|
风险感知对消费行为的影响:负性情绪与应对风格链式中介
|
Abstract:
目的:考察突发性公共事件下大学生风险感知与非理性消费的关系以及负性情绪和应对风格链式中介作用。方法:采用新冠肺炎疫情风险感知量表、正负性情绪量表、中国成年人应对风格量表和非理性消费问卷,对1910名大学生进行问卷调查,采用SPSS 26.0进行描述统计分析,采用PROCESS 3.5进行链式中介效应分析。研究结果:(1) 风险感知与负性情绪、注重问题应对、注重情绪应对、非理性消费显著正相关(r = 0.743, 0.525, 0.525, 0.566, P < 0.01);负性情绪与注重问题应对、注重情绪应对显著正相关(r = 0.554, 0.554, P < 0.01);(2) 负性情绪在风险感知和非理性消费中的中介效应显著[效应值为0.231,Boot SE = 0.036, 95% CI (0.161~0.302)];注重问题应对在风险感知和非理性消费中的中介效应显著[效应值为0.114, Boot SE = 0.020, 95%CI (0.076~0.156)];注重情绪应对在风险感知和非理性消费中的中介效应显著[效应值为0.114, Boot SE = 0.020, 95%CI (0.077~0.156)];(3) 负性情绪与注重问题应对方式在风险感知和非理性消费中的链式中介效应显著[效应值为0.126, Boot SE = 0.016, 95%CI (0.095~0.160)];负性情绪与注重情绪应对方式在风险感知和非理性消费中的链式中介效应显著[效应值为0.126, Boot SE = 0.017, 95%CI (0.094~0.159)]。结论:风险感知可以直接影响大学生非理性消费行为,还可以通过负性情绪和应对风格的单独中介和链式中介作用间接影响大学生非理性消费行为。
Objective: To investigate the relationship between college students’ risk perception and irrational consumption, as well as the chained mediating effect of negative emotion and coping style under sudden public events. Methods: Using the COVID-19 Epidemic Risk Perception Scale, the Positive and Negative Emotion Scale, the Chinese Adult Coping Style Scale and the Irrational Consumption Questionnaire, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 1910 college students. SPSS 26.0 was used for descriptive statistical analysis, and PROCESS 3.5 was used to conduct chain mediation analysis. Research results are: (1) Risk perception is significantly positively correlated with negative emotions, problem-focused coping, emotional coping, and irrational consumption (r = 0.743, 0.525, 0.525, 0.566, P < 0.01); negative disposition was significantly positively correlated with problem coping and emotional coping (r = 0.554, 0.554, P < 0.01); (2) Negative emotion has a significant mediating effect between risk perception and irrational consumption [Effect value = 0.231, Boot SE = 0.036, 95% CI (0.161~0.302)]; focusing on problem-solving has a significant mediating effect between risk perception and irrational consumption [Effect value = 0.114, Boot SE = 0.020, 95% CI (0.076~0.156)]; emphasis on emotional coping has a significant mediating effect between risk perception and irrational consumption [Effect value = 0.114, Boot SE = 0.020, 95% CI (0.077~0.156)]; (3) Negative emotions and problem-focused coping styles have a significant chain mediating effect on risk perception and irrational consumption [Effect value = 0.126, Boot SE = 0.016, 95% CI (0.095~0.160)]; negative emotions and emotional coping styles have a significant chain mediating effect on risk perception and irrational consumption [Effect value = 0.126,
[1] | 黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民(2003). 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 17(1), 54-56. |
[2] | 金晓彤, 宋伟, 赵太阳, 姚凤(2020). 公共卫生事件对居民非理性消费行为的影响. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 40(4), 50-60. |
[3] | 李金曦(2021). 突发性公共卫生事件下风险感知对非理性消费的影响. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京师范大学. |
[4] | 梁宝勇, 吴雨晨(2013). 心理健康素质测评系统?中国成年人应对风格量表的编制. 心理与行为研究, 11(1), 9-15. |
[5] | 孙越异(2019). 应对方式与心理弹性关系的拟合优度研究. 博士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学. |
[6] | 唐凤(2021). 重大突发公共卫生事件中的信息疫情管理研究. 情报探索, (3), 84-90. |
[7] | 王一, 高俊岭, 陈浩, 毛一蒙, 陈苏虹(2020). 2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情期间公众媒体暴露及其与心理健康的关系. 复旦学报(医学版), 47(2), 173-178. |
[8] | 王梓琪, 王可山, 刘华(2021). 新冠肺炎疫情对高校研究生心理行为的影响及应对. 统计与管理, 35, 18-24. |
[9] | 席居哲, 佘壮, 鞠康, 赵婧婧, 侯湘铃, 彭雅楠, 李妍, 左志宏(2020). 新冠肺炎疫情风险感知量表的编制和效度验证. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 131-141. |
