|
论《俄狄浦斯王》中的无知与有知
|
Abstract:
通过对戏剧《俄狄浦斯王》的分析得出人的自我认知会经历虚假的无知、虚假的有知、真正的“无知”三个阶段。虚假的无知体现了人虽处于无知无欲状态,但不自知,此时也并未与外在产生联系;虚假的有知体现了人在追寻自认为更好的生活中却无知善恶、向外追寻物欲,最后自愿沦为物质的奴隶;真正的“无知”体现了人对未来的无知,一生将在自由选择中去探寻以怎样的方式能达到更好的生活。
Through the analysis of the drama Oedipus the King, it is concluded that human self cognition will go through three stages: false ignorance, false knowledge and real ignorance. False ignorance reflects that although a person is in a state of ignorance and lack of desire, they are not aware of themselves and do not have any connection with the outside world at this time; false knowledge reflects the ignorance of good and evil, the pursuit of material desires, and the voluntary enslavement of material possessions in the pursuit of what one considers a better life; true ignorance reflects a person’s ignorance of the future, and they will explore how to achieve a better life through free choice throughout their lifetime.
[1] | 索福克勒斯. 索福克勒斯悲剧五种[M]. 罗念生, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 69. |
[2] | 柏拉图. 柏拉图全集(第一卷) [M]. 王晓朝, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2002: 188. |
[3] | 李聃. 道德经[M]. 赵炜编, 译. 西安: 三秦出版社, 2018: 65. |
[4] | 奥古斯丁. 论自由意志: 奥古斯丁对话录2篇[M]. 成官泯, 译. 上海: 上海世纪出版集团, 2010: 75. |
[5] | 洪应明. 菜根谭[M]. 西安: 三秦出版社, 2018: 53. |
[6] | 柏拉图. 苏格拉底的申辩[M]. 吴飞, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2017: 138. |
[7] | 邓晓芒, 赵林. 西方哲学史[M]. 武汉: 高等教育出版社, 2014: 44. |