全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Prostatic Adenomectomy by High Approach versus Millin: Our Results on a Series of 15 Cases

DOI: 10.4236/oju.2023.138036, PP. 317-325

Keywords: Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, Adenomectomy, Millin Technique

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: In 2023, conventional surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is still used despite the introduction of minimally invasive techniques in the therapeutic arsenal. Objective: To present our results of Millin prostatic adenomectomy in a preliminary series of 15 cases. Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted at the Urology Department of the Bouaké University Hospital from January 2022 to January 2023. It involved 15 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who had undergone high adenomectomy using the Millin technique. Results: During the study period, 15 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated surgically by high adenomectomy using the Millin technique. The mean age of the patients was 63.6 years, ranging from 53 to 78 years. Nine (9) patients were consulted for progressive complications of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), i.e. 60% (n = 9). The mean IPSS score was 28 (20 to 35), and seven (7) patients had a comorbidity (46.44%). The digital rectal examination (DRE) was in favour of benign prostatic hypertrophy in all patients, and the mean weight of the prostate at DRE was 75 g, ranging from 55 g to 100 g. From a paraclinical point of view, prostatic ultrasound revealed a mean BPH weight of 82.7 g with extremes of 55 to 100 g. Post-micturition residue was greater than 150 ml in 60% (n = 9). The mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 3.8 ng/ml, ranging from 1.4 to 15 ng/ml. There was one case of severe anaemia with a haemoglobin level of 6 g/dl on haemogram, treated by blood transfusion. The cytobacteriological examination of the urine (ECBU) revealed five cases of E. coli infection, i.e. 33.33% (n = 5). Millin prostatic adenomectomy was performed under antibiotic prophylaxis at induction. All patients underwent locoregional anaesthesia. The mean weight of the adenoma was 80 g with extremes of 55 to 155 g. Blood loss was minimal at less than 100 ml, i.e. 86.6% (n = 13). The average operating time was 56.9 minutes, ranging from 45 to 75 minutes. The Retzius space was drained in an average of 2.75 days, with extremes of 2 to 4 days. The average duration of postoperative bladder catheterisation was 8.7 days, with extremes of 7 to 10 days. The average duration of bladder irrigation-washing was 3.6 days. The average hospital stay was 8.55 days, with extremes of 8 to 10 days. Morbidity was represented by Orchi-epididymitis (66%, n = 1) and mortality was 6.66% (n = 1). 6 months later, the 14 patients had good

References

[1]  Ferretli, M. and Phillips, J. (2015) Prostatectomy for Benign Prostate Disease: Open, Lapariscopic Robotic Techniques. Canadian Journal of Urology, 22, 60-66.
[2]  Kpatcha, T.M., Tchangai, B., Tengue, K., Alassani, F., Botcho, G., et al. (2016) Experience with Open Prostatectomy in Lomé, Togo. Open Journal of Urology, 6, 73-79.
https://doi.org/10.4236/oju.2016.65014
[3]  Briant, P.E., Navarro, R., Matillon, X., Coste, A., Adam, E., Champetier, D., et al. (2014) L’adénectomie selon MILLIN à l’heure de l’énucléation laser: Résultats d’une série de 240 cas. Progrès en Urologie, 24, 379-389.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2013.09.030
[4]  Choundale, O., Elharrech, Y., Anzooui, J., Abaka, N. and Touiti, D. (2014) Le drainage pelvien après adénomectomie prostatique transvésicale reste-il indispensable? African Journal of Urology, 20, 154-157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2014.04.002
[5]  Ondongo, A., Ondziel, O., Dimi, N., Danga, M., Okamba, S., Service, M., et al. (2020) Prise en charge de l’hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate au centre hospitalier et universitaire de Brazaville. Andrology Urology Journal, 2, 138-143.
[6]  Bagayogo, N., Sine, B., Faye, M., Sars, A., Thuim, A., Ndiaye, M., et al. (2021) Hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate (HBP) géante aspect épidémiologiques, cliniques et thérapeutiques. African Journal of Urology, 27, 49-55.
https://doi.org/10.21608/afju.2021.9359
[7]  Elzaya, E. and Elhilali, E. (2007) Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HOLEP): Long-Term Results, Reoperation Rate, and Possible Impact of the Learning Auve. European Urology, 52, 1465-1471.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.074
[8]  Moody, J. and Lingeman, J. (2001) Holmium Laser Enucleation for Prostate Adenoma Greater than 100mg: Comparison to Open Prostatectomy. The Journal of Urology, 165, 459-462.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200102000-00025
[9]  Dialo, M., Konate, M., Diakite, I., Koumare, S., Keita, M. and Somake, A. (2020) Adénome de la prostate dans l’unité de chirurgie générale du centre de santé de référence de la commune VI du district de BAMAKO. Health Sciences and Disease, 21, 65-68.
[10]  Luhuri, N., Alumeti, D., Cirimwami, P.A. and Ahuka, O. (2016) Prise en charge diagnostiques et chirurgicales de l’hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate à l’hôpital de PANZI-République. URO ANDRO, 1, 289-293.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133