贾绪计(2020). 学业自我效能感与在线学习投入的关系: 学习动机和心流体验的链式中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 18(6), 805-811.
[4]  陈继文, 郭永玉, 胡小勇(2015). 教师自主支持与初中生的学习投入: 家庭社会阶层与学生自主动机的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(2), 180-187.
https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.02.07
[5]  陈燕禧(2020). 青少年性别角色类型对未来时间洞察力的影响: 个人成长主动性的中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 福州: 福建师范大学. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202201&filename=1021720094.nh
[6]  方来坛, 时勘, 张风华(2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620.
[7]  郭文斌, 苏蒙(2021). 网络学习空间教师支持对大学生学习投入的影响研究——基于学业自我效能感的中介作用. 教育理论与实践, 41(30), 50-54.
[8]  韩嘉蕾(2022). 家庭功能对中学生学习投入的影响: 社会支持和个人成长主动性的链式中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 聊城: 聊城大学.
[9]  黄希庭(2004). 论时间洞察力. 心理科学, 27(1), 5-7.
https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2004.01.002
[10]  贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德(2020). 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系: 学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(6), 700-707.
https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.06.08
[11]  吕厚超(2014). 青少年时间洞察力研究(pp. 142-145). 科学出版社.
[12]  牛羊(2016). 高中生学业压力、希望特质与学习投入的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西大学. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201701&filename=1017002188.nh
[13]  裴彩言(2022). 高中生未来时间洞察力与学习投入的关系. 硕士学位论文, 保定: 河北大学. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202301&filename=1023429084.nh
[14]  孙灯勇, 王倩, 王梅, 满丛英(2014). 个人成长主动性的概念、测量及影响. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1413-1422.
[15]  孙颖, 成洁, 陈文革(2020). 未来时间洞察力对学习投入的影响: 链式中介效应分析. 人类工效学, 26(6), 71-76.
https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2020.06.0014
[16]  田玉洁(2016). 大学生个人成长主动性的结构及其相关研究. 开封: 河南大学.
[17]  万美玲, 章敏之, 陈燕娥, 庄海燕, 郑荣芳(2012). 实习期间师生沟通状况、一般自我效能感及其关系研究. 护理研究, 26(5), 405-406.
[18]  王晓娜(2021). 疫情期间高中生家庭功能与学习投入的关系——个人成长主动性的中介作用. 中小学心理健康教育, (12), 18-23.
[19]  王艳辉, 李董平, 孙文强, 赵力燕, 赖雪芬, 周月月(2017). 亲子依恋与初中生亲社会行为: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 49(5), 663-679.
[20]  向祖强, 马芳芳, 周淼, 吴杜娟, 董琳, 黄伊琳(2022). 学习动机对学习倦怠的影响: 学习投入的中介作用和个人成长主动性的调节作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 30(9), 1394-1400.
https://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2022.09.022
[21]  肖艳双, 徐大真(2011). 未来时间洞察力与学习投入的关系: 自我决定的中介效应研究. 见 中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨第十四届全国心理学学术会议论文集(pp. 602-603). 中国心理学会.
[22]  谢菲(2020). 大学生未来时间洞察力、时间管理自我监控与学习投入的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京邮电大学. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202101&filename=1020427885.nh
[23]  周鹏生, 魏芸梅, 杨奎(2014). 中学生教养方式、学习投入与学业成绩的关系研究. 教学与管理, (3), 88-90.
[24]  Carstensen, L. L. (1987). Handbook of Clinical Gerontology (pp. 222-237). Pergamon Press.
[25]  Chang, E. C., & Yang, H. (2016). Personal and Family Growth Initiative as Predictors of Study Engagement in Chinese and American College Students: Is There Any Evidence for Group Differences? Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 186-189.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.004
[26]  Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Vasalampi, K., Silinskas, G., Aunola, K., & Poikkeus, A. M. et al. (2014). Task-Focused Behavior Mediates the Associations between Supportive Interpersonal Environments and Students’ Academic Performance. Psychological Science, 25, 1018-1024.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613519111
[27]  Peetsma, T. (2000). Future Time Perspective as a Predictor of School Investment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 177-192.
[28]  Phan, H. P. (2011). Amalgamation of Future Time Orientation, Epistemological Beliefs, Achievement Goals and Study Strategies: Empirical Evidence Established. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 155-173.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X306864
[29]  Robitschek, C., Ashton, M. W., Spering, C. C., Geiger, N., Byers, D., Schotts, G. C., & Thoen, M. A. (2012). Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale-II. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 274-287.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027310
[30]  Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
[31]  Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effect of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
[32]  Walburg, V. (2014). Burnout among High School Students: A Literature Review. Children and Youth Services Review, 42, 28-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.020
[33]  Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Student. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133