|
Design 2023
活力营造视角下乡村公共空间景观优化策略——以南京桦墅村为例
|
Abstract:
随着工业化、城镇化的快速发展,中国乡村地区“空心化”日益严重,传统的乡村公共空间活力缺失,社会关联情势和人际交往布局日渐衰败,一个充满活力的乡村公共空间是维系乡村居民情感的纽带。笔者依据层次分析法的应用原则,构建出乡村公共空间活力评价指标体系,进而运用德尔菲法由专家对评价体系各级指标的重要性进行分析,确定平均得分并且基于层次分析法建立判断矩阵,确定其指标权重。本文以南京桦墅村为例,运用五分制法结合指标权重及相关计算法则,得出桦墅村公共空间活力的综合得分以明确其活力评价等级,且进一步通过IPA分析方法探索桦墅村活力均衡发展的策略。最终得出影响桦墅村乡村公共空间整体活力最大的指标为生态活力,空间活力和设施活力次之,文化活力最差,依据各级活力指标得分,笔者从整体、自然、人文和人工四个景观空间方面提出活力提升策略,以期为乡村公共空间建设提供技术途径和方法指导。
With the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization in China, rural areas are facing increasing \"hollowing out\" issues, resulting in a lack of vitality in traditional rural public spaces. Social connections and interpersonal interactions in these areas have been declining. A vibrant rural public space serves as a bond to maintain the emotional connection among rural residents. Based on the principles of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the author constructs an evaluation index system for the vitality of rural public spaces. The Delphi method is then applied to analyze the importance of each level of indicators in the evaluation system, determine the average scores, and establish a judgment matrix using AHP to determine the indicator weights. Taking Huashu Village in Nanjing as a case study, the author employs a five-point scale method combined with indicator weights and relevant calculation rules to determine the comprehensive score of the vitality of Huashu Village's public spaces, thereby clarifying its vitality evaluation level. Furthermore, the author explores strategies for balanced development of vitality in Huashu Village through the application of the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method. The study concludes that ecological vitality has the greatest impact on the overall vitality of Huashu Village's rural public spaces, followed by spatial vitality and facility vitality, while cultural vitality lags behind. Based on the scores of each vitality indicator, the author proposes strategies for enhancing vitality from four aspects: overall, natural, cultural, and artificial landscapes, aiming to provide technical approaches and methodological guidance for the construction of rural public spaces.
[1] | 冯旭, 张湛新, 潘传杨, 等. 人口收缩背景下的乡村活力分析与实践——基于美国、德国、日本、英国的比较研究[J]. 国际城市规划, 2022, 37(3): 42-49+88. |
[2] | 张庆尧, 王雅梦. 数据视角下生活性街道空间形态与活力耦合性研究——以合肥老城区为例[C]//中国城市规划学会, 成都市人民政府. 面向高质量发展的空间治理——2020中国城市规划年会论文集(07城市设计). 2021: 224-236. |
[3] | 胡熙苑. 南京地区传统村落的空间形态研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 东南大学, 2021. |
[4] | 王丽洁, 聂蕊, 王舒扬. 基于地域性的乡村景观保护与发展策略研究[J]. 中国园林, 2016, 32(10): 65-67. |
[5] | 高小勇, 郭龙. 乡村公共空间的艺术性营造——以柳荫镇东升村为例[J]. 美术观察, 2022(3): 156-157. |
[6] | 孔燕. 苏南乡村公共空间活力评估研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 苏州: 苏州科技学院, 2014. |
[7] | 石永婷, 赵宇. 用艺术与乡土重塑乡村公共空间活力——以重庆市大足区和平村公共空间建设为例[J]. 美术大观, 2020(3): 128-130. |
[8] | 薛俊菲, 施宁菊, 马涛, 等. 江苏丘陵地区美丽乡村农业景观系统多维构建——以南京市桦墅村为例[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(17): 9-18. |
[9] | 程朝霞, 李光耀, 韩瑞婷. 基于AHP模型的运城盐湖湿地及周边景观综合评价[J]. 天津农业科学, 2019, 25(8): 69-72. |