全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

理想类型在法学领域的建构和实践——以刑法典和刑法修正案的社会实效为切入点
The Construction and Practice of the Ideal Type in the Field of Law—Starting from the Social Effectiveness of the Criminal Code and the Criminal Law Amendment

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.114375, PP. 2614-2620

Keywords: 理想类型,社会理论法学,刑法教义学,价值补充
Ideal Type
, Homos Prudence, Criminal Law Doctrine, The Value Supplement

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

韦伯“理想类型”的社会学概念已经广为人知,但在作为社会科学的法学领域却少有人将其运用到法学实践中。笔者沿着社会理论法学的路径引介了韦伯的“理想类型”的社会概念和方法论,并对该理论在法学领域的运用进行了运作探索。本文“理想类型”扮演了出于理论而适用于部门法实践的角色,笔者以刑法教义学的社会实效为切入点,对刑法教义学主张的观点——维护刑法典的规范性和权威性,在实践上进行了逻辑批驳。本文在刑法修正案的教义学问题的提出和解决上沿用理想类型的理念模型,在此基础上对具体化的社会理论的法学领域的实践进行了探索,以期提供社会理论法学在实践上对教义学的价值补充,为实质、具象上的社会理论法学发展做出贡献。
Weber’s sociological concept of “ideal type” is widely known, but few people have applied it to legal practice in the field of law as a social science. The author introduces the social concept and methodology of the “ideal type” of Weber, and explores the application of this theory in the field of law. In this paper, “ideal type” plays a role applicable to the practice of department law out of theory. Taking the social effect of criminal law pedagogy as the starting point, the author maintains the standardization and authority of the viewpoint of criminal law pedagogy and logically refuted the criminal law in practice. This paper continues to use the ideal type of conceptual model in proposing and solving the doctrinal issues of the Criminal Law Amendment, and explores the practical application of concrete social theory in the field of law, in order to provide the value supplement of social theory law to doctrinal practice and contribute to the development of substantive and concrete social theory law.

References

[1]  张帅. 马克斯?韦伯社会科学方法论的“理想类型”方法[J]. 山西煤炭管理干部学院学报, 2007(3): 99-101.
[2]  李强. 自由主义[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1998.
[3]  蒋传光, 杨文杰. 马克斯·韦伯法社会学方法论探源[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(4): 146-150.
[4]  杨帆. 法社会学能处理规范性问题吗?——以法社会学在中国法理学中的角色为视角[J]. 法学家, 2021(6): 30-44, 191, 192.
[5]  马克斯?韦伯. 学术与政治[M]. 闫克文, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2021: 27.
[6]  陆宇峰. 社会理论法学: 定位、功能与前景[J]. 清华法学, 2017, 11(2): 93-109.
[7]  尤里乌斯·冯·基尔希曼. 作为科学的法学的无价值性——在柏林法学会的演讲[J]. 赵阳, 译. 比较法研究, 2004(1): 140.
[8]  张明楷. 许霆案的刑法学分析[J]. 中外法学, 2009, 21(1): 30-56.
[9]  李石. 政治哲学十讲[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2019.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133