全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

国际投资法中国有企业的主体资格与中国因应
Qualification of State-Owned Enterprises under International Investment Law and China’s Response

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.115491, PP. 3437-3443

Keywords: 国有企业,投资者地位,Broches标准,ICSID仲裁
State-Owned Enterprises
, Investor Status, Broches Criteria, ICSID Arbitration

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着中国等发展中国家的崛起和全球经济治理的变革,国有企业及其行为在国际投资、贸易中的意义日益显现。国际投资法中各种投资协定和ICSID公约对投资者的规定方式各有特点,ICSID仲裁实践中逐渐形成了一套结合Broches标准,用以审查国有企业是否具备投资主体资格的审查方法。这些认定标准目前仍存在模糊之处,有待进一步完善。我国在国际投资中国有企业的投资主体资格认定标准存在不明确、不统一、不连贯的问题。因此,我国应积极利用并完善ICSID仲裁机制,更新BITs明确国有企业投资者身份,深化国有企业市场化改革。
With the rise of China and other developing countries and the change of global economic governance, the significance of state-owned enterprises and their behaviors in international investment and trade is increasingly apparent. Various investment agreements and ICSID conventions in international investment law have their own characteristics in terms of investor stipulations. In the practice of ICSID arbitration, a set of review methods combined with Broches criteria have been gradually formed to judge whether state-owned enterprises have the qualification of investment subjects. There are still some ambiguities in these standards and they need to be further improved. The qualification criteria of investment subject of Chinese enterprises in international investment are unclear, inconsistent and incoherent. Therefore, our country should take advantage of and perfect the ICSID arbitration mechanism, update BITs to clarify the investor identity of state-owned enterprises and deepen the market-oriented reform of state-owned enterprises.

References

[1]  沈铭辉. “竞争中立”视角下的TPP国有企业条款分析[J]. 国际经济合作, 2015(7): 20.
[2]  张金矜. 《中欧全面投资协定》国有企业规则述评[J]. 国际经济法学刊, 2022(4): 63-79.
[3]  刘彬, 魏薇. 中欧投资协定“涵盖实体”条款研究——兼析中国加入CPTPP的相关挑战[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2021(6): 116-134.
[4]  陈嘉, 杨翠柏. 国际投资仲裁中的国有企业投资者地位认定: 构造、趋势与因应[J]. 经济法论坛, 2018(6): 119-127.
[5]  伍穗龙. 国有企业在 ICSID管辖权中的仲裁资格[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022(5): 107-115.
[6]  李庆明. 论中国国有企业在美国民事诉讼中的国家豁免[J]. 江西社会科学, 2018(11): 168-256.
[7]  章成, 杨嘉琪. “一带一路”视角下的国有企业ICSID仲裁申请人资格研究[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(5): 76-89.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133