全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

核心素养视域下人教A版(2019)与沪教版(2020)高中数学教材对比分析——以三角函数为例
A Comparative Analysis of High School Mathematics Textbooks from the Perspective of Core Literacy between Human Education A Edition (2019) and Shanghai Edition (2020)—Taking Trigonometric Function as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/CES.2023.117274, PP. 1846-1856

Keywords: 高中数学,教材,综合难度
High School Mathematics
, Teaching Materials, Comprehensive Difficulty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

“人教版”和“沪教版”两个不同版本高中数学教材中的“三角函数”章节的内容编排彰显了不同版本教材的编写特色。本文以人教A版(2019)与沪教版(2020)两本高中数学教材“三角函数”章节内容为例,通过对教材目录差异、内容编排、栏目设置、例习题的差异性以及例题的难度的对比分析,得出一些关于教材编排与教师教学的启示与建议,希望为以后的教材编排与教师教学提供有效参考。
The content arrangement of the “trigonometric function” chapter in the high school mathematics textbooks of the two different versions of “People’s Education Edition” and “Shanghai Education Edition” shows the compilation characteristics of the textbooks of different versions. This paper takes the contents of the “trigonometric Functions” chapter in two high school mathematics text-books, namely, Human Education A Edition (2019) and Shanghai Education Edition (2020), as examples. By comparing and analyzing the differences in textbook catalog, content arrangement, column setting, differences in example exercises and difficulty of example problems, this paper draws some inspirations and suggestions on textbook arrangement and teacher teaching. It is hoped to provide an effective reference for the textbook arrangement and teachers’ teaching in the future.

References

[1]  李亦婧. 建构观下高中数学学习模式探究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2017.
[2]  中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中数学课程标准2017年版(2020年修订) [M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[3]  鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2022, 31(9): 48-52.
[4]  陈飞.数学史渗透数学教学的研究——基于情感培养视角[J]. 科学大众(科学教育), 2018(12): 22-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.16728/j.cnki.kxdz.2018.12.018

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133