全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

政府数据授权运营:内涵界定、行政许可属性与规制方式
Authorized Operation of Government Data: Definition of Connotation, Attributes of Administrative Licensing, and Regulatory Methods

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.114378, PP. 2633-2639

Keywords: 政府数据授权运营,政府数据开放,政府数据开放利用,行政许可
Government Data Authorization Operations
, Government Data Opening, Government Data Utilization, Administrative License

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

政府数据授权运营是释放数据红利、推动数据经济发展的重要方式。基于实践中的运营机理与相关解释,政府数据授权运营的内涵可界定为以安全可控为前提,以释放政府数据经济价值为目的,政府授权具有专业能力和安全保障条件的市场主体,对受限开发数据进行开发利用,生成数据产品和数据服务的活动。从治理逻辑来看,安全可控原则是授权运营的前提,公共利益优先原则为授权运营的价值导向,公私合作是授权运营的开展基础。从法律属性来看,政府数据授权运营具有“禁止性”前提,是对政府数据享有管理权的各级政府代表国家向个人或组织让渡财产权利的行为,有典型的行政许可属性。从规制方式来看,由于政府数据的特殊性,政府数据授权运营协议难以归属于国有资源使用权出让协议、特许经营协议等传统行政协议,宜将认定为授权运营协议认定为新型行政协议进行规制。
Government data authorization operations are important ways to release data dividends and promote the development of data economy. Based on the operating mechanism and related interpretation in practice, the connotation of government data authorization operation can be defined as the release of government data economic value, premise of security and controlling, and the government has authorized market entities with professional capabilities and security guarantees. Data are developed and utilized to generate data products and data services. From the perspective of governance logic, the principle of security and controlling is the prerequisite for authorization operations. The principle of priority of public interest is the value orientation of authorization operations. Public and private cooperation is the foundation for the development of authorization operations. From the perspective of legal attributes, government data authorization operations have the prerequisite for “prohibition”. It is a typical administrative license attributed to individuals or organizations that governments at all levels have management rights to transfer government or organizations to individuals or organizations. From the point of regulation way, due to the particularity of government data, government authorized data operation agreement to belong to state-owned resources use right transfer agreement, franchise agreements and other traditional administrative agreement, should be identified as authorized operating agreement as the new administrative reg-ulation.

References

[1]  李海敏. 我国政府数据的法律属性与开放之道[J]. 行政法学研究, 2020(6): 144-160.
[2]  常江, 张震. 论公共数据授权运营的特点、性质及法律规制[J]. 法治研究, 2022(2): 126-135.
[3]  张会平, 顾勤, 徐忠波. 政府数据授权运营的实现机制与内在机理研究——以成都市为例[J]. 电子政务, 2021(5): 34-44.
[4]  王伟玲. 政府数据授权运营: 实践动态、价值网络与推进路径[J]. 电子政务, 2022(10): 20-32.
[5]  孟晨瑜, 杨子轩. 我国政府治理中的数据治理风险及对策初探[J]. 河北民族师范学院学报, 2022, 42(3): 84-89.
[6]  肖泽晟. 公共资源特许利益的限制与保护——以燃气公用事业特许经营权为例[J]. 行政法学研究, 2018(2): 14-34.
[7]  章剑生. 行政许可的内涵及其展开[J]. 浙江学刊, 2004(3): 102-107.
[8]  孟李冕. 行政许可的识别: 问题、构成要素与规范路径[J]. 中国行政管理, 2023(1): 36-41.
[9]  王克稳. 论行政特许及其与普通许可的区别[J]. 南京社会科学, 2011(9): 83-87+94.
[10]  王广震. 大数据的法律性质探析——以知识产权法为研究进路[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 29(4): 58-63.
[11]  王融. 关于大数据交易核心法律问题——数据所有权的探讨[J]. 大数据, 2015, 1(2): 49-55.
[12]  肖冬梅, 文禹衡. 数据权谱系论纲[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 39(6): 69-75.
[13]  尹博文. 政府数据有偿开放理论的法治建构[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2023(1): 82-92+145-146.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133