全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

行政诉权滥用规制路径探讨
Study on the Regulation of Abuse of Administrative Litigation Rights

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.114376, PP. 2621-2626

Keywords: 诉权滥用,诉的利益,规制路径
Abuse of Appeal Rights
, The Benefits of Complaints, Regulatory Path

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

我国行政诉权滥用案件日益增多,因滥诉行为不具有诉的利益,无端给行政、司法程序和资源增加负累,需要加以规制。目前一些典型案例,虽然为行政诉权滥用认定和规制树立风向标,但是,在我国的行政体系中,未对行政诉权滥用规制体系进行建构,故有必要探究并完善行政诉权滥用的规制路径。
Cases of the abuse of administrative right of appeal are increasing in our country. Because mutilate behavior does not have the advantage of suing, it adds burden to administrative, judicial process and resources without end, and it needs to be regulated. At present, in some typical cases, although they set up wind signs to recognize and regulate the abuse of administrative litigation right, there are no constructing regulations system of administrative litigation right abuse in administrative system of our country, so it is necessary to explore and perfect regulations path of administrative litigation right abuse.

References

[1]  孔繁华. 滥用行政诉权之法律规制[J]. 政法论坛, 2017, 35(4): 90-101.
[2]  朱雨昕. 滥用行政诉权行为的司法识别与规制——以102份申请履行法定职责案件判决书为分析样本[J]. 南海法学, 2019, 3(4): 70-82.
[3]  张卫平. 诉的利益: 内涵、功用与制度设计[J]. 法学评论, 2017, 35(4): 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.13415/j.cnki.fxpl.2017.04.001
[4]  黄先雄, 黄婷. 行政诉讼立案登记制的立法缺陷及应对[J]. 行政法学研究, 2015(6): 20-28.
[5]  王晓, 任文松. 民事诉权滥用的法律规制[J]. 现代法学, 2015, 37(5): 183-193.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133