全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

我国环境民事公益诉讼原告主体资格探究
Explore the Qualification of the Plaintiff in Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation in Our Country

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.114382, PP. 2662-2669

Keywords: 环境保护,环境公益诉讼,原告主体资格,民事诉权
Environmental Protection
, Environmental Public Interest Litigation, The Plaintiff’s Subject Qualification, Civil Litigation Rights

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

生态文明建设是新时代中国特色社会主义的重要特征之一,党的二十大报告指出“我国的生态环境发生历史性、转折性、全局性的变化”。治理污染、保护生态文明建设的重要途径就是提起环境民事公益诉讼,而环境民事公益诉讼成立的前提就是原告主体资格的确定。目前,我国已有的法律规范中对“法律规定的机关”规定并不明确;对社会组织原告资格的限制较多;检察机关的起诉权利受到限制;公民能否成为环境民事公益诉讼原告的主体还存在分歧。这些问题都在司法实践中影响环境民事公益诉讼的进行。需要对问题进行明确和解决,以适应环境保护社会实践的需要,完善环境民事公益诉讼原告主体制度。
The construction of ecological civilization is one of the important features of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era. The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that “China’s ecological environment has undergone historical, transitional, and global changes”. The important way to control pollution and protect ecological civilization construction is to initiate environmental civil public interest litigation, and the premise for the establishment of environmental civil public interest litigation is the determination of the plaintiff's subject qualification. At present, the existing legal norms in China do not have clear provisions on the “organs stipulated by law”; there are many restrictions on the qualifications of social organizations as plaintiffs; the prosecution authority’s right to sue is restricted; there are still differences in whether citizens can become the subject of plaintiffs in environmental civil public interest litigation. These issues all affect the conduct of environmental civil public interest litigation in judicial practice. It is necessary to clarify and solve the problem in order to meet the needs of environmental protection social practice and improve the plaintiff subject system of environmental civil public interest litigation.

References

[1]  王岚. 环境权益救济困境之突破——兼议新《环境保护法》中的“公益诉讼”制度[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学?人文社会科学?社会科学), 2015(5): 43-49.
[2]  张鑫. 环境民事公益诉讼原告主体资格探究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南财经政法大学, 2022.
[3]  刘洁. 试论环境民事公益诉讼起诉主体顺位选择[J]. 河北环境工程学院学报, 2002(2): 32-34.
[4]  澎湃. 企业水污染环保组织提公益诉讼, 南昌中院: 不符条件不予受理[EB/OL]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_4143539, 2019-08-13.
[5]  王熠. 环保NGO提起环境民事公益诉讼的困境及路径选择[J]. 长治学院学报, 2020, 37(1): 10-13.
[6]  世界环境司法大会. 中国环资审判[EB/OL]. http://wej.court.gov.cn/news/view-130.html, 2018-03-02.
[7]  李挚萍. 以习近平生态文明思想和法治思想为指导推进环境法治发展[J]. 法治社会, 2021(2): 8-10.
[8]  吴俊彦. 环境民事公益诉讼的原告主体制度研究[J]. 法制与社会, 2021(5): 81-82.
[9]  刘显鹏, 赵昌盛. 检察机关参与环境民事公益诉讼诉前程序研究[J]. 保定学院学报, 2021(4): 40-44.
[10]  张宇. 论环境民事公益诉讼主体资格[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2022(17): 167-168.
[11]  李琳. 论环境民事公益诉讼之原告主体资格及顺位再调整[J]. 法学论坛, 2020(1): 162-169.
[12]  陈鹄. 我国环境民事公益诉讼原告主体制度的完善[J]. 广西质量监督导报, 2021(5): 195-197.
[13]  张楠, 朱祥贵. 环境民事公益诉讼原告主体资格研究[J]. 绥化学院学报, 2022(6): 39-41.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133