全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

荆州松滋市曲尺河蕨类植物资源与观赏特性评价
Evaluation of Resources and Ornamental Characteristics of Fern in Quchi River, Songzi City, Jingzhou

DOI: 10.12677/IJE.2023.123036, PP. 297-303

Keywords: 园林应用,蕨类植物,层次分析法,观赏特性
Landscape Application
, Fern, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Ornamental Characteristics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

以湖北省荆州松滋市曲尺河为调查地,对当地蕨类植物资源的观赏性状进行调查统计,通过层次分析法(Analysis Hierarchy Process, AHP)对26种蕨类植物进行观赏价值综合评价,选择根状茎、叶片、孢子囊群三个评价准则和15个评价因子建立曲池河蕨类植物观赏性状评价体系,对26种蕨类植物进行观赏等级划分,以期对蕨类在园林景观中的运用提供依据。结果表明,在一级指标中,叶片所占权重最高,是影响蕨类植物观赏价值最重要的指标。在二级指标中,叶形、幼叶颜色、叶稀有度、叶色对蕨类植物观赏价值的影响权重均超过10%,对评价结果有较大影响。参评植物中,综合评价Ⅰ级的有苏铁蕨(Brainea insignis)、荚囊蕨(Struthiopteris eburnea)、海金沙(Lygodium japonicum)、银粉背蕨(Aleuritopteris argentea)、乌蕨(Odontosoria chinensis)、卷柏(Selaginella tamariscina),这六种蕨类植物观赏价值较高,具有较好的园林应用前景。
Taking Quchi River, Songzi City, Jingzhou, Hubei Province as the survey site, the ornamental characteristics of local ferns resources were investigated and counted, and the ornamental value of 26 species of ferns was comprehensively evaluated by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Three evaluation criteria and 15 evaluation factors were selected to establish the appraisal system of ornamental characteristics of ferns in Quchi River, The ornamental grade of 26 species of ferns was divided in order to provide a basis for the application of ferns in landscape architecture. The results showed that the weight of leaves was the highest among the first-grade indexes, which was the most important index affecting the ornamental value of ferns. In the secondary indicators, the weight of leaf shape, young leaf color, leaf rarity and leaf color on the ornamental value of ferns is more than 10%, which has a great impact on the evaluation results. Among the participating plants, the comprehensive evaluation of grade I included Brainea insignis, Struthiopteris eburnea, Lygodium japonicum, Aleuritopteris argentea, Odontosoria chinensis, and Selaginella tamariscina. These six kinds of ferns have high ornamental value and have good garden application prospects.

References

[1]  秦仁昌. 中国植物志: 第二卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1959.
[2]  中国科学院植物研究所. 中国高等植物图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1972.
[3]  匡丽红, 秦华, 杨慧. 浅议蕨类植物的观赏特性及其在园林中的应用[J]. 现代农业科技, 2006(17): 59-60.
[4]  梁芳, 王文哲. 浅谈观赏蕨类的开发利用研究[J]. 农技服务, 2014, 31(7): 256, 266.
[5]  Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.
https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804
[6]  赵焕臣, 许树柏, 金生. 层次分析法: 一种简易的新决策方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986.
[7]  范丽琨, 罗振宇. 杭州西湖景区蕨类资源观赏应用价值的综合评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(3): 5-8.
[8]  贺珊, 周厚高, 王文通, 等. 观赏蕨类植物的美学特征与评价标准[J]. 广东园林, 2003(3): 34-37, 45.
[9]  吴林源, 黄稚清, 丁释丰, 等. 基于AHP法的润楠属树种观赏性评价[J]. 福建林业科技, 2019, 46(4): 70-72, 82.
[10]  宋敏, 余萍, 张慧会, 等. 基于AHP的北京市银杏单株观赏价值评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(22): 90-97.
[11]  Daniel, T.C. (2001) Whither Scenic Beauty? Visual Landscape Quality Assessment in the 21st Century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 267-281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
[12]  许玉凤, 于瀚翔, 伊宏峰, 等. 熵AHP层次分析法对引种玉簪品种的综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(16): 75-80.
[13]  梁鸣, 孙波, 杨轶华, 等. 黑龙江省秋季红叶植物资源观赏性评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2008, 36(7): 84-86.
[14]  王燕, 谢云. 蕨类植物在翠华山的观赏性评价及园林应用[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015(2): 288-292.
[15]  刘均阳, 李佳, 刘建军. 太白山蕨类植物的观赏性评价及园林应用[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(2): 222-226.
[16]  陈欣瑜. 缙云山蕨类植物资源评价与三种野生观赏蕨引种繁育研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.27684/d.cnki.gxndx.2020.004980

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133