|
“捕诉合一”的正当性分析与证成
|
Abstract:
“捕诉合一”改革是检察机关为提升诉讼效率而对其内设机构进行的职能调整,这项改革因其可能弱化检察监督等原因而存在正当性层面的争议。从合法性的角度考察,“捕诉合一”改革既不违反现行的法律规则,也不违背回避原则;从合理性的角度考察,“捕诉合一”既体现了公正与效率两大诉讼理念的动态平衡,又实现了检察办案与法律监督的有机统一;从功利性的角度考察,“捕诉合一”提高了检察办案的质量,保障了犯罪嫌疑人的辩护权,提升了检察专业化水平。
The reform of integration of arrest and prosecution is the function adjustment of the procuratorial organ in order to improve the litigation efficiency. This reform is controversial in terms of justification, because it may weaken procuratorial supervision. From the perspective of legality, the reform of integration of arrest and prosecution does not violate the existing legal rules or the principle of avoidance; from the perspective of rationality, the reform of integration of arrest and prosecution not only reflects the dynamic balance between the two litigation concepts of justice and efficiency, but also realizes the organic unity of procuratorial case-handling and legal supervision; from the perspective of utilitarianism, the reform of integration of arrest and prosecution improves the quality of procuratorial case-handling, guarantees the right of defense of criminal suspects and improves the level of procuratorial professionalism.
[1] | 邓思清. 捕诉合一是中国司法体制下的合理选择[N]. 检察日报, 2018-06-06(003). |
[2] | 谢小剑. 检察机关“捕诉合一”改革质疑[J]. 东方法学, 2018(6): 106. |
[3] | 孙曙生. 权力清单制度的法理学透视[J]. 江西社会科学, 2017, 37(1): 181. |
[4] | 季卫东. 法治秩序的建构[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2019: 423. |
[5] | 徐国栋. 民法基本原则解释[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1992: 133. |
[6] | 万毅. 检察机关内设机构改革的基本理论问题[J]. 政法论坛, 2018(5): 13. |
[7] | 陈光中. 动态平衡诉讼观之我见[J]. 中国检察官, 2018(13): 4. |
[8] | 龙宗智. 动态平衡诉讼观与检察工作[J]. 中国检察官, 2018(7): 18. |
[9] | 张建伟. “捕诉合一”: 职能整合之功能分析[J]. 人民检察, 2018(14): 19. |
[10] | 沈海平. 捕诉关系的辩证思考[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2018, 26(4): 61. |
[11] | 王万华. 动态平衡诉讼观的价值及其实现进路[J]. 中国检察官, 2018(13): 9. |
[12] | 陈瑞华. 异哉, 所谓“捕诉合一”者[Z/OL]. 百度网. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/585149770, 2023-05-01. |