全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

岩溶含水层放水试验及水文地质条件分析
Discharge Test of Karst Aquifer and Analysis of Hydrogeological Conditions

DOI: 10.12677/ME.2023.113055, PP. 446-458

Keywords: 放水试验,中央采区,太原组含水层,顾北煤矿
Water Discharge Test
, Central Mining Area, Taiyuan Group Aquifer, Gubei Coal Mine

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

岩溶水害一直威胁着我国煤炭安全开采。以安徽淮南顾北煤矿中央1煤采区下部灰岩为对象,在分析矿井水文地质条件的基础上,在2022年5月至6月间,开展了顾北煤矿中央1煤采区C3I组灰岩放水试验工作,通过地下水动态变化分析,不同含水层之间水力联系差异较大,结果表明:中央1煤采区C3I组灰岩含水层与新生界松散层之间无水力联系,接受C3II和C3III组浅部露头区补给,无奥灰水补给。南一、北一采区与中央1煤采区间不存在明显水力联系,为三个相对独立的水文地质单元。
Karst water disaster has been threatening the safe mining of coal in China. Taking the limestone in the lower part of the central 1 coal mining area of Gubei Coal Mine in Huainan, Anhui Province as the object, based on the analysis of the hydrogeological conditions of the mine, from May to June 2022, the water discharge test of C3I group limestone in the central 1 coal mining area of Gubei Coal Mine was carried out. Through the analysis of groundwater dynamic changes, the hydraulic connection between different aquifers is quite different. The results show that there is no hydraulic connection between the C3I group limestone aquifer and the Cenozoic loose layer in the central 1 coal mining area, which is recharged by the shallow outcrop area of C3II and C3III groups, and there is no Ordovician limestone water recharge. There is no obvious hydraulic connection between the south and north mining areas and the central 1 coal mining area, which are three relatively independent hydrogeological units.

References

[1]  高延法, 章延平, 张慧敏, 等. 底板突水危险性评价专家系统及应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(2): 253-258.
[2]  虎维岳. 矿山水害防治理论与方法[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 2005.
[3]  蔡有京, 窦春远, 魏健. 顾北煤矿A组煤首采区灰岩水害探查治理技术探讨[J]. 中国煤炭, 2022, 48(1): 39-45.
[4]  赵师庆, 李平华, 叶诗忠, 等. 两淮煤田石炭二叠煤系气源岩评价及其煤成气资源量估算[J]. 淮南矿业学院学报, 1989(3): 52-58
[5]  刘会虎, 胡宝林, 薛俊华, 等. 淮南地区石炭-二叠系泥页岩有机地球化学特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(6): 2100-2109.
[6]  张磊. 深部岩溶水文地质特征及疏放性评价——以谢一煤矿为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2010.
[7]  李博. 基于变权理论的煤层底板突水脆弱性评价——以蔚矿为例[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2014.
[8]  王晓明, 周小平, 刘咏, 等. 基于水化学信息的顾北煤矿最佳突涌水水源判别模型[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2013, 20(5): 122-125.
[9]  尹尚先, 连会青, 刘德民, 等. 华北型煤田岩溶陷落柱研究70年: 成因?机理?防治[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(11): 1-29
[10]  杨婷婷, 许光泉, 余世滔, 等. 煤层下部太原组岩溶水化学组分特征及其成因分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(2): 100-108.
[11]  许波. 顾北煤矿6-2煤层水文地质与工程地质特征[J]. 军民两用技术与产品, 2015(16): 235-235.
[12]  许光泉, 桂和荣, 张连福, 等. 矿井大型放水试验及其意义[J]. 地下水, 2002, 24(4): 200-201, 237.
[13]  马莲净, 赵宝峰. 顶板含水层放水试验的钻孔单位涌水量计算方法[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(3): 49-54
[14]  卜昌森, 张希诚, 尹万才, 等. “华北型”煤田岩溶水害及防治现状[J]. 地质论评, 2001, 47(4): 405-410.
[15]  卜昌森, 张希诚. 综合水文地质勘探在煤矿岩溶水害防治中的应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2001, 29(3): 32-34.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133