全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

民事远程庭审证人在线作证制度之完善
Perfection of Civil Remote Trial Witness Online Testifying System

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.114381, PP. 2653-2661

Keywords: 远程庭审,在线作证,情态证据,法院协助
Remote Trial
, Online Testimony, Modal Evidence, Court Assistance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着互联网的不断发展,信息技术与司法程序逐渐融合,诉讼电子化已成必然趋势,远程庭审程序下在线作证便利证人和提高证人出庭比率的同时,对法官判断证人证言真实性产生一定程度的影响,弱化“情态证据”效应,不利于实现程序公正、保障当事人的程序权利等,为充分发挥证人在线作证的价值,有必要对证人在线作证制度进行反思:怎样缓解证人在线作证制度与庭审公开直播之间的冲突、保证证人在出庭作证之前不接触到庭审的相关材料;消除其对法官判断证据真实性的影响等。同时对证人在线作证制度进行完善:优化在线作证程序;构建“法院协助”证人在线作证模式;探索体系化的在线作证适用标准等,从而更好地保障当事人的合法权益,保证司法公正,保障远程庭审程序的正常运行。
With the continuous development of the Internet and the gradual integration of information technology and judicial procedures, electronic proceedings have become an inevitable trend. Online testimony in remote trial procedures not only facilitates witnesses and improves the ratio of witnesses to appear in court, but also has a certain degree of influence on judges’ judgment of the authenticity of witness testimony. Weakening the effect of “modal evidence” is not conducive to the realization of procedural justice and the protection of procedural rights of the parties. In order to give full play to the value of online witness testimony, it is necessary to reflect on the system of online witness testimony: how to alleviate the conflict between online witness testimony system and public live broadcast of the trial, and ensure that witnesses do not have access to the relevant materials of the trial before testifying in court; eliminate its influence on the judge’s judgment of evidence authenticity and so on. At the same time to improve the system of online witness testimony: optimize the online testimony procedure; construct “court assistance” witness online testimony mode; explore the application standards of systematic online testimony, so as to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, ensure judicial justice, and ensure the normal operation of remote trial procedures.

References

[1]  杨宁芳. 言词证据如何得到辩护[J]. 政法论丛, 2016(6): 85-93.
[2]  孙长永. 英国2003年《刑事审判法》及其释义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005: 601-642.
[3]  McColl, R. (2004) IT in the Courtroom from Both Sides of the Bench—The Transformation of Justice. UTS Law Review, 12, 13-25.
[4]  张鸿绪. 论我国远程作证中情态证据的程序保障——兼评《人民法院在线诉讼规则》 [J]. 政法论丛, 2021(4): 151-160.
[5]  Cowen, T. (2008) Justice De-layed Is Justice Denied: The Rule of Law, Economic Development and the Future of the European Community Courts. European Competition Journal, 4, 1-57.
https://doi.org/10.5235/ecj.v4n1.1
[6]  [英]理查德?梅. 刑事证据[M]. 王丽等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 645.
[7]  占善刚, 王译. 互联网法院在线审理机制之检讨[J]. 江汉论坛, 2019(6): 115-122.
[8]  [英]理查德?萨斯坎德. 线上法院于未来司法[M]. 何广越, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019: 256.
[9]  何家弘, 刘品新. 证据法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019: 31.
[10]  蔡艺生. 现代司法局限背景下情态证据的证成[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2013(3): 168-171.
[11]  段厚省. 远程审判的程序正当性考察——以交往行为理论为视角[J]. 政法论丛, 2020(2): 113-126.
[12]  李经纬. 疫情防控常态化背景下民事电子诉讼制度之完善[J]. 法律适用, 2021(5): 149-155.
[13]  Wallace, A. (2011) Justice and the “Virtual” Expert: Using Remote Witness Tech-nology to Take Scientific Evidence. Master’s Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.
[14]  李峰. 远程作证的条件及其衡量——基于澳大利亚司法个案的观察[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2019(3): 49-59.
[15]  欧龙松. “法院协助”远程作证模式及其证明力研究[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 27(5): 50-52+109.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133