|
儒家与道家社会治理思想比较研究
|
Abstract:
儒家与道家的社会治理思想在中国传统思想文化中占有十分重要的地位,根据不同历史时期的时代特点不断发展更新,并对社会治理实践起到了无可替代的重要作用。二者在不断发展过程中也呈现出不同的特性,其中儒家的入世思想和道家的出世之学是二者最显著的区别。对于当今社会治理,儒家和道家的社会治理思想仍然焕发着强大的生机与活力,具有重要的时代价值,应当取其精华去其糟粕,将二者的优势充分结合探索出新的社会治理模式。
The social governance ideas of Confucianism and Taoism occupy a very important position in traditional Chinese thought and culture, and have continuously developed and evolved according to the characteristics of different historical periods, and have played a role that cannot be replaced. The two present different characteristics in the process of continuous development and evolution, of which the Confucian idea of accession and the Taoist theory of birth are the most significant differences. For today’s social governance, the social governance ideas of Confucianism and Taoism are still full of vitality and have important epochal value, and we should take its essence and remove its waste, and fully combine the advantages of the two to explore a new social governance model.
[1] | 王伟进. 儒家社会治理思想及其当下意义[J]. 江淮论坛, 2021(2): 153-160. |
[2] | 张春贵. 儒家社会治理思想的价值取向分析——论李觏与朱熹对儒家核心价值体系的不同梳理[J]. 中共贵州省委党校学报, 2012(4): 83-87. |
[3] | 老子. 道德经[M]//国学整理社. 诸子集成. 北京: 中华书局, 2006. |
[4] | 陈徽. 论齐物说及相应治道思想在先秦道家中的演变[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2022, 64(6): 25-35+112. |
[5] | 祁志祥. 安其性命之情——《庄子》思想的核心追求与整体把握[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 38(1): 174-188. |
[6] | 李素军. 从“涤除玄览”到“曲因其当”——论汉初黄老道家“无为而无不为”如何可能[J]. 中国哲学史, 2020(2): 71-76+84. |
[7] | 王杰, 顾建军. 儒家治国方略对构建和谐社会的启示[J]. 中共中央党校学报, 2009, 13(2): 19-22. |
[8] | 岳轩宇. 儒家德治思想对中国当代社会治理模式重构的启示[J]. 领导科学论坛, 2020(1): 25-28+49. |