全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

国际商事仲裁复裁机制的构建
Establishment of Appellate Arbitration Procedure in International Commercial Arbitration

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2023.95325, PP. 2391-2396

Keywords: 国际商事仲裁,一裁终局,实体错误,复裁机制
International Commercial Arbitration
, Final and Binding, Substantive Errors, Appellate Arbitration Procedure

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

国际商事仲裁作为国际商事纠纷的解决机制,一直坚持“一裁终局”原则,因其高效解决纠纷的优势而受到国际商事当事人大量适用。“一裁终局”原则因仲裁裁决具有终局性从而能相对快速的解决彼此之间的纠纷,但在现存的裁决审查程序制度下,其“一裁终局”的模式也使得当事人无进一步就裁决中的实体错误进行纠正的可能。因此,为了更好地适应现今的国际商事环境,本文欲探讨在保障仲裁高效解决纠纷的优势的前提下,通过仲裁制度的设计,在国际商事仲裁中建立复裁机制,进一步提高国际商事仲裁裁决的公正性。
International commercial arbitration has always been a dispute resolution mechanism based on the principle of “final and binding” to efficiently resolve disputes, which has been widely used by international commercial parties. The “final and binding” principle can relatively quickly resolve disputes between parties because the arbitral award is final. However, under the existing system of arbitral award review procedures, the “final and binding” principle also means that parties have no further possibility to correct substantive errors in the award. Therefore, in order to better adapt to today’s international commercial environment, this article intends to discuss the establishment of a review mechanism in international commercial arbitration through the design of the arbitration system on the premise of ensuring the advantages of efficient dispute resolution by arbitration, so as to further improve the impartiality of international commercial arbitration awards.

References

[1]  韩德培. 国际私法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002: 484.
[2]  刘伟全. 从仲裁、诉讼之比较看仲裁在国际经贸、海事争议解决中的优越性[J]. 商业研究, 2001(2): 170-171.
[3]  张春良. 论国际商事仲裁价值[J]. 河北法学, 2006(6): 103-108.
[4]  加里?B?博恩. 国际仲裁: 法律与实践[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015: 55-66.
[5]  石现明. 效率与公正之平衡: 国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制[J]. 仲裁研究, 2007(2): 12-18.
[6]  宋肇屹. 告别“一裁终局”?——中国大陆商事仲裁实体上诉机制研究[J]. 北京仲裁, 2017(4): 105-131.
[7]  聂咏青. 非内国仲裁理论评论[J]. 法律适用, 2005(9): 22-25.
[8]  郭玉军, 陈芝兰. 论国际商事仲裁中的“非国内化”理论[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2003(1): 103-117.
[9]  张潇剑. 被撤销之国际商事仲裁裁决的承认与执行[J]. 中外法学, 2006(3): 361-374.
[10]  安涵. 关于建立国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制的思考[J]. 淮北职业技术学院学报, 2021, 20(3): 103-107.
[11]  徐树. 谁来监督裁判者: 国际仲裁越权裁决的救济难题[J]. 当代法学, 2022, 36(1): 149-160.
[12]  万鄂湘, 于喜富. 再论司法与仲裁的关系——关于法院应否监督仲裁实体内容的立法与实践模式及理论思考[J].法学评论, 2004(3): 60-69.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133