|
互联网平台保护青少年个人信息的主体责任完善
|
Abstract:
文章基于互联网平台披露的隐私政策及相关个人信息处理规则,探究在缺乏相关法律对已满14周岁未成年人即青少年的个人信息进行特别保护的情况下,国内互联网平台在处理个人信息的过程中是否尽到相应的主体责任。研究发现,互联网平台在处理青少年个人信息的多个环节存在问题,包括头部环节的同意规则适用对象与身份识别制度存在不足,中部环节的算法处理未尽告知义务与推送机制不完善等,以及尾部环节的匿名化处理替代删除不到位,建议互联网平台从同意规则、算法处理以及删除与匿名化处理规则三个层面完善主体责任。
Based on the privacy policies and personal information collection lists disclosed by internet plat-forms, this article explores whether domestic internet platforms have fulfilled their main responsibilities in handling personal information in the absence of relevant laws that provide special protection for the personal information of minors who have reached the age of 14, i.e. adolescents. The study found that Internet platforms have problems in several aspects of handling personal information of juveniles, including inadequate consent rules and identification systems in the first part of the process, insufficient notification obligations and inadequate push mechanisms in the middle part of the process, and inability to replace deletion with anonymisation in the last part of the process. It is recommended that internet platforms improve their main responsibilities at three levels: rules on consent, algorithmic processing and rules on deletion and anonymisation.
[1] | 王新鹏. 我国儿童隐私数据特殊保护立法研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2022. |
[2] | 孙跃元. 未成年人个人信息保护中监护人同意规则的检视与完善[J]. 华南师范大学学报, 2023(1): 149-164. |
[3] | 肖芄. 大型互联网平台侵害儿童个人信息权益的认定——兼评某短视频平台侵害未成年人个人信息民事公益诉讼案[J]. 法律适用, 2022(6): 76-82. |
[4] | 中华人民共和国最高人民检察院. 最高人民检察院第三十五批指导性案例[EB/OL].
https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbh/202203/t20220307_547722.shtml, 2022-03-07. |
[5] | 蔡蔚然. 去标识化个人信息分级处理的规则体系[J]. 山东社会科学, 2023(2): 185-192. |
[6] | 童艳. 个人信息匿名化处理再识别风险防范规则研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2022. |
[7] | 牛彬彬. 大数据时代群体维度的数据利益保护路径研究——以“用户标签”为中心[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 36(2): 86-98. |
[8] | Eichhorn, K. (2019) The End of Forgetting: Growing up with Social Media. Harvard University Press, Boston, 10.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239333 |
[9] | 王勇旗. 数字时代匿名化个人信息处理的正当性问题[J]. 图书馆, 2022(1): 8-15. |