|
大学生抑郁与五态人格、社会支持及生活事件的关系
|
Abstract:
目的:探讨大学生的抑郁与五态人格、社会支持及生活事件的关系。方法:选取1600名大学生,采用贝克抑郁自评量表(BDI)、五态人格测验(FPPI)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)和青少年生活事件量表(ASLEC)分别测量其抑郁、五态人格、社会支持及生活事件现状。结果:大学生的抑郁检出率为48.1%,重度抑郁检出率为3.5%,专科生的BDI总分高于本科生(P < 0.001);FPPI中少阳、阴阳平和、太阴型人格维度上的得分显著低于全国高校同龄常模(P < 0.05);SSRS上本科生、非独生子女得分显著高于专科生、独生子女(P < 0.01);ASLEC上男大学生、专科生、非独生子女、农村生源大学生的得分显著高于女大学生、本科生、独生子女、城镇大学生(P < 0.05);BDI总分与FPPI中太阳、少阳、阴阳平和分量表得分及SSRS得分呈负相关(r = ?0.1~?0.33, P < 0.01),与太阴分量表及ASLEC得分呈正相关(r = 0.52, r = 0.38, P < 0.01);太阴、ASLEC总分及学历对BDI总分有正向预测作用,太阳和阴阳平和及SSRS总分对BDI总分有负向预测作用,其联合解释率为61.7%。结论:大学生抑郁受到太阴人格及生活事件的正向影响,受太阳、阴阳平和及社会支持的负向影响。
Objective: To explore the relationship of depression to five-pattern personality, social support and life events in college students. Method: 1600 college students were selected. Beck Depression Rating Scale (BDI), Five-Pattern Personality Inventory (FPPI), Social Support Revalued Scale (SSRS) and Adolescent Self-Rating Life Events Check List (ASLEC) were adopted to measure the college students’ depression, five-pattern personality, social support and life events, respectively. Result: The prevalence of depression was 48.1%, and the prevalence of major depression was 3.5%. The total BDI score of junior college students is higher than that of undergraduates (P < 0.001). The scores of Shaoyang, equilibrium of Yin and Yang, Taiyin personality dimensions in FPPI were significantly lower than the national norm of the same age (P < 0.05). The scores of undergraduates and non-only children on SSRS were significantly higher than those of junior college students and only children (P < 0.01). The ASLEC scores of male college students, junior college students, non-only-child students and rural college students were significantly higher than those of female college students, undergraduates, only-child students and urban college students (P < 0.05). The total score of BDI was negatively correlated with the scores of Taiyang, Shaoyang, equilibrium of Yin and Yang in FPPI and SSRS (r = ?0.1~?0.33, P < 0.01), and positively correlated with the scores of Taiyin and ASLEC (r = 0.52, r = 0.38, P < 0.01). The score of Taiyin, ASLEC and educational background had positive predictive effect on the total score of BDI, while the score of Taiyang, equilibrium of Yin and Yang and SSRS had negative predictive effect on the total score of BDI, with the joint interpretation rate of 61.7%. Conclusion: The depression of college students was affected positively by Taiyin personality and life events, and affected negatively by Taiyang, equilibrium of Yin and Yang and social support.
[1] | 程刚, 张大均(2018). 家庭社会经济地位对大学新生抑郁情绪的影响: 有调节的中介模型. 心理与行为研究, 16(2), 247-252. |
[2] | 程冉, 王玉锋(2012). 新乡市大学生抑郁与人格特征的相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(6), 923-924. |
[3] | 戴晓阳(2010). 常用心理量表评估手册. 人民军医出版社. |
[4] | 傅小兰, 张侃(2021). 中国国民心理健康发展报告(2019-2020). 社会科学文献出版社. |
[5] | 傅小兰, 张侃(2023). 中国国民心理健康发展报告(2021-2022). 社会科学文献出版社. |
[6] | 傅晓荟, 李丽萍(2007). 大学生自杀态度与抑郁情况研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 15(1), 42-44. |
[7] | 高海燕, 门伯媛(2005). 某高校大学生抑郁状况调查. 疾病控制杂志, 9(3), 228-230. |
[8] | 郝阳, 吕行, 安献丽, 余良明, 方旭(2022). 应激性生活事件与青少年非自杀性自伤: 有调节的中介效应. 中华疾病控制杂志, 26(6), 668-672. |
[9] | 洪炜, 姬雪松, 马晓军(2004). 抑郁障碍患者人格特征与发病关系的研究. 中国行为医学科学, (5), 26-27. |
[10] | 胡义秋, 王冰蕊, 黎志华(2015). “90后”大学生心理健康、主观幸福感和个性的相关研究. 大学教育科学, 2(2), 121-124. |
[11] | 姜漫莉, 李贞, 陈田林等(2018). 抑郁症患者五态人格特征调查分析. 文化创新比较研究, 2(22), 155-156. |
[12] | 蒋佩, 文瑛, 刘润达, 张智慧, 易沁龄(2023). 负性生活事件对大学新生抑郁的影响: 自我厌恶和自尊的链式中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 31(1), 110-114. |
[13] | 李娇, 周勤, 乔娟等(2022). 儿童期虐待对大学生焦虑抑郁情绪的影响: 人格、社会支持和生活事件的中介作用. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 22(12), 842-848. |
[14] | 李琼, 丁冲(2013). 中医院校本科生五态人格与心理健康的关系研究. 湖北民族学院学报(医学版), 30(2), 68-70. |
[15] | 刘琰, 谭曦, 李扬, 徐芳, 张杰, 孔军辉(2015). 大学生抑郁情绪现状及影响因素分析. 中华全科医学, 13(1), 91-93. |
[16] | 罗晴(2012). 负性生活事件对大学生心理健康的影响研究. 安康学院学报, 24(4), 112-113+119. |
[17] | 郄亚男, 吴小勇(2022). 中医学五态人格的发展及应用研究. 中医研究, 35(11), 84-88. |
[18] | 屈智勇, 张秀兰(2008). 中西部大学生抑郁现状、人群特征及干预效果. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 23(2), 120-160. |
[19] | 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 中国心理卫生杂志社. |
[20] | 辛秀红, 姚树桥(2015). 青少年生活事件量表效度与信度的再评价及常模更新. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(5), 355-360. |
[21] | 杨秋莉, 徐蕊, 于迎, 薛崇成(2010). 五态人格、体质类型与抑郁症的中医证型的关系探讨. 中医杂志, 51(7), 655-657. |
[22] | 于蒙, 向鸿, 李婵媛(2015). 高职大学新生中医“五态人格”的调查分析. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 15(17), 201+199. |
[23] | 张杰(2017). 抑郁症与中医五态人格、负性自动思维及特质应对方式相关研究. 硕士学位论文, 新乡: 新乡医学院. |
[24] | 郑开梅, 薛蕾, 甄红晅, 贾溪莲, 武成, 黄质成, 李慧吉(2007). 抑郁症的五态人格研究. 天津中医药大学学报, (2), 61-62. |
[25] | 郑雅格, 梁亮, 卞合涛, 王高华(2019). 社会支持与抑郁症关系的研究进展. 广西医学, 41(17), 2231-2233, 2238. |
[26] | Demenech, L. M., Oliveira, A. T., Neiva-Silva, L., & Dumith, S. C. (2021). Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression and Suicidal Behaviors among Brazilian Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 282, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.108 |
[27] | Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). The Impact of Daily Stress on Adolescents’ Depressed Mood: The Role of Social Support Seeking through Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.070 |
[28] | Hankin, B. L. (2015). Depression from Childhood through Adolescence: Risk Mechanisms across Multiple Systems and Levels of Analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology, 4, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.003 |
[29] | Li, C., Huang, J., Cheng, Y.-C., & Zhang, Y.-W. (2020). Traditional Chinese Medicine in Depression Treatment: From Molecules to Systems. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, Article 586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00586 |
[30] | Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2010). Relationship between Multiple Sources of Perceived Social Support and Psychological and Academic Adjustment in Early Adolescence: Comparisons across Gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9368-6 |
[31] | Saavedra, J. E. (2020). Socio-Demographic Factors and Early Life Events Associated with Happiness in Adults of Metropolitan Lima. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 37, 42-50.
https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2020.371.4580 |
[32] | Sontag, L. M., & Graber, J. A. (2010). Coping with Perceived Peer Stress: Gender-Specific and Common Pathways to Symptoms of Psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1605-1620. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020617 |