全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论我国刑事诉讼证人保护制度的完善
On the Perfection of the System of Witness Protection in Criminal Procedure in China

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2023.94204, PP. 1500-1506

Keywords: 证人保护,司法现状,制度完善
Witness Protection
, Judicial Status Quo, System Perfection

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

近年来,证人证言在推动刑事案件进程中的重要性愈发凸显。毫无疑问,良好的证人证言在刑事诉讼进程中对于查明案件事实具有重要作用。但近年来,证人在具体案件中的出庭率畸低,对证人的事前保护与舆论保护不到位,证人保护的外延僵硬,证人保护机关的人力财力也稍显紧张,导致刑事诉讼证人遭到来自各个方向的打击报复的现象屡有发生。在此背景下,笔者撰写本文,适当分析我国当前刑事诉讼中证人保护制度存在的问题,同时从建立统一的证人保护基金和证人保护机构等角度提出解决问题的新方法。这对于促进实现社会的公平正义,完善我国刑事诉讼证人保护制度的法律法规体系,推动司法改革进程,实现全面依法治国的总目标具有重要意义。
In recent years, witness testimony has become more and more important in promoting the process of criminal cases. There is no doubt that good witness testimony plays an important role in establishing the facts of a case during criminal proceedings. However, in recent years, the appearance rate of witnesses in specific cases is very low, the protection of witnesses in advance and the protection of public opinion is not in place, the extension of the concept “witness protection” is rigid, and the human and financial resources of witness protection organs are slightly strained, which leads to the phenomenon of criminal witnesses being attacked and retaliated from various directions. In this context, the author of this article gives the appropriate analysis of the current criminal proceedings of the witness protection system of the existing problems, at the same time puts forward new ways to solve the problem, such as establishment of a unified witness protection fund and witness protection institutions. This is of great significance to promote the realization of social fairness and justice, improve the legal and regulatory system of witness protection system in criminal procedure, promote the process of judicial reform, and realize the overall goal of comprehensively governing the country by law.

References

[1]  陈实. 刑事庭审实质化的维度与机制探讨[J]. 中国法学, 2018(1): 190-206.
[2]  包献荣. 论我国刑事诉讼中直接言词原则的实现[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2018(6): 134-144+208.
[3]  卞建林, 谢澍. 刑事诉讼法治建设七十年回顾与展望[J]. 人民检察, 2019(14): 53-59.
[4]  胡逸恬. “事实查明”模式与“权利保障”模式的融合——论证人出庭制度的功能定位[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(2): 115-124.
[5]  黄祥青. 推进以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革的若干思考[J]. 法律适用, 2018(1): 33-37.
[6]  张童. 刑事诉讼制度改革走向以审判为中心[N]. 人民法院报, 2018-10-23(002).

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133