|
体育活动对青少年儿童性别社会化的Meta分析
|
Abstract:
目的:个体参加体育锻炼会对其性别角色发展产生不同的影响,探讨不同运动项群对男性化特征和女性化特征的影响效果及调节因素,为相关教学人员制定运动处方提供参考。方法:检索Web of Science、Pubmed、Springer、Elsevier、中国知网、万方、维普数据库于2000年1月1日~2023年2月22日发表的相关论文,由两名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料后,运用Comprehensive Meta analysis 3.3软件进行元分析,并选用Hedge’s g值作为效应量指标。结果:共纳入了6篇文章,22个独立效应量,817名被试。随机效应模型的meta分析表明:体育活动提高男性化特征较大(SMD = 0.870, p < 0.05),提高女性化特征较小(SMD = 0.338, p < 0.05)。对纳入文献进行异质性检验的结果表明,男性化特征异质性检验结果Q = 286.554 (p < 0.01),I2 = 95.812;女性化特征异质性检验结果Q = 112.405 (p < 0.01),I2 = 89.324,表明研究间存在较高的异质性,有必要进行亚组分析。亚组分析的结果表明,性别、年龄和测量工具对男性化特征和女性化特征均不存在显著调节作用,运动项群对男性化特征和女性化特征存在显著调节作用。结论:体育锻炼提高男性化特征较大,提高女性化特征较小。体育锻炼对性别社会化的影响不受性别、年龄、测量工具的调节。难美型项目可以明显提高女性化特征;对抗类、格斗类可以明显提高男性化特征。这些结果肯定了体育锻炼对于性别社会化的作用,促进了性别角色在体育领域的研究。
Objective: Individuals participating in physical exercise will have different effects on their gender role development. To explore the effects and moderating factors of different exercise groups on masculinity and femininity, and to provide reference for the formulation of exercise prescriptions for relevant teaching staff. Method: The relevant papers published on Web of Science, Pubmed, Springer, Elsevier, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases from January 1, 2000 to February 22, 2023 were retrieved. After literature screening and data extraction by two researchers, Comprehensive Meta analysis 3.3 software was used for meta-analysis, and Hedge’s g value was selected as the effect size index. Results: A total of 6 articles, 22 independent effect sizes, and 817 subjects were included. Meta-analysis of the random effects model showed that physical activity increased masculinity characteristics more (SMD = 0.870, p < 0.05), but decreased femininity characteristics (SMD = 0.338, p < 0.05). The heterogeneity test results of the included literatures showed that the heterogeneity test results of masculine characteristics Q = 286.554 (p < 0.01), I2 = 95.812; Q = 112.405 (p < 0.01), I2 = 89.324, indicating high inter-study heterogeneity, it is necessary to conduct subgroup analysis. The results of subgroup analysis showed that gender, age and measurement tools had no significant moderating effects on masculinity and femininity, but exercise group had significant moderating effects on masculinity and femininity. Conclusion: Physical exercise improves masculine characteristics more than feminine characteristics. The influence of physical exercise on gender socialization is not adjusted by gender, age and measuring tools. Unattractive items can significantly improve femininity; Antagonism and fighting can significantly improve masculinity.
[1] | 陈凌峰(2020). 体育活动改善青少年男性女性化的实验研究. 硕士学位论文, 湘潭: 湖南科技大学. |
[2] | 陈少青, 王芳, 王美芳(2021). 青少年性别角色与体质健康的关系: 体育行为的中介作用及性别差异. 体育学刊, 28(5), 94-99. |
[3] | 陈小明(2013). 足球运动训练对青少年双性化人格影响的研究. 硕士学位论文, 南昌: 江西科技师范大学. |
[4] | 董露露, 陈亮(2022). 身体活动对“性别角色”的作用: 文献证据及实践启示. 福建体育科技, 41(6), 11-16. |
[5] | 高潮(1990). 我国女子篮球足球运动员性别角色特征初探. 武汉体育学院学报, (4), 25-29. |
[6] | 郝卫兰(2022). 不同运动项目对职业技术学院学生性别角色认知的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 阜阳: 阜阳师范大学. |
[7] | 胡懿萍(2019). 跆拳道训练对7-12岁儿童攻击性、性别角色影响的实验研究. 硕士学位论文, 昆明: 云南师范大学. |
[8] | 胡茵(2010). 学校体育促进学生性别角色和性心理健康的研究. 黑龙江高教研究, (8), 131-133. |
[9] | 黄立红(2017). 体育活动提高男生基本特质与作用——特定体育活动对强化高中男生的男性化特质实验研究. 教育, (12), 13-14. |
[10] | 黄群玲(2010). 项群理论在高校体育教学中的指导与应用. 吉林体育学院学报, 26(2), 113-114. |
[11] | 刘永东(2001). 项群归类组合教学的研究与应用. 中国体育科技, (2), 18-20. |
[12] | 刘壮壮(2017). 影响高职院校男生参加健美操选项课的原因及对策研究. 运动, (2), 130-131. |
[13] | 漆昌柱, 邱泽瀚, 赵丹妹, 肖潇(2011). 体育锻炼对儿童性别角色社会化的影响. 武汉体育学院学报, 45(11), 63-66. |
[14] | 王赛花, 刘会平(2011). 高校健美操选项课弱势男生现象探讨——基于性别平等的视角. 体育科技, 32(3), 95-97. |
[15] | 吴鹏, 刘华山(2014). 道德推理与道德行为关系的元分析. 心理学报, 46(8), 1192-1207. |
[16] | 熊明生(2004). 柔道运动员与大学生男女双性化对比研究. 武汉体育学院学报, 38(3), 130-132. |
[17] | 张明阳(2016). 不同运动项群对青春期男性性别意识影响的实验研究. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 东北师范大学. |
[18] | 张晓波(2000). 健美操运动对大学生心理健康影响效应的调查分析. 广州体育学院学报, (4), 82-86. |
[19] | 张新华(2017). 儿童性别角色认同研究现状及教育策略. 开封教育学院学报, 37(9), 183-185. |
[20] | 张艳妮(2017). 运动员性别角色研究综述. 青少年体育, (10), 40-41. |
[21] | Bessey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676 |
[22] | Dettori, J. R., Norvell, D. C., & Chapman, J. R. (2022). Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider. Global Spine Journal, 12, 1624-1626. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527 |
[23] | John, C. S., Chris, M. B., Marianne, C., Ronald, C. P., & Kate, E. (2018). The Role of Self-Efficacy in Explaining Gender Differences in Physical Activity Among Adolescents: A Multilevel Analysis. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7, 176-183. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7.2.176 |
[24] | Kelley, G. A., & Kelley, K. S. (2019). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Rheumatology: A Gentle Introduction for Clinicians. Clinical Rheumatology, 38, 2029-2038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04590-6 |
[25] | Tina, A. (2021). Social and Personality Development (pp. 5-18). Taylor and Francis. |
[26] | Uttley, J. (2019). Power Analysis, Sample Size, and Assessment of Statistical Assumptions—Improving the Evidential Value of Lighting Research. LEUKOS, 15, 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2018.1533851 |
[27] | Wolfgang, V. (2007). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Psychometrika, 72, 269-271.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1450-y |