Flight Behavioural Responses for African Ungulates across Species and Vegetation Covers in a Trophy Hunting Ecosystem: A Case Study from Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania
Trophy hunting has severe consequences on wild animals’ behaviors, which in return has implications for affecting wildlife populations. The Selous Game Reserve is a protected area in Tanzania that has been subjected to commercial trophy hunting for decades, and information about the effects of trophy hunting on animals’ welfare is still scarce. The Flight Initiating Distance (FID) can be a good measure to evaluate the welfare of animals and the level of risk perception towards anthropogenic disturbances, including trophy hunting. The study used linear mixed models to assess the flight responses of twelve commonly hunted species in the Selous game reserve (S.G.R.). The study compared animal vigilance between species, vegetation types, and group size. The FID varied between species, with which more vigilance was observed in zebras, elands, wildebeests, and sable antelopes. The study found a significant influence of vegetation cover on individual species’ FID. Further, the study found a significant influence of group size on animals’ vigilance (L. M. M., 95% CI = 0.590 - 4.762), in which there was a decrease in FID with an increase in group size for wildebeests. At the same time, other species, such as buffaloes, eland, hartebeests, and zebras, had their FIDs increasing with the increase in group size. We conclude that the impact of trophy hunting on savannah ungulates varies between species, vegetation covers, and group size of individual species. Regulatory authorities should consider minimum approach distances by trophy hunters in different vegetation cover to reduce animal biological disturbances.
References
[1]
Muposhi, V.K., Gandiwa, E., Makuza, S.M. and Bartels, P. (2016) Trophy Hunting and Perceived Risk in Closed Ecosystems: Flight Behavior of Three Gregarious African Ungulates in a Semi-Arid Tropical Savanna. Austral Ecology, 41, 809-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12367
[2]
Stankowich, T. (2008) Ungulate Flight Responses to Human Disturbance: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Biological Conservation, 141, 2159-2173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.026
[3]
Ciuti, S., Northrup, J., Muhly, T., Simi, M.M., Pitt, J. and Boyce, M. (2012) Effects of Humans on Behavior of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear. PLOS ONE, 7, e50611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050611
[4]
Gaynor, K., Hajnowski, C., Carter, N. and Brashares, J. (2018) The Effects of Human Disturbances on Wildlife Nocturnality. Science, 360, 1232-1235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7121
[5]
Frid, A. and Dill, L. (2002) Human-Caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk. Conservation Ecology, 6, Article No. 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00404-060111
[6]
Cooper, W.E. and Frederick, W.G. (2010) Predator Lethality, Optimal Escape Behavior, and Autotomy. Behavioural Ecology, 21, 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp151
[7]
Ydenberg, R.C. and Dill, L.M. (1986) The Economics of Fleeing from Predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 16, 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60192-8
[8]
Blumstein, D.T. (2003) Flight-Initiation Distance in Birds Is Dependent on Intruder’s Starting Distance. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 67, 852-857. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802692
[9]
Dumont, F., Reale, D., Pasquarettta, C., Hardenberg, A. and Bogliani, G. (2012) Flight Initiation Distance and Starting Distance: Biological Effect or Mathematical Artefact? Ethology, 118, 1051-1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12006
[10]
Fernandez-Juricic, E., Venier, M.P., Renison, D. and Blumstein, D.T. (2005) Sensitivity of Wildlife to Spatial Patterns of Recreationist Behavior: A Critical Assessment of Minimum Approaching Distances and Buffer Areas for Grassland Birds. Biological Conservation, 125, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.020
[11]
Tarakini, T., Crosmary, W.G., Fritz, H. and Mundy, P. (2014) Flight Behavioral Responses to Sport Hunting by Two African Herbivores. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 44, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.3957/056.044.0110
[12]
Stankowich, T. and Coss, R.G. (2006) Effects of Predator Behaviour and Proximity on Risk Assessment by Colombian Black-Tailed Deer. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arj020
[13]
Reimers, E. and Colman, J. (2006) Reindeer and Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) Response towards Human Activities. Rangifer, 26, 55-71. https://doi.org/10.7557/2.26.2.188
[14]
TAWA (2020) Tanzania Wildlife Management Authority—Tawa United Republic of Tanzania. 121(April), 0-19.
[15]
Cooper, W.E. and Frederick, W.G. (2007) Optimal Flight Initiation Distance. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 244, 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.011
[16]
Rodriguez-Prieto, I., Fernández-Juricic, E., Martín, J. and Regis, Y. (2009) Antipredator Behavior in Blackbirds: Habituation Complements Risk Allocation. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn151
[17]
Miller, S.G., Knight, R.L. and Clinton, K.M. (2001) Wildlife Responses to Pedestrians and Dogs. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 124-132.
[18]
Stankowich, T. and Blumstein, D. (2005) Fear in Animals: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Risk Assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 27, 22627-2634. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3251
[19]
Brubaker, A. and Coss, R.G. (2016) Effects of Single- and Mixed-Species Group Composition on the Flight Initiation Distances of Plains and Grevy’s Zebra. Ethology, 122, 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12500
[20]
Tarlow, E.M. and Blumstein, D.T. (2007) Evaluating Methods to Quantify Anthropogenic Stressors on Wild Animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102, 429-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.040
[21]
Norwegian Meteorological Institute (2022) Weather Forecasting: Selous Game Reserve.
[22]
Baldus, R. (2009) The Selous-Niassa Wildlife Corridor in Tanzania: Biodiversity Conservation from the Grassroots. Practical Experiences and Lessons from Integrating Local Communities into Transboundary Natural Resources Management. Budapest. 48 p.
Setsaas, T.H., Holmern, T., Mwakalebe, G., Stokke, S. and Røskaft, E. (2007) How Does Human Exploitation Affect Impala Populations in Protected and Partially Protected Areas? A Case Study from the Serengeti Ecosystem, Tanzania. Biological Conservation, 136, 563-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.001
[25]
R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
[26]
Tammie, M.A., Anne, W.G. and David, A.P. (2005) Factors Affecting the Vigilance and Flight Behavior of Impalas. African Journal of Wildlife Research, 35, 1-11.
[27]
Furstenburg, D. (2012) Elands Facts (Tragelaphus oryx) S.A Hunter 08067:32-34.
[28]
Samia, D., Nakagawa, S., Nomura, F., Rangel, T.F. and Blumstein, D.T. (2015) Increased Tolerance to Humans among Disturbed Wildlife. Nature Communications, 6, Article No. 8877. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9877
[29]
Testroote, E. (2018) Vigilance and Flight Behavior in Herds of Three Different Ungulate Species: Zebra, Wildebeest and Impala. Resource Ecology Group.