[10] | 张伯明, 王艳华, 梁明明, 赵科, 傅小兰(2023). 新冠疫情风险感知对焦虑的影响: 有调节的中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 31(1), 213-217. |
[11] | 张睿, 杨茗, 曹若湘, 肖琴(2022). 新冠肺炎疫情常态化防控下北京市居民疫情风险感知现状及影响因素分析. 现代预防医学, 49, 193-195+212. |
[12] | 赵建芳, 马东华, 刘勇, 高腾凤, 刘秀荣(2022). 新冠肺炎疫情风险感知对囤积行为的影响: 安全感的中介作用和生命史策略的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 30(4), 856-860. |
[13] | 赵太阳(2018). 自我威胁情境下控制感对消费者商品选择偏好和消费倾向的影响研究. 博士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学. |
[14] | 朱平, 张权(2023). 疫情风险感知对大学生抑郁影响的中介效用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 31(7), 961-966. |
[15] | Abendroth, L. J., & Diehl, K. (2006). Now or Never: Effects of Limited Purchase Opportunities on Patterns of Regret over Time. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1086/508438 |
[16] | Adkins, N. R., & Ozanne, J. L. (2005). The Low Literate Consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 93-105.
https://doi.org/10.1086/429603 |
[17] | Entradas, M. (2022). In Science We Trust: The Effects of Information Sources on COVID-19 Risk Perceptions. Health Communication, 37, 1715-1723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1914915 |
[18] | Galoni, C., Carpenter, G. S., & Rao, H. (2020). Disgusted and Afraid: Consumer Choices under the Threat of Contagious Disease. Journal of Consumer Research, 47, 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa025 |
[19] | Gómez-Galán, J., Martínez-López, J. á., Lázaro-Pérez, C., & Sán-chez-Serrano, J. L. S. (2020). Social Networks Consumption and Addiction in College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Educational Approach to Responsible Use. Sustainability, 12, Article No. 7737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187737 |
[20] | Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M. G., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007). How Business Cycles Contribute to Private-Label Success: Evidence from the United States and Europe. Journal of Marketing, 71, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.001 |
[21] | Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company. |
[22] | Oosterhoff, B., & Palmer, C. A. (2020). Attitudes and Psychological Factors Associated with News Monitoring, Social Distancing, Disinfecting, and Hoarding Behaviors among US Adolescents during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. JAMA Pediatrics, 174, 1184-1190. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1876 |
[23] | Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2004). The Reflexive Rela-tionship between Consumer Behavior and Adaptive Coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1086/422121 |
[24] | Qiu, J., Shen, B., Zhao, M., Wang, Z., Xie, B., & Xu, Y. (2020). A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Chinese People in the COVID-19 Epidemic: Implications and Policy Recommendations. General Psychiatry, 33, e100213.
https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213 |
[25] | Ray, C., Lindop, J., & Gibson, S. (1982). The Concept of Coping. Psychological Medicine, 12, 385-395.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700046729 |
[26] | Rose, R. L., & Wood, S. L. (2005). Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity through Reality Television. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1086/432238 |
[27] | Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Unethical for the Sake of the Group: Risk of Social Exclusion and Pro-Group Unethical Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 98-113.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036708 |