全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

语料库语言学未来的发展路径研究——以“基于语料库”的研究范式为视角
Research on the Future Development Path of Corpus Linguistics—From the Perspective of “Corpus-Based” Research Paradigm

DOI: 10.12677/ML.2023.116355, PP. 2624-2629

Keywords: 语料库,语料库语言学,研究范式,发展路径
Corpus
, Corpus Linguistics, Research Paradigm, Development Path

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

语料库语言学为语言学领域继纯理论研究之后开启了一项全新的探索方式。人们不再只关注“内省”,凭感觉和意识归纳推理语言学理论,逐渐开始在数据收集、归纳与推理的实证研究上为语言学贡献自己的力量。为了探究语料库语言学未来的发展路径,本文就语料库语言学的起源与学科定位之争及其两种研究范式——“基于语料库”的研究方法和“语料库驱动”的研究方法和语料库语言学未来的发展进行研究。主要使用质化研究与量化研究相结合,以质化研究为主的方法,最终发现两种研究方法的哲学基础、学科属性、研究目的及操作方法等有很大的不同,而以语料库作为唯一数据来源的“语料库驱动”的研究方法很有可能会被语料库语言学所摒弃。
Corpus Linguistics opens up a new way in the field of linguistics after pure theoretical research. People no longer only focus on “introspection”, inductive linguistic theories based on feeling and consciousness, and gradually begin to contribute to linguistics in the empirical study of data col-lection, induction and deduction. In order to explore the future development path of corpus lin-guistics, this paper studies the origin and disciplinary positioning of corpus linguistics and its two research paradigms: the corpus-based approach and the corpus-driven approach, and the future development of corpus linguistics. Qualitative research is mainly used and combined qualitative research with quantitative research, it is finally found that the philosophical basis, disciplinary attributes, research objectives and operation methods of the two approaches are very different, and the corpus-driven approach with corpus as the only data source is likely to be abandoned by corpus linguistics.

References

[1]  梁茂成. 语料库语言学研究的两种范式: 渊源、分歧及前景[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2012, 44(3): 323-335+478.
[2]  Léon, J. (2005) Claimed and Unclaimed Sources of Corpus Linguistics. Henry Sweet Society Bulletin, 44, 34-48.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02674971.2005.11745607
[3]  Darnell, R. (2005) Linguistics in Britain: Personal Histories. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15, 276.
https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.2.276
[4]  Leech, G. and Johansson, S. (2009) The Coming of ICAME. ICAME Journal, 33, 5-20.
[5]  卫乃兴, 李文中, 濮建忠, 梁茂成, 何安平. 变化中的语料库语言学[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2014, 37(1): 1-9+159.
[6]  Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001) Corpus Linguistics at Work. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6
[7]  Storjohann, P. (2005) Corpus-Driven vs. Corpus-Based Approach to the Study of Relational patterns. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2005. Birmingham, 14-17 July 2005, 1-20.
[8]  Gries, S. (2010) Corpus Linguistics and Theoretical Linguistics: A Love-Hate Relationship? Not Necessarily. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 327-343.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.3.02gri
[9]  McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. CUP, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024
[10]  McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. (2001) Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
[11]  桂诗春, 冯志伟, 杨惠中, 何安平, 卫乃兴, 李文中, 梁茂成. 语料库语言学与中国外语教学[J]. 现代外语, 2010, 33(4): 419-426.
[12]  梁茂成. 微型文本及其在外语教学中的应用[J]. 外语电化教学, 2009(3): 8-12.
[13]  姜峰. 语料库与学术英语研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2019.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133