|
|
居住权的善意取得
|
Abstract:
居住权作为我国《民法典》中新设的物权，根据我国《民法典》311条第三款规定，存在被善意取得的制度理论上的可能。然而居住权的诞生背景具有强烈的社会帮扶和伦理性，善意取得制度则侧重于维护交易安全和合理信赖，可以说两者之间从根本的法价值上就具备天然的不协调性。这种冲突体现在具体法律文本和制度中时就使得二者在衔接适用上需要结合二者特性，重新认定居住权善意取得时的具体构成。
As a new property right in China’s Civil Code, the right of residence has the theoretical possibility of being acquired in good faith according to the third paragraph of Article 311 of The Civil Code, but the birth background of the right of residence has a strong social support and ethical nature, while the good faith acquisition system focuses on maintaining the safety of transactions and reasonable trust, it can be said that the two have a natural incompatibility from the fundamental legal values, and this conflict is reflected in the specific legal text and system, which makes it necessary to combine the two in the application of the articulation of the specific composition of the right of residence in good faith acquisition.
| [1] | 王利明. 善意取得制度的构成——以我国物权法草案第111条为分析对象[J]. 中国法学, 2006(4): 79-94.
https://doi.org/10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2006.04.007 |
| [2] | 屈然. 论我国居住权的设立方式与登记效力[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(12): 90-99.
https://doi.org/10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2020.12.008 |
| [3] | 冉克平. 抵押权善意取得争议问题研究[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 40(11): 34-46. |
| [4] | 陈苇. 婚姻家庭住房权的优先保护[J]. 法学, 2010(12): 20-23. |
| [5] | 汪洋. 民法典意定居住权与居住权合同解释论[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(6): 105-119. |
| [6] | 于程远. 论法律行为定性中的“名”与“实”[J]. 法学, 2021(7): 97-112. |
| [7] | 刘贵祥. 论无权处分和善意取得的冲突和协调——以私卖夫妻共有房屋时买受人的保护为中心[J]. 法学家, 2011(5): 99-113+178. https://doi.org/10.16094/j.cnki.1005-0221.2011.05.005 |
| [8] | 王利明. 不动产善意取得的构成要件研究[J]. 政治与法律, 2008(10): 2-10. |
| [9] | 申卫星. 视野拓展与功能转换: 我国设立居住权必要性的多重视角[J]. 中国法学, 2005(5): 77-92.
https://doi.org/10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2005.05.007 |
