|
Dispute Settlement 2023
论表见代理的本人可归责性
|
Abstract:
在我国现行法律制度下,表见代理制度主要规定在《民法典》第172条,以及《民法典总则编司法解释》第29条,从文义解释角度来看,“相对人有理由相信”是表见代理最基本的判定要件,然而实践中对于“本人可归责性”这一构成要件是否属于单一的构成要件却争议较多,学者存在独立构成要件和非独立构成要件说,本文旨在探究本人可归责性的实践应用,最终得出本人可归责性应当作为独立的构成要件来认定表见代理的观点。
Under China’s current legal system, the representation system is mainly stipulated in Article 172 of the Civil Code and Article 29 of the Judicial Interpretation of the General Provisions. “The counterparty has reason to believe” is the most basic judgment element of apparent agency, but in practice, there is much controversy as to whether the constituent element of “personal attribution” is a single constituent element, and scholars say that there are independent constituent elements and non-independent constituent elements. In the end, it is concluded that the attributability of the person should be determined as an independent constituent element to determine the apparent agent.
[1] | 纪海龙. 《合同法》第48条(无权代理规则)评注[J]. 法学家, 2017(4): 157-174. |
[2] | 王浩. “有理由相信行为人有代理权”之重构[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2020, 23(4): 178-192. |
[3] | 夏昊晗. 无权代理中相对人善意的判断标准[J]. 法学, 2018(6): 139-152. |
[4] | 张家勇. 论无权代理人赔偿责任的双层构造[J]. 中国法学, 2019(3): 123-143. |
[5] | 杨代雄. 表见代理的特别构成要件[J]. 法学, 2013(2): 58-70. |
[6] | 朱虎. 表见代理中的被代理人可归责性[J]. 法学研究, 2017, 39(2): 58-74. |
[7] | 王浩. 论代理的本质以代理权授予时的意思瑕疵问题为契机[J]. 中外法学, 2018, 30(3): 609-631. |