|
基于“洞穴奇案”引发的法理学思考
|
Abstract:
法律与道德是紧密相连且不可分割的整体,二者相互促进、发展和融合。为从多视角剖析法理学里的经典案例,揭示法律与道德之间亘古存在的内在联系,本文聚焦“洞穴奇案”这一典型案例,分析探讨在面对秩序与正义、道德与法律时人们的立场选择问题,进而立足法理学角度,对案件中各方争议焦点进行法理视域下的分析,揭示案件中蕴含的深层价值与现实意义,认为应做出有罪判决。
Law and morality are closely linked and inseparable whole, and they promote, develop and integrate with each other. In order to analyze the classic cases in jurisprudence from multiple perspectives and reveal the eternal internal relationship between law and morality, this paper focuses on the typical case of “Cave Strange Case”, analyzes and discusses the choice of people’s positions in the face of order and justice, morality and law, and then analyzes the controversial focus of all parties in the case from the perspective of jurisprudence, revealing the deep value and practical significance contained in the case, and holds that a guilty verdict should be made.
[1] | 姜意丰. “洞穴奇案”的法理思考[J]. 镇江高专学报, 2019, 32(2): 55-58. |
[2] | 程慧坤. “洞穴奇案”引发的法律与道德关系的思考[J]. 法制博览, 2022, 884(24): 145-147. |
[3] | 田宏杰. 法律与道德: 正义的法哲学及其发展——以瑞特纳帕拉法学思想研究为核心[J]. 法学杂志, 2022, 43(1): 1-19. |
[4] | 李京津. 浅析“洞穴奇案”中的法律价值冲突[J]. 法制博览, 2019(26): 31-32. |
[5] | 王素素. 富勒: 法律与道德的关系及影响[J]. 法制与社会, 2021(6): 1-2. |
[6] | 王涛至, 王艳. 洞穴奇案维持有罪判决的原因[J]. 法制博览, 2021(24): 30-32. |