全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

我国环境行政处罚从轻、减轻适用的现状、问题及对策
The Current Situation, Problems, and Countermeasures of Lenient and Mitigated Application of Environmental Administrative Penalties in China

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.114347, PP. 2424-2431

Keywords: 环境行政处罚,从轻处罚,减轻处罚
Environmental Administrative Penalties
, Lighter Penalties, Reduced Penalties

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在环境行政处罚的过程中,行政机关正确适用法律对具有法定从轻、减轻情形的当事人进行行政处罚,既是保证行政处罚过罚相当的要求,也是实现教育与惩罚相结合目的的需要。但由于我国部分地方规定的环境行政处罚从轻、减轻情形较为简略粗糙、混乱、不完整、不合法、加上我国环境执法人员执法水平不高,对从轻处罚、减轻处罚的理解和适用有失偏颇、环境行政处罚的过程缺乏有效的监督程序,导致我国环境行政处罚过程中从轻、减轻处罚的适用存在较大的问题。故本文经过查阅整理各个地区环境行政处罚从轻、减轻的相关规定的基础上,分析我国从轻、减轻行政处罚的现状及适用问题,以期裨益于生态环境主管部门在实践中修订较为规范合法的裁量基准,规范环境处罚执法行为。
In the process of environmental administrative penalties, the administrative authorities correctly apply the law to the parties with legal mitigating circumstances to administrative penalties, both to ensure that the administrative penalties are equivalent requirements, but also to achieve the purpose of combining education and punishment. However, due to the abbreviated, rough, confusing, incomplete and illegal circumstances of the environmental administrative penalties stipulated in some places in China, coupled with the low level of law enforcement of our environmental law enforcement officers, the biased understanding and application of mitigated penalties and the lack of effective supervision procedures in the process of environmental administrative penalties, there are major problems in the application of mitigated penalties in the process of environmental administrative penalties in China. Therefore, this paper, after reviewing and organizing the environmental administrative penalties in various regions, has found that the application of mitigated penalties in China is problematic. Therefore, this paper analyzes the current situation and application of lenient and mitigated administrative penalties in China based on the review and collation of relevant provisions on lenient and mitigated environmental administrative penalties in various regions, in order to benefit the ecological and environmental authorities in practice to revise a more standardized and legitimate discretionary benchmark and regulate the enforcement of environmental penalties.

References

[1]  罗秋. 从轻或减轻处罚须依法裁量[N]. 中国医药报, 2017-04-07(004).
[2]  福建生态环境. 柔性执法有温度营商环境显活力——福建生态环境厅公布减免处罚典型案例[EB/OL]. https://www.sohu.com/a/593357334_121106994, 2022-10-17.
[3]  岁正阳. 信用监管为推动高质量发展提供绿色动力[J]. 中国信用, 2022, 69(9): 38-39.
[4]  曾文远. 食品行政处罚中减轻处罚规范的适用[J]. 财经法学, 2019(2): 107-128.
[5]  罗秋. 从轻或减轻处罚须依法裁量[N]. 中国医药报, 2017-04-07(004).
[6]  钟震球. 浅谈药监行政处罚的从轻和减轻[N]. 中国医药报, 2009-06-27(006).
[7]  刘权利. 浅谈减轻行政处罚的法律适用[J]. 中国工商管理研究, 2012(12): 34-37.
[8]  宋京鸿. 浅议水行政执法中减轻行政处罚的法律适用[J]. 治淮, 2018(4): 70-72.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133